Lauren Q Malthaner, Jill D McLeigh, Gregory Knell, Katelyn K Jetelina, Folefac Atem, Sarah E Messiah
{"title":"Prenatal Substance Exposure and Positive Developmental Delay Screening Among Patients in Foster Care.","authors":"Lauren Q Malthaner, Jill D McLeigh, Gregory Knell, Katelyn K Jetelina, Folefac Atem, Sarah E Messiah","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Prenatal substance exposure (PSE) is a known risk factor for negative birth outcomes and long-term health outcomes like neurodevelopmental problems. Children in foster care have increased exposure to PSE and higher proportions of developmental delay compared with the general population. It is unclear whether differences still exist among developmental delay screening among children in foster care with and without PSE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from patient medical records of a primary care clinic for children in foster care between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Cox proportional hazards regression generated hazard of positive developmental delay screening using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 among those who with and without PSE controlling for sex, race, ethnicity, prematurity, caregiver type, as well as interaction between PSE and prematurity and PSE and race.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 975 patients. 60.4% had PSE, and 62.6% had a positive developmental delay screening at least once. 52.9% were male, and 45.5% were White. Those who had PSE but were nonpremature had 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.29) times the hazard of positive developmental delay screening compared with those without PSE and prematurity. However, those with PSE and prematurity had 2.01 times the hazard of positive developmental delay screening than those without either condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children in foster care with PSE are at risk for positive developmental delay screening compared with those without; however, those with both PSE and prematurity are at extra risk. This interaction should be considered when making inferences regarding developmental delay screening in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001383","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Prenatal substance exposure (PSE) is a known risk factor for negative birth outcomes and long-term health outcomes like neurodevelopmental problems. Children in foster care have increased exposure to PSE and higher proportions of developmental delay compared with the general population. It is unclear whether differences still exist among developmental delay screening among children in foster care with and without PSE.
Methods: Data were extracted from patient medical records of a primary care clinic for children in foster care between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Cox proportional hazards regression generated hazard of positive developmental delay screening using the Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 among those who with and without PSE controlling for sex, race, ethnicity, prematurity, caregiver type, as well as interaction between PSE and prematurity and PSE and race.
Results: The sample included 975 patients. 60.4% had PSE, and 62.6% had a positive developmental delay screening at least once. 52.9% were male, and 45.5% were White. Those who had PSE but were nonpremature had 1.14 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.29) times the hazard of positive developmental delay screening compared with those without PSE and prematurity. However, those with PSE and prematurity had 2.01 times the hazard of positive developmental delay screening than those without either condition.
Conclusion: Children in foster care with PSE are at risk for positive developmental delay screening compared with those without; however, those with both PSE and prematurity are at extra risk. This interaction should be considered when making inferences regarding developmental delay screening in this population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.