Outcomes of High Kidney Donor Profile Index Hepatitis C Nucleic Acid Testing Positive Kidneys are Equivalent to Matched Hepatitis C Nucleic Acid Testing Negative Kidneys.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001827
Shengliang He, Christie P Thomas, Alan E Gunderson, Patrick Ten Eyck, Alan I Reed
{"title":"Outcomes of High Kidney Donor Profile Index Hepatitis C Nucleic Acid Testing Positive Kidneys are Equivalent to Matched Hepatitis C Nucleic Acid Testing Negative Kidneys.","authors":"Shengliang He, Christie P Thomas, Alan E Gunderson, Patrick Ten Eyck, Alan I Reed","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A recent Organ Procurement and Transplant Network policy change removes hepatitis C virus (HCV) status and race from the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) calculation, thereby lowering the KDPI of HCV nucleic acid testing positive (NAT<sup>+</sup>) kidneys and increasing their allocation priority. However, even in the era of direct-acting antivirals, high KDPI HCV NAT<sup>+</sup> kidneys exhibited higher discard rates compared with their HCV NAT<sup>-</sup> counterparts, and outcome data for this \"high-risk\" group remain limited. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by providing comprehensive outcome data to better inform organ allocation and selection decisions under the new KDPI framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using national transplant data from 2015 to 2023, we analyzed adult deceased donor kidney transplants stratified by KDPI and HCV NAT status. An exact matching model was used to identify the matched HCV NAT<sup>-</sup> group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in delayed graft function, rejection, or patient and graft survival between high KDPI HCV NAT<sup>+</sup> and matched HCV NAT<sup>-</sup> recipients. High KDPI HCV NAT<sup>+</sup> kidneys were more often allocated regionally or nationally, with 67.6% occurring in 4 regions. Their recipients were more likely to have a high school education and shorter wait times. After the policy change, >90% of prior high KDPI HCV NAT<sup>+</sup> kidneys will no longer be classified as high KDPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the safe utilization of previously high KDPI HCV NAT<sup>+</sup> kidneys after a policy change. Although the revised KDPI may assist clinicians in identifying higher-quality organs, its impact on existing sociodemographic disparities and overall organ utilization rate remains uncertain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 7","pages":"e1827"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A recent Organ Procurement and Transplant Network policy change removes hepatitis C virus (HCV) status and race from the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) calculation, thereby lowering the KDPI of HCV nucleic acid testing positive (NAT+) kidneys and increasing their allocation priority. However, even in the era of direct-acting antivirals, high KDPI HCV NAT+ kidneys exhibited higher discard rates compared with their HCV NAT- counterparts, and outcome data for this "high-risk" group remain limited. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by providing comprehensive outcome data to better inform organ allocation and selection decisions under the new KDPI framework.

Methods: Using national transplant data from 2015 to 2023, we analyzed adult deceased donor kidney transplants stratified by KDPI and HCV NAT status. An exact matching model was used to identify the matched HCV NAT- group.

Results: No significant differences were observed in delayed graft function, rejection, or patient and graft survival between high KDPI HCV NAT+ and matched HCV NAT- recipients. High KDPI HCV NAT+ kidneys were more often allocated regionally or nationally, with 67.6% occurring in 4 regions. Their recipients were more likely to have a high school education and shorter wait times. After the policy change, >90% of prior high KDPI HCV NAT+ kidneys will no longer be classified as high KDPI.

Conclusions: Our findings support the safe utilization of previously high KDPI HCV NAT+ kidneys after a policy change. Although the revised KDPI may assist clinicians in identifying higher-quality organs, its impact on existing sociodemographic disparities and overall organ utilization rate remains uncertain.

高供者资料指数的丙型肝炎核酸检测阳性肾脏与匹配的丙型肝炎核酸检测阴性肾脏的结果相当。
背景:最近的器官获取和移植网络政策改变将丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)状态和种族从肾脏供者概况指数(KDPI)计算中删除,从而降低了HCV核酸检测阳性(NAT+)肾脏的KDPI,并增加了其分配优先权。然而,即使在直接作用抗病毒药物的时代,高KDPI HCV NAT+肾脏与HCV NAT-肾脏相比,显示出更高的丢弃率,并且这一“高风险”群体的结果数据仍然有限。本研究旨在通过提供全面的结果数据来解决这一知识差距,以便在新的KDPI框架下更好地为器官分配和选择决策提供信息。方法:利用2015年至2023年的全国移植数据,分析按KDPI和HCV NAT状态分层的成人已故供肾移植。采用精确匹配模型识别匹配的HCV NAT-组。结果:在高KDPI HCV NAT+和匹配的HCV NAT-受体之间,在延迟移植功能、排斥反应或患者和移植存活方面没有观察到显著差异。高KDPI HCV NAT+肾脏更多地分布在地区或全国,67.6%发生在4个地区。他们的接受者更有可能接受过高中教育,等待时间也更短。政策改变后,先前KDPI高的HCV NAT+肾脏将不再被归类为高KDPI。结论:我们的研究结果支持在政策改变后使用先前高KDPI HCV NAT+肾脏的安全性。虽然修订后的KDPI可以帮助临床医生识别更高质量的器官,但其对现有社会人口差异和整体器官利用率的影响仍不确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信