Research status, hotspots and perspectives of artificial intelligence applied to pain management: a bibliometric and visual analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Feng Li, ChangHao Hu, Xu Luo
{"title":"Research status, hotspots and perspectives of artificial intelligence applied to pain management: a bibliometric and visual analysis.","authors":"Feng Li, ChangHao Hu, Xu Luo","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02296-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the advent of big data, artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging as a promising avenue for pain management research. Integrating big data analytics, machine learning, and intelligent algorithms within AI can facilitate several significant advancements in healthcare. These include the ability to provide clinical diagnoses of pain, risk prediction, and the development of precision medicine. The number of articles on the application of AI to pain management is on the rise. However, there needs to be more information regarding the quality of the research output in this area, as well as the current hotspots and trends in research. At the same time, no bibliometric metrics have been identified that assess scientific progress in this area. In order to gain an understanding of the current status and potential future directions in the application of AI within the field of pain management, it is first necessary to undertake a visual and analytical study of the relevant research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A bibliometric and visual analysis was conducted to identify research hotspots and trends in the application of AI in pain management over the past 30 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data information source was the SCI-EXPANDED subset database of the WOS database. A manual search was conducted of all articles and reviews from the database's inception to June 29, 2024. The search was limited to English language sources. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Bibliometrix (an R-Tool of R-Studio). The analysis encompassed a range of aspects related to the global publication status of papers in the field, including countries and regions, institutions, authors, journals, keywords, and co-cited references.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 970 published papers were obtained for this study. The articles were published in 496 journals by 5679 authors affiliated with 2030 academic institutions in 84 countries or regions. From 2014 to 2024, there was a gradual increase in the number of papers published within this field, with 97% of the total published papers. The United States and China contribute the most to this growth. The most prominent research institutions are Harvard University, the University of California system, and Harvard Medical School. At the author level, Mork, Paul Jarle, Bach, and Kerstin of the Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU) were identified as the authors with the highest research output. Breiman, L. of the University of California, Berkeley, emerged as the most influential author, exhibiting the highest co-citation frequency. From the perspective of journals, the Journal of Medical Internet Research, Scientific Reports, PAIN, PLOS ONE, and SPINE are the primary core journals in the field. They have a high number of published papers and co-citation frequency. Furthermore, of the 46,170 co-cited references, Loetsch J's \"Machine learning in pain research,\" published in PAIN in 2018, had the highest number of co-citations, thus making it the most influential article in the study. Combining keywords and co-cited references for analysis leads to the conclusion that using AI for accurate clinical monitoring and risk prediction, clinical diagnosis and classification, and providing personalized treatment plans and care measures for pain has become a current research hotspot and a future trend. Machine learning, deep learning, artificial neural networks, and clinical decision support systems in artificial intelligence are frequently mentioned and commonly used to build predictive models. These are also hot research topics and trends in the field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The field of research on using AI for pain management is experiencing unprecedented growth and development. This study offers a novel perspective on applying AI to pain management, which may inform researchers' selection of potential journals and institutions to collaborate with. Furthermore, this study furnishes researchers with the requisite data to comprehend the present state of research, research focal points, and research tendencies in this field, thereby facilitating the implementation of AI in pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02296-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the advent of big data, artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging as a promising avenue for pain management research. Integrating big data analytics, machine learning, and intelligent algorithms within AI can facilitate several significant advancements in healthcare. These include the ability to provide clinical diagnoses of pain, risk prediction, and the development of precision medicine. The number of articles on the application of AI to pain management is on the rise. However, there needs to be more information regarding the quality of the research output in this area, as well as the current hotspots and trends in research. At the same time, no bibliometric metrics have been identified that assess scientific progress in this area. In order to gain an understanding of the current status and potential future directions in the application of AI within the field of pain management, it is first necessary to undertake a visual and analytical study of the relevant research.

Objectives: A bibliometric and visual analysis was conducted to identify research hotspots and trends in the application of AI in pain management over the past 30 years.

Methods: The data information source was the SCI-EXPANDED subset database of the WOS database. A manual search was conducted of all articles and reviews from the database's inception to June 29, 2024. The search was limited to English language sources. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Bibliometrix (an R-Tool of R-Studio). The analysis encompassed a range of aspects related to the global publication status of papers in the field, including countries and regions, institutions, authors, journals, keywords, and co-cited references.

