Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Transitional Care Interventions on Functional Status, Quality of Life and Readmission Rates in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Syn Yin Jessica Tan, Shihui Charlene Lee, Khairul Dzakirin Bin Rusli, Brigitte Fong Yeong Woo, Seng Giap Marcus Ang, Wentao Zhou, Wai San Wilson Tam, Sok Ying Liaw
{"title":"Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Transitional Care Interventions on Functional Status, Quality of Life and Readmission Rates in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Syn Yin Jessica Tan, Shihui Charlene Lee, Khairul Dzakirin Bin Rusli, Brigitte Fong Yeong Woo, Seng Giap Marcus Ang, Wentao Zhou, Wai San Wilson Tam, Sok Ying Liaw","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions on functional status, quality of life and readmission rates of stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies with interventions to ease the hospital-to-home transition of stroke patients that were delivered by multidisciplinary teams consisting of registered healthcare professionals from at least two disciplines were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for quality appraisal.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for randomised controlled trials delivering transitional care interventions to hospitalised stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one randomised controlled trials were included in the final review. The studies featured multidisciplinary teams of two to nine professionals, most commonly nurses, physicians and physiotherapists. Although multidisciplinary care improved functional status and quality of life scores, the impact on readmission rates was inconclusive. Meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in functional status when care involved physicians, care coordinators (often nurses) or had teams of more than two healthcare professionals. Significant improvement in quality of life was also reported when care involved physicians or in teams with more than two healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions show promise in improving functional status and quality of life after stroke. Their effectiveness depends on team composition and coordination, particularly the inclusion of physicians and care coordinators. Future research should address reporting gaps and evaluate broader strategies to reduce hospital readmissions.</p><p><strong>Implications for profession and patient care: </strong>Impact (Addressing) What problem did the study address? ○ The effectiveness of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions for stroke patients. ○ Evaluated the role of various healthcare professionals within these teams. What were the main findings? ○ Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions significantly enhance stroke patients' functional status, especially within the first 3 months. ○ Teams with care coordinators (often nurses) and supportive physicians improve functional outcomes, with effective communication being crucial despite underreporting of specific practices. ○ Teams comprising of more than two health professionals can significantly improve stroke patients' functional status. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○ Healthcare institutions and providers: The findings can guide healthcare institutions in developing and implementing effective transitional care services for stroke patients. ○ Stroke patients: Patients receiving multidisciplinary transitional care are likely to experience enhanced functional recovery and improved ability to perform daily activities. ○ Policymakers and researchers: The study highlights the need for more detailed reporting and research on communication practices within multidisciplinary teams and the importance of evaluating underreported outcomes like readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions on functional status, quality of life and readmission rates of stroke patients.
Design: Quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: Studies with interventions to ease the hospital-to-home transition of stroke patients that were delivered by multidisciplinary teams consisting of registered healthcare professionals from at least two disciplines were included. Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for quality appraisal.
Data sources: Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for randomised controlled trials delivering transitional care interventions to hospitalised stroke patients.
Results: Thirty-one randomised controlled trials were included in the final review. The studies featured multidisciplinary teams of two to nine professionals, most commonly nurses, physicians and physiotherapists. Although multidisciplinary care improved functional status and quality of life scores, the impact on readmission rates was inconclusive. Meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in functional status when care involved physicians, care coordinators (often nurses) or had teams of more than two healthcare professionals. Significant improvement in quality of life was also reported when care involved physicians or in teams with more than two healthcare professionals.
Conclusions: Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions show promise in improving functional status and quality of life after stroke. Their effectiveness depends on team composition and coordination, particularly the inclusion of physicians and care coordinators. Future research should address reporting gaps and evaluate broader strategies to reduce hospital readmissions.
Implications for profession and patient care: Impact (Addressing) What problem did the study address? ○ The effectiveness of multidisciplinary transitional care interventions for stroke patients. ○ Evaluated the role of various healthcare professionals within these teams. What were the main findings? ○ Multidisciplinary transitional care interventions significantly enhance stroke patients' functional status, especially within the first 3 months. ○ Teams with care coordinators (often nurses) and supportive physicians improve functional outcomes, with effective communication being crucial despite underreporting of specific practices. ○ Teams comprising of more than two health professionals can significantly improve stroke patients' functional status. Where and on whom will the research have an impact? ○ Healthcare institutions and providers: The findings can guide healthcare institutions in developing and implementing effective transitional care services for stroke patients. ○ Stroke patients: Patients receiving multidisciplinary transitional care are likely to experience enhanced functional recovery and improved ability to perform daily activities. ○ Policymakers and researchers: The study highlights the need for more detailed reporting and research on communication practices within multidisciplinary teams and the importance of evaluating underreported outcomes like readmission rates.
Reporting method: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.
Patient or public contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.
目的:评价多学科过渡性护理干预对脑卒中患者功能状态、生活质量及再入院率的影响。设计:定量系统评价和荟萃分析。方法:纳入由至少两个学科的注册医疗保健专业人员组成的多学科团队提供的缓解脑卒中患者从医院到家庭过渡的干预研究。采用Cochrane偏倚风险工具进行质量评价。数据来源:检索7个电子数据库(PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science),寻找为住院中风患者提供过渡性护理干预的随机对照试验。结果:31项随机对照试验被纳入最终综述。这些研究的特点是由两到九名专业人员组成的多学科团队,最常见的是护士、医生和物理治疗师。虽然多学科治疗改善了功能状态和生活质量评分,但对再入院率的影响尚无定论。荟萃分析显示,当护理涉及医生、护理协调员(通常是护士)或有两个以上医疗保健专业人员的团队时,功能状态有显著改善。当护理由医生或由两名以上保健专业人员组成的小组进行时,还报告了生活质量的显著改善。结论:多学科过渡护理干预有望改善脑卒中后的功能状态和生活质量。其有效性取决于团队的组成和协调,特别是医生和护理协调员的参与。未来的研究应解决报告差距和评估更广泛的策略,以减少医院再入院。对专业和病人护理的启示:影响(解决)研究解决了什么问题?〇多学科过渡护理干预脑卒中患者的有效性。〇评估各医疗专业人员在这些团队中的作用。主要发现是什么?〇多学科过渡护理干预可显著改善脑卒中患者的功能状态,尤其是在前3个月内。〇拥有护理协调员(通常是护士)和支持性医生的团队可以改善功能结果,尽管具体实践报告不足,但有效的沟通至关重要。〇由2名以上的专业人员组成的团队可以显著改善中风患者的功能状况。这项研究将对谁和在哪里产生影响?〇医疗机构和提供者:研究结果可以指导医疗机构制定和实施有效的卒中患者过渡护理服务。〇中风患者:接受多学科过渡护理的患者可能会经历增强的功能恢复和日常活动能力的改善。〇政策制定者和研究人员:该研究强调需要对多学科团队的沟通实践进行更详细的报告和研究,以及评估再入院率等被低估的结果的重要性。报告方法:首选报告项目为系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)清单。患者或公众捐赠:无患者或公众捐赠。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.