Impact of the Composite Allocation Score on Lung Transplant Waitlist and Posttransplant Outcomes.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001836
Ye In Christopher Kwon, Holly Caboti-Jones, Michael Keller, Andrew Min-Gi Park, Alan Lai, Rachit D Shah, Zachary Fitch, Vigneshwar Kasirajan, Vipul Patel, Zubair A Hashmi
{"title":"Impact of the Composite Allocation Score on Lung Transplant Waitlist and Posttransplant Outcomes.","authors":"Ye In Christopher Kwon, Holly Caboti-Jones, Michael Keller, Andrew Min-Gi Park, Alan Lai, Rachit D Shah, Zachary Fitch, Vigneshwar Kasirajan, Vipul Patel, Zubair A Hashmi","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>On March 9, 2023, the Composite Allocation Score (CAS) was introduced for all lung transplantation (LT) candidates. We analyzed waitlist and posttransplant outcomes after CAS implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (2022-2024), adult patients listed for isolated LT were divided into 2 eras: era 1 (pre-CAS: March 1, 2022-March 8, 2023) and era 2 (post-CAS: March 9, 2023-September 30, 2024). Competing risk regression analyzed waitlist events. Recipient/donor characteristics and mortality risk factors were assessed with Cox models. Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 6398 LTs, 2598 (40.6%) occurred in era 2. More Black patients (16.9% versus 15%, <i>P</i> = 0.04) and those with a high school education (35.4% versus 33.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.0003) were transplanted. ABO type O patients were less likely to undergo LT (42.5% versus 46.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.04). Era 2 had longer transport distances (231 versus 202 miles, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), ischemic times (5.1 versus 4.9 h, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and increased use of flights (79.1% versus 72.8%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Donation after circulatory death (9.4% versus 6.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and normothermic regional perfusion (2.2% versus 1.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.02) usage rose. Waitlist times decreased (29 versus 31 d, <i>P</i> = 0.009), with improved outcomes (sub-hazard ratio, 0.70; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Era 2 showed superior 6-mo and 1-y survival (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and reduced rejection treatment (2.6% versus 14.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of CAS was associated with reduced waitlist mortality, improved access for marginalized groups, and enhanced survival. Lungs were procured from greater distances with an increased use of donation after circulatory death with normothermic regional perfusion or ex vivo perfusion. Disparities remain for ABO type O patients, warranting closer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 7","pages":"e1836"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: On March 9, 2023, the Composite Allocation Score (CAS) was introduced for all lung transplantation (LT) candidates. We analyzed waitlist and posttransplant outcomes after CAS implementation.

Methods: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry (2022-2024), adult patients listed for isolated LT were divided into 2 eras: era 1 (pre-CAS: March 1, 2022-March 8, 2023) and era 2 (post-CAS: March 9, 2023-September 30, 2024). Competing risk regression analyzed waitlist events. Recipient/donor characteristics and mortality risk factors were assessed with Cox models. Survival was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results: Among 6398 LTs, 2598 (40.6%) occurred in era 2. More Black patients (16.9% versus 15%, P = 0.04) and those with a high school education (35.4% versus 33.4%, P = 0.0003) were transplanted. ABO type O patients were less likely to undergo LT (42.5% versus 46.6%, P = 0.04). Era 2 had longer transport distances (231 versus 202 miles, P < 0.0001), ischemic times (5.1 versus 4.9 h, P < 0.0001), and increased use of flights (79.1% versus 72.8%, P < 0.0001). Donation after circulatory death (9.4% versus 6.2%, P < 0.0001) and normothermic regional perfusion (2.2% versus 1.2%, P = 0.02) usage rose. Waitlist times decreased (29 versus 31 d, P = 0.009), with improved outcomes (sub-hazard ratio, 0.70; P < 0.0001). Era 2 showed superior 6-mo and 1-y survival (P < 0.0001) and reduced rejection treatment (2.6% versus 14.5%, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The implementation of CAS was associated with reduced waitlist mortality, improved access for marginalized groups, and enhanced survival. Lungs were procured from greater distances with an increased use of donation after circulatory death with normothermic regional perfusion or ex vivo perfusion. Disparities remain for ABO type O patients, warranting closer follow-up.

复合分配评分对肺移植等待名单和移植后结果的影响。
背景:2023年3月9日,综合分配评分(CAS)被引入所有肺移植(LT)候选人。我们分析了CAS实施后的等待名单和移植后的结果。方法:使用美国器官共享登记网络(2022-2024),将成人孤立性肝移植患者分为2个时代:第1时代(cas前:2022年3月1日至2023年3月8日)和第2时代(cas后:2023年3月9日至2024年9月30日)。竞争风险回归分析候补名单事件。采用Cox模型评估受体/供体特征和死亡危险因素。用Kaplan-Meier分析评估生存率。结果:6398例LTs中,2598例(40.6%)发生在2期。黑人患者(16.9%比15%,P = 0.04)和高中学历患者(35.4%比33.4%,P = 0.0003)接受移植较多。ABO O型患者接受LT的可能性较低(42.5%比46.6%,P = 0.04)。Era 2的运输距离更长(231英里对202英里,P P P P P = 0.02),使用率上升。等候名单时间减少(29天和31天,P = 0.009),结果改善(亚风险比,0.70;结论:CAS的实施与降低等候名单死亡率,改善边缘化群体的可及性和提高生存率有关。在循环死亡后,通过常温区域灌注或离体灌注,从更远的距离获得肺,并增加捐赠的使用。ABO O型患者的差异仍然存在,需要更密切的随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信