Results: A total of 970 published papers were obtained for this study. The articles were published in 496 journals by 5679 authors affiliated with 2030 academic institutions in 84 countries or regions. From 2014 to 2024, there was a gradual increase in the number of papers published within this field, with 97% of the total published papers. The United States and China contribute the most to this growth. The most prominent research institutions are Harvard University, the University of California system, and Harvard Medical School. At the author level, Mork, Paul Jarle, Bach, and Kerstin of the Norwegian University of Science & Technology (NTNU) were identified as the authors with the highest research output. Breiman, L. of the University of California, Berkeley, emerged as the most influential author, exhibiting the highest co-citation frequency. From the perspective of journals, the Journal of Medical Internet Research, Scientific Reports, PAIN, PLOS ONE, and SPINE are the primary core journals in the field. They have a high number of published papers and co-citation frequency. Furthermore, of the 46,170 co-cited references, Loetsch J's "Machine learning in pain research," published in PAIN in 2018, had the highest number of co-citations, thus making it the most influential article in the study. Combining keywords and co-cited references for analysis leads to the conclusion that using AI for accurate clinical monitoring and risk prediction, clinical diagnosis and classification, and providing personalized treatment plans and care measures for pain has become a current research hotspot and a future trend. Machine learning, deep learning, artificial neural networks, and clinical decision support systems in artificial intelligence are frequently mentioned and commonly used to build predictive models. These are also hot research topics and trends in the field.

Conclusions: The field of research on using AI for pain management is experiencing unprecedented growth and development. This study offers a novel perspective on applying AI to pain management, which may inform researchers' selection of potential journals and institutions to collaborate with. Furthermore, this study furnishes researchers with the requisite data to comprehend the present state of research, research focal points, and research tendencies in this field, thereby facilitating the implementation of AI in pain management.

人工智能在疼痛管理中的研究现状、热点与展望:文献计量与视觉分析。
背景:随着大数据的出现,人工智能(AI)正迅速成为疼痛管理研究的一个有前途的途径。在人工智能中集成大数据分析、机器学习和智能算法可以促进医疗保健领域的几项重大进步。这些能力包括提供疼痛的临床诊断、风险预测和精准医学的发展。关于人工智能在疼痛管理中的应用的文章越来越多。然而,这一领域的研究成果质量以及当前的研究热点和趋势还需要更多的信息。与此同时,还没有确定文献计量指标来评估这一领域的科学进展。为了了解人工智能在疼痛管理领域的应用现状和潜在的未来方向,首先有必要对相关研究进行可视化和分析性研究。目的:通过文献计量和可视化分析,确定近30年来人工智能在疼痛管理中应用的研究热点和趋势。方法:数据信息源为WOS数据库的SCI-EXPANDED子集数据库。人工检索从数据库建立到2024年6月29日的所有文章和评论。搜索仅限于英语语言来源。使用VOSviewer、CiteSpace和Bibliometrix (R-Studio的R-Tool)进行文献计量学分析。该分析涵盖了与该领域论文的全球出版状况相关的一系列方面,包括国家和地区、机构、作者、期刊、关键词和共同被引参考文献。结果:本研究共获得论文970篇。这些论文由84个国家或地区的2030个学术机构的5679名作者发表在496种期刊上。从2014年到2024年,该领域的论文发表数量逐渐增加,占总发表论文的97%。美国和中国对这一增长贡献最大。最著名的研究机构是哈佛大学、加州大学系统和哈佛医学院。在作者层面,挪威科技大学(NTNU)的Mork、Paul Jarle、Bach和Kerstin被确定为研究产出最高的作者。加州大学伯克利分校的Breiman是最有影响力的作者,他的共被引频次最高。从期刊的角度来看,《医学互联网研究杂志》、《科学报告》、《PAIN》、《PLOS ONE》和《SPINE》是该领域主要的核心期刊。他们发表的论文数量和共被引频次都很高。此外,在共被引的46,170篇参考文献中,Loetsch J于2018年发表在《pain》杂志上的《疼痛研究中的机器学习》(Machine learning in pain research)的共被引次数最多,因此成为该研究中最有影响力的文章。结合关键词和共被引文献进行分析,得出结论:利用人工智能对疼痛进行准确的临床监测和风险预测、临床诊断和分类,并提供个性化的治疗方案和护理措施已成为当前的研究热点和未来的发展趋势。人工智能中的机器学习、深度学习、人工神经网络和临床决策支持系统经常被提及,并且通常用于构建预测模型。这些也是该领域的研究热点和趋势。结论:人工智能用于疼痛管理的研究领域正在经历前所未有的增长和发展。这项研究为将人工智能应用于疼痛管理提供了一个新的视角,这可能会为研究人员选择潜在的期刊和机构提供信息。此外,本研究为研究人员了解该领域的研究现状、研究重点和研究趋势提供了必要的数据,从而促进人工智能在疼痛管理中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信