Impact of Narrow Anvil Stapler on Graft Vein Length in Right-sided Living-donor Nephrectomy.

IF 1.9 Q3 TRANSPLANTATION
Transplantation Direct Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/TXD.0000000000001837
Hiroshi Noguchi, Yu Sato, Yu Hisadome, Shinsuke Kubo, Keizo Kaku, Yuki Nakafusa, Yoshifumi Miura, Masafumi Nakamura
{"title":"Impact of Narrow Anvil Stapler on Graft Vein Length in Right-sided Living-donor Nephrectomy.","authors":"Hiroshi Noguchi, Yu Sato, Yu Hisadome, Shinsuke Kubo, Keizo Kaku, Yuki Nakafusa, Yoshifumi Miura, Masafumi Nakamura","doi":"10.1097/TXD.0000000000001837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right-sided living donor nephrectomy presents a challenge because of the shorter renal vein length, which may complicate vascular anastomosis during transplantation. We hypothesized that the use of a narrow anvil stapler could optimize vein preservation by allowing safer and more effective transection closer to the inferior vena cava. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Signia Small Diameter Reload Short with Curved Tip (SDR) and the Tri-Staple 2.0 Reload (TSR) in preserving renal vein length and to evaluate their impact on donor and recipient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 39 right-sided donor nephrectomies performed at 2 institutions between May 2019 and December 2024. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the stapler used: TSR (n = 16) and SDR (n = 23). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences, resulting in a final analysis of 11 TSR and 23 SDR cases. We evaluated renal vein length and overall surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SDR group had significantly longer renal vein lengths than the TSR group (23.0 ± 4.0 versus 17.5 ± 3.9 mm, <i>P</i> < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, or perioperative complications in both donors and recipients. Warm ischemia time, rewarming time, and total ischemia time were also comparable between groups. Early postoperative serum creatinine levels did not differ significantly between recipient groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SDR stapler provided a significant technical advantage in preserving renal vein length in right-sided donor nephrectomy. However, this did not translate into improved recipient outcomes, suggesting that surgical precision and vascular adaptation play a more critical role in transplantation success than vein length alone. Nonetheless, the ability to preserve greater vein length remains a potential advantage, particularly in challenging cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":23225,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Direct","volume":"11 7","pages":"e1837"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Direct","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TXD.0000000000001837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Right-sided living donor nephrectomy presents a challenge because of the shorter renal vein length, which may complicate vascular anastomosis during transplantation. We hypothesized that the use of a narrow anvil stapler could optimize vein preservation by allowing safer and more effective transection closer to the inferior vena cava. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Signia Small Diameter Reload Short with Curved Tip (SDR) and the Tri-Staple 2.0 Reload (TSR) in preserving renal vein length and to evaluate their impact on donor and recipient outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 39 right-sided donor nephrectomies performed at 2 institutions between May 2019 and December 2024. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the stapler used: TSR (n = 16) and SDR (n = 23). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for baseline differences, resulting in a final analysis of 11 TSR and 23 SDR cases. We evaluated renal vein length and overall surgical outcomes.

Results: The SDR group had significantly longer renal vein lengths than the TSR group (23.0 ± 4.0 versus 17.5 ± 3.9 mm, P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, or perioperative complications in both donors and recipients. Warm ischemia time, rewarming time, and total ischemia time were also comparable between groups. Early postoperative serum creatinine levels did not differ significantly between recipient groups.

Conclusions: The SDR stapler provided a significant technical advantage in preserving renal vein length in right-sided donor nephrectomy. However, this did not translate into improved recipient outcomes, suggesting that surgical precision and vascular adaptation play a more critical role in transplantation success than vein length alone. Nonetheless, the ability to preserve greater vein length remains a potential advantage, particularly in challenging cases.

窄砧吻合器对右侧活体肾切除术移植物静脉长度的影响。
背景:右侧活体供肾切除术是一个挑战,因为肾静脉长度较短,可能使移植时血管吻合复杂化。我们假设使用窄砧吻合器可以通过更安全、更有效地靠近下腔静脉进行横断来优化静脉保存。本研究旨在比较Signia Small Diameter Reload Short with Curved Tip (SDR)和Tri-Staple 2.0 Reload (TSR)在保留肾静脉长度方面的有效性,并评估它们对供体和受体预后的影响。方法:我们对2019年5月至2024年12月在2家机构进行的39例右侧供体肾切除术进行了回顾性观察队列研究。根据使用的订书机将患者分为两组:TSR (n = 16)和SDR (n = 23)。应用处理加权逆概率来调整基线差异,最终分析了11例TSR和23例SDR病例。我们评估了肾静脉长度和总体手术结果。结果:SDR组肾静脉长度明显长于TSR组(23.0±4.0 mm比17.5±3.9 mm, P)。结论:SDR吻合器在右侧供肾切除术中保留肾静脉长度具有明显的技术优势。然而,这并没有转化为接受者预后的改善,这表明手术精度和血管适应性在移植成功中比静脉长度单独发挥更关键的作用。尽管如此,能够保持更长的静脉长度仍然是一个潜在的优势,特别是在具有挑战性的病例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation Direct
Transplantation Direct TRANSPLANTATION-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
193
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信