Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Patellar and Achilles Tendon Loading: A Scoping Review With Practical Recommendations.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
João Luiz Quaglioti Durigan, Naoaki Ito, Sarah E Katz, Lindsay Kalish, Stephanie G Cone, Karin Grävare Silbernagel
{"title":"Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Patellar and Achilles Tendon Loading: A Scoping Review With Practical Recommendations.","authors":"João Luiz Quaglioti Durigan, Naoaki Ito, Sarah E Katz, Lindsay Kalish, Stephanie G Cone, Karin Grävare Silbernagel","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVE:</b> To summarize the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) interventions for improving strength outcomes after injuries such as tendon ruptures and tendinopathies. <b>DESIGN</b>: Scoping review. <b>LITERATURE SEARCH:</b> A bibliographic database search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Cochrane Library databases between June and July 2024. <b>STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA:</b> Data on participant demographics, study characteristics, NMES parameters, tendon-related outcomes, and study quality (PEDro scale) were extracted. <b>DATA SYNTHESIS:</b> We performed a scoping review on NMES parameters and dosages used for treating tendon injuries. <b>RESULTS:</b> Of 973 records, 10 studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 3 crossovers, 2 cohorts) involving 166 participants (82.2% male) were included. Most participants were healthy (60%), whereas others had patellar tendinopathy (20%), spinal cord injury (10%), or Achilles tendon rupture (10%). NMES parameters were well detailed; however, only 3 studies reported the dosage. Within-session, NMES alone or superimposed (NMES<sup>+</sup>) altered tendon loading by increasing force, strain, and stress. NMES also changed tendon mechanical properties in both the short and long term. In long-term studies, implementing NMES<sup>+</sup> reduced tendinopathy symptoms and pain during tendon loading activities. One study compared NMES<sup>+</sup> to heavy slow resistance training, whereas another compared NMES<sup>+</sup> to baseline. PEDro scores ranged from 1 to 7. <b>CONCLUSIONS:</b> Studies on NMES for tendon loading were generally well documented. There is room for improvement in detailed reporting of specific dosage and evoked torque to facilitate the clinical implementation of NMES for tendon rehabilitation. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(7):482-494. Epub 16 June 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13151</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 7","pages":"482-494"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) interventions for improving strength outcomes after injuries such as tendon ruptures and tendinopathies. DESIGN: Scoping review. LITERATURE SEARCH: A bibliographic database search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Cochrane Library databases between June and July 2024. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Data on participant demographics, study characteristics, NMES parameters, tendon-related outcomes, and study quality (PEDro scale) were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: We performed a scoping review on NMES parameters and dosages used for treating tendon injuries. RESULTS: Of 973 records, 10 studies (5 randomized controlled trials, 3 crossovers, 2 cohorts) involving 166 participants (82.2% male) were included. Most participants were healthy (60%), whereas others had patellar tendinopathy (20%), spinal cord injury (10%), or Achilles tendon rupture (10%). NMES parameters were well detailed; however, only 3 studies reported the dosage. Within-session, NMES alone or superimposed (NMES+) altered tendon loading by increasing force, strain, and stress. NMES also changed tendon mechanical properties in both the short and long term. In long-term studies, implementing NMES+ reduced tendinopathy symptoms and pain during tendon loading activities. One study compared NMES+ to heavy slow resistance training, whereas another compared NMES+ to baseline. PEDro scores ranged from 1 to 7. CONCLUSIONS: Studies on NMES for tendon loading were generally well documented. There is room for improvement in detailed reporting of specific dosage and evoked torque to facilitate the clinical implementation of NMES for tendon rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(7):482-494. Epub 16 June 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13151.

髌骨和跟腱负荷的神经肌肉电刺激:具有实用建议的范围综述。
目的:总结神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)干预对改善肌腱断裂和肌腱病变等损伤后力量结局的影响。设计:范围审查。文献检索:检索PubMed、Web of Science、护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)和Cochrane图书馆数据库,检索时间为2024年6月至7月。研究选择标准:提取参与者人口统计学、研究特征、NMES参数、肌腱相关结局和研究质量(PEDro量表)的数据。数据综合:我们对用于治疗肌腱损伤的NMES参数和剂量进行了范围审查。结果:973份文献中,纳入10项研究(5项随机对照试验、3项交叉试验、2项队列),共166名受试者,其中男性占82.2%。大多数参与者是健康的(60%),而其他人有髌骨肌腱病变(20%),脊髓损伤(10%)或跟腱断裂(10%)。NMES参数非常详细;然而,只有3项研究报告了该剂量。在疗程内,NMES单独或叠加(NMES+)通过增加力、应变和应力来改变肌腱负荷。NMES在短期和长期内也改变了肌腱的力学性能。在长期研究中,实施NMES+可减轻肌腱负荷活动时的肌腱病变症状和疼痛。一项研究将NMES+与高强度慢阻训练进行比较,而另一项研究将NMES+与基线进行比较。PEDro得分范围从1到7。结论:NMES对肌腱负荷的研究通常有很好的文献记载。在具体剂量和诱发扭矩的详细报告方面还有改进的空间,以方便临床实施NMES用于肌腱康复。[J] .中华体育杂志,2015;31(7):482-494。Epub 2025年6月16日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.13151。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信