Understanding engagement with digital health interventions designed for adults with hearing loss and tinnitus: a mixed-method systematic review.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Akshaya Ravichandran, Melanie A Ferguson, Wilhelmina H A M Mulders, Robyn S M Choi, Rebecca J Bennett
{"title":"Understanding engagement with digital health interventions designed for adults with hearing loss and tinnitus: a mixed-method systematic review.","authors":"Akshaya Ravichandran, Melanie A Ferguson, Wilhelmina H A M Mulders, Robyn S M Choi, Rebecca J Bennett","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hearing loss and tinnitus are pervasive disabilities globally, which significantly impact individuals' quality of life. Integrating Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) with traditional audiological management has proven beneficial for hearing loss and tinnitus management. Although it is established that DHI engagement is important for the real-world effectiveness of DHIs, there is a lack of systematic evidence aiming to understand engagement with DHIs in audiology.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review identified factors associated with hearing healthcare DHI engagement to inform future DHI development and research in audiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adhering to Synthesis without Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a mixed-methods systematic review using a convergent integrated approach. A comprehensive search across seven databases until December 16, 2023, identified 62 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data extraction involved modifying the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) extraction form and deductive coding using the Perski et al. (2017) framework to identify factors related to engagement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review revealed a diverse range of factors associated with DHI engagement in the audiology literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analysis within the Perski et al. (2017) framework highlighted the importance of user-related constructs, such as enhancing DHI accessibility, empowering users, and aligning DHIs with user needs and lifestyles in facilitating engagement. Due to the limited number of studies focusing on engagement as the primary outcome, we based our inferences on secondary outcomes and discussions from the available literature. While this review consolidates existing knowledge on engagement, it underscored the imperative for more in-depth investigations into engagement with hearing healthcare DHIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12207976/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hearing loss and tinnitus are pervasive disabilities globally, which significantly impact individuals' quality of life. Integrating Digital Health Interventions (DHIs) with traditional audiological management has proven beneficial for hearing loss and tinnitus management. Although it is established that DHI engagement is important for the real-world effectiveness of DHIs, there is a lack of systematic evidence aiming to understand engagement with DHIs in audiology.

Purpose: This systematic review identified factors associated with hearing healthcare DHI engagement to inform future DHI development and research in audiology.

Methods: Adhering to Synthesis without Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a mixed-methods systematic review using a convergent integrated approach. A comprehensive search across seven databases until December 16, 2023, identified 62 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Data extraction involved modifying the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) extraction form and deductive coding using the Perski et al. (2017) framework to identify factors related to engagement.

Results: The review revealed a diverse range of factors associated with DHI engagement in the audiology literature.

Conclusion: Analysis within the Perski et al. (2017) framework highlighted the importance of user-related constructs, such as enhancing DHI accessibility, empowering users, and aligning DHIs with user needs and lifestyles in facilitating engagement. Due to the limited number of studies focusing on engagement as the primary outcome, we based our inferences on secondary outcomes and discussions from the available literature. While this review consolidates existing knowledge on engagement, it underscored the imperative for more in-depth investigations into engagement with hearing healthcare DHIs.

了解为听力损失和耳鸣的成年人设计的数字健康干预措施的参与:一项混合方法的系统回顾。
背景:听力损失和耳鸣是全球普遍存在的残疾,严重影响个体的生活质量。将数字健康干预(DHIs)与传统听力学管理相结合已被证明对听力损失和耳鸣管理有益。虽然已经确定DHI参与对DHIs的实际有效性很重要,但缺乏旨在了解听力学中DHIs参与的系统证据。目的:本系统综述确定了与听力保健DHI参与相关的因素,为未来DHI的发展和听力学研究提供信息。方法:我们遵循无荟萃分析的综合指南,采用聚合综合方法进行了一项混合方法的系统评价。截至2023年12月16日,在7个数据库中进行了全面搜索,确定了62项符合纳入标准的研究。数据提取涉及修改乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的提取形式和使用Perski等人(2017)框架的演绎编码,以确定与敬业度相关的因素。结果:该综述揭示了听力学文献中与DHI参与相关的多种因素。结论:Perski等人(2017)框架内的分析强调了与用户相关的结构的重要性,例如增强DHI的可访问性,赋予用户权力,并使DHI与用户需求和生活方式保持一致,以促进参与。由于将参与作为主要结果的研究数量有限,我们的推论基于次要结果和现有文献的讨论。虽然这篇综述巩固了现有的关于参与的知识,但它强调了对听力保健DHIs参与进行更深入调查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信