Examining our lens: how bias heightens disparities in trauma research.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2025-06-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001452
Sydney Timmer-Murillo, Kathryn M Stadeli, Jacob Higgins, Bethany L Strong, Shayan Rakhit, Brianna R Fram, Garrett D Hall, Anamaria J Robles, Tandis Soltani, Rachael A Callcut, Vanessa P Ho, Cynthia Lizette Villarreal, Michelle A Price, Susan E Cronn
{"title":"Examining our lens: how bias heightens disparities in trauma research.","authors":"Sydney Timmer-Murillo, Kathryn M Stadeli, Jacob Higgins, Bethany L Strong, Shayan Rakhit, Brianna R Fram, Garrett D Hall, Anamaria J Robles, Tandis Soltani, Rachael A Callcut, Vanessa P Ho, Cynthia Lizette Villarreal, Michelle A Price, Susan E Cronn","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Trauma research is an expansive discipline that informs injury prevention, best practices in care, and novel interventions. However, implicit bias, or the unconscious stereotypical beliefs about groups of people, can have profound implications for traumatic injury research. Several forms of implicit bias can emerge in trauma research, which deepens existing disparities based on race or ethnicity, sex, ability status, socioeconomic status, and other factors. This paper reviews how implicit bias affects the development of research and the application of findings, potentially leading to suboptimal care and misdirected preventive strategies in trauma. We present the recent dialogue and progress on implicit bias in research at the Summit on the Advancement of Focused Equity Research in Trauma (SAFER-Trauma) conference, an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-funded assembly of multiple disciplines which was convened to tackle the challenges involved in addressing disparities in traumatic injury. Through this review, we seek to generate momentum for action toward reducing implicit bias and establishing comprehensive equity-focused standards of trauma research and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"10 Suppl 4","pages":"e001452"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12198817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Trauma research is an expansive discipline that informs injury prevention, best practices in care, and novel interventions. However, implicit bias, or the unconscious stereotypical beliefs about groups of people, can have profound implications for traumatic injury research. Several forms of implicit bias can emerge in trauma research, which deepens existing disparities based on race or ethnicity, sex, ability status, socioeconomic status, and other factors. This paper reviews how implicit bias affects the development of research and the application of findings, potentially leading to suboptimal care and misdirected preventive strategies in trauma. We present the recent dialogue and progress on implicit bias in research at the Summit on the Advancement of Focused Equity Research in Trauma (SAFER-Trauma) conference, an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality-funded assembly of multiple disciplines which was convened to tackle the challenges involved in addressing disparities in traumatic injury. Through this review, we seek to generate momentum for action toward reducing implicit bias and establishing comprehensive equity-focused standards of trauma research and practice.

审视我们的镜头:偏见如何加剧创伤研究中的差异。
创伤研究是一个广泛的学科,告知伤害预防,护理的最佳做法,和新的干预措施。然而,内隐偏见,或对人群无意识的刻板印象,可以对创伤性损伤研究产生深远的影响。在创伤研究中可能会出现几种形式的内隐偏见,这加深了基于种族或民族、性别、能力地位、社会经济地位和其他因素的现有差异。本文回顾了内隐偏见如何影响研究的发展和研究结果的应用,潜在地导致创伤的次优护理和错误的预防策略。我们在创伤重点公平研究进步峰会(SAFER-Trauma)会议上介绍了最近关于研究中隐性偏见的对话和进展,该会议是由医疗保健研究和质量资助的多学科会议机构召开的,旨在解决创伤性损伤差异所涉及的挑战。通过这篇综述,我们寻求为减少隐性偏见和建立创伤研究和实践的全面公平标准的行动产生动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信