Short-Term Outcomes of Paramedic Treat and Discharge: A Cohort Study of Emergency Service Use in Ontario, Canada.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ryan P Strum, Shawn Mondoux, Andrew Costa, Brent McLeod, Tim Dodd, Katie Turcotte, Paul Miller
{"title":"Short-Term Outcomes of Paramedic Treat and Discharge: A Cohort Study of Emergency Service Use in Ontario, Canada.","authors":"Ryan P Strum, Shawn Mondoux, Andrew Costa, Brent McLeod, Tim Dodd, Katie Turcotte, Paul Miller","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2525528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Canadian emergency departments (EDs) are under unprecedented strain due to record-high patient volumes and limited capacity expansion. To mitigate overcrowding, Ontario implemented a paramedic 'treat and discharge' model, enabling paramedics to assess, treat, and discharge patients with resolved seizure, hypoglycemia, or supraventricular tachydysrhythmia under specific clinical criteria. This study evaluates the short-term safety and effectiveness of this model by examining subsequent emergency service utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked data from paramedic services in southwestern Ontario and a provincial health care database from June 1, 2023, to November 15, 2024. All patients discharged by paramedics under this model were included. We analyzed the incidence of emergency service use (9-1-1 calls and ED visits), mortality, and other health care utilization within seven days post-discharge, categorized by the reason for service use as related-cause and all-cause. We computed descriptive statistics and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 123 patients, 11 (8.9%) required emergency services for a related-cause within seven days. Seizure patients had the highest incidence of related emergency service utilization (<i>n</i> = 7), followed by hypoglycemia (<i>n</i> = 4), while tachydysrhythmia had none. All patients visiting an ED either following a 9-1-1 call or by walk-in for a related-cause were discharged. The overall incidence of all-cause emergency service use was 14 patients (11.4%). There were no deaths in the community or ED within seven days. Seizure patients had a higher risk of using emergency services after discharge if they had called for paramedics within the 14 days prior (RR 6.80, 2.44-18.96) or received paramedic medications (RR 5.83, 2.89-12.21). No significant risk increase was observed for patients tended to by primary care paramedics compared to advanced care, or those presenting with an emergent acuity on initial contact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The low incidence of subsequent emergency service use supports the safety and feasibility of the paramedic treat and discharge model for select patients. These findings highlight the potential of alternative care models that optimize paramedic and ED resources and suggest that treat and discharge directives could be expanded to additional patient cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2525528","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Canadian emergency departments (EDs) are under unprecedented strain due to record-high patient volumes and limited capacity expansion. To mitigate overcrowding, Ontario implemented a paramedic 'treat and discharge' model, enabling paramedics to assess, treat, and discharge patients with resolved seizure, hypoglycemia, or supraventricular tachydysrhythmia under specific clinical criteria. This study evaluates the short-term safety and effectiveness of this model by examining subsequent emergency service utilization.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked data from paramedic services in southwestern Ontario and a provincial health care database from June 1, 2023, to November 15, 2024. All patients discharged by paramedics under this model were included. We analyzed the incidence of emergency service use (9-1-1 calls and ED visits), mortality, and other health care utilization within seven days post-discharge, categorized by the reason for service use as related-cause and all-cause. We computed descriptive statistics and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Among 123 patients, 11 (8.9%) required emergency services for a related-cause within seven days. Seizure patients had the highest incidence of related emergency service utilization (n = 7), followed by hypoglycemia (n = 4), while tachydysrhythmia had none. All patients visiting an ED either following a 9-1-1 call or by walk-in for a related-cause were discharged. The overall incidence of all-cause emergency service use was 14 patients (11.4%). There were no deaths in the community or ED within seven days. Seizure patients had a higher risk of using emergency services after discharge if they had called for paramedics within the 14 days prior (RR 6.80, 2.44-18.96) or received paramedic medications (RR 5.83, 2.89-12.21). No significant risk increase was observed for patients tended to by primary care paramedics compared to advanced care, or those presenting with an emergent acuity on initial contact.

Conclusions: The low incidence of subsequent emergency service use supports the safety and feasibility of the paramedic treat and discharge model for select patients. These findings highlight the potential of alternative care models that optimize paramedic and ED resources and suggest that treat and discharge directives could be expanded to additional patient cohorts.

护理人员治疗和出院的短期结果:加拿大安大略省紧急服务使用的队列研究。
目标:由于创纪录的患者数量和有限的能力扩张,加拿大急诊科(EDs)面临前所未有的压力。为了缓解过度拥挤,安大略省实施了护理人员“治疗和出院”模式,使护理人员能够根据特定的临床标准评估、治疗和出院解决癫痫、低血糖或室上性心动过速的患者。本研究通过检查后续应急服务的使用情况来评估该模型的短期安全性和有效性。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用了2023年6月1日至2024年11月15日期间安大略省西南部护理人员服务和省级卫生保健数据库的相关数据。所有在该模型下由护理人员出院的患者均被纳入。我们分析了出院后7天内急诊服务使用(9-1-1电话和急诊就诊)、死亡率和其他医疗保健利用的发生率,并将服务使用的原因分为相关原因和全因原因。我们以95%置信区间(ci)计算描述性统计和相对危险度(RR)。结果:123例患者中,11例(8.9%)在7天内因相关原因需要急诊服务。癫痫患者相关急诊服务使用率最高(n = 7),其次是低血糖(n = 4),而心动过速无。所有到急诊室就诊的病人,要么是接到911报警,要么是因相关原因自行就诊,都已出院。全因急诊服务使用的总发生率为14例(11.4%)。7天内社区和急诊科均无死亡病例。如果癫痫患者在出院前14天内呼叫过护理人员(RR 6.80, 2.44 - 18.96)或接受过护理人员药物治疗(RR 5.83, 2.89 - 12.21),则他们在出院后使用急救服务的风险更高。与高级护理相比,由初级护理人员护理的患者或首次接触时出现紧急急症的患者未观察到显著的风险增加。结论:后续急诊服务使用的低发生率支持了护理人员治疗和出院模式对选定患者的安全性和可行性。这些发现强调了优化护理人员和急诊科资源的替代护理模式的潜力,并建议将治疗和出院指示扩展到其他患者队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信