Application of the International Classification of Health Interventions for coding interventions in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.

IF 3.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf063
Faheema Mahomed-Asmail, Ilze Oosthuizen, Catherine Sykes, Soraya Maart, Richard Madden, De Wet Swanepoel, Vinaya Manchaiah
{"title":"Application of the International Classification of Health Interventions for coding interventions in adults with sensorineural hearing loss.","authors":"Faheema Mahomed-Asmail, Ilze Oosthuizen, Catherine Sykes, Soraya Maart, Richard Madden, De Wet Swanepoel, Vinaya Manchaiah","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI), currently being developed, seeks to span all sectors of the health system. Our objective was to determine the coverage of the ICHI for hearing interventions commonly delivered to adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A 3-phase content mapping method was used, which included (1) identification of source terms with an expert panel in audiology rehabilitation; (2) 3 coders independently applied the classification to the source terms; and (3) the coders reached a consensus for each intervention and identified reasons for initial discrepancies with options not linked to a specific code were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen different ICHI Target categories were identified, with 23 different ICHI Action categories and 82% of the means being \"Other and unspecified.\" There was consensus in codes for 54.3% of source terms, with no ICHI code found for 8.5% of source terms. The greatest number of discrepancies arose from the action, followed by the target. Coding discrepancies occurred as a result of misunderstanding of source terms, the clinical use thereof, and difficulty determining the type of Target.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite its broad scope, ICHI's current framework has gaps in its coverage of audiological interventions, particularly those related to sensorineural hearing loss. Addressing these gaps is crucial for improving global data standardization and facilitating the development of more targeted hearing health policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study makes an important contribution to the further development and refinement of the classification, specifically in the context of hearing healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"8 3","pages":"ooaf063"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The International Classification of Health Interventions (ICHI), currently being developed, seeks to span all sectors of the health system. Our objective was to determine the coverage of the ICHI for hearing interventions commonly delivered to adults with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

Material and methods: A 3-phase content mapping method was used, which included (1) identification of source terms with an expert panel in audiology rehabilitation; (2) 3 coders independently applied the classification to the source terms; and (3) the coders reached a consensus for each intervention and identified reasons for initial discrepancies with options not linked to a specific code were identified.

Results: Nineteen different ICHI Target categories were identified, with 23 different ICHI Action categories and 82% of the means being "Other and unspecified." There was consensus in codes for 54.3% of source terms, with no ICHI code found for 8.5% of source terms. The greatest number of discrepancies arose from the action, followed by the target. Coding discrepancies occurred as a result of misunderstanding of source terms, the clinical use thereof, and difficulty determining the type of Target.

Discussion: Despite its broad scope, ICHI's current framework has gaps in its coverage of audiological interventions, particularly those related to sensorineural hearing loss. Addressing these gaps is crucial for improving global data standardization and facilitating the development of more targeted hearing health policies.

Conclusion: This study makes an important contribution to the further development and refinement of the classification, specifically in the context of hearing healthcare.

国际健康干预分类在成人感音神经性听力损失患者编码干预中的应用。
目标:目前正在制定的《国际卫生干预措施分类》力求涵盖卫生系统的所有部门。我们的目的是确定ICHI对成人感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)听力干预的覆盖范围。材料和方法:采用三阶段内容映射法,包括(1)与听力学康复专家小组识别源项;(2) 3个编码器独立对源项进行分类;(3)编码人员对每个干预措施达成共识,并确定了与特定代码不相关的选项初始差异的原因。结果:确定了19种不同的ICHI目标类别,23种不同的ICHI动作类别,82%的手段是“其他和未指定的”。54.3%的源项的代码是一致的,8.5%的源项没有找到ICHI代码。最多的差异来自行动,其次是目标。编码差异的发生是由于对源术语的误解、临床使用以及难以确定目标类型造成的。讨论:尽管其范围广泛,但ICHI目前的框架在听力学干预方面存在差距,特别是与感音神经性听力损失相关的听力学干预。解决这些差距对于改善全球数据标准化和促进制定更有针对性的听力卫生政策至关重要。结论:本研究为进一步发展和完善该分类,特别是在听力保健方面做出了重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信