Which Factors Affect Functional Outcomes and Survival in Metastatic Humeral Fractures Treated With Nails?

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-29 DOI:10.1111/os.70101
Ebubekir Eravsar, Ali Gulec, Sadettin Ciftci, Numan Mercan, Selim Safali, Bahattin Kerem Aydin
{"title":"Which Factors Affect Functional Outcomes and Survival in Metastatic Humeral Fractures Treated With Nails?","authors":"Ebubekir Eravsar, Ali Gulec, Sadettin Ciftci, Numan Mercan, Selim Safali, Bahattin Kerem Aydin","doi":"10.1111/os.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intramedullary nailing is a treatment method for metastatic humerus fractures that stabilizes a large area while minimizing damage to the surrounding soft tissues. However, the results of this treatment may vary depending on certain factors. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing functional outcomes and survival in patients with pathological humeral fractures treated using humeral nails.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 41 patients who underwent humeral nailing for metastatic pathological humerus fractures between 2009 and 2024. Functional outcomes were compared based on factors such as gender, age, cancer type, another pathological fracture surgery, visceral metastases, cancer diagnosis prior to fracture, fracture type and location, and cement use, using VAS improvement, MSTS, KPS scores, and ROM measurement. Survival analysis was performed considering these same factors. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In younger patients, better VAS improvement(p = 0.001), MSTS(p = 0.038), KPS(p = 0.028), and ROM(p = 0.045) were observed compared to those 65 and older. Cancer type and visceral metastases negatively impacted MSTS(p = 0.007, p = 0.049) and KPS(p = 0.002, p = 0.022). Actual fractures showed greater VAS improvement than impending fractures(p = 0.002), and shaft fractures had greater VAS improvement than proximal fractures(p = 0.037). Unknown cancer diagnosis prior to fracture led to better VAS improvement(p = 0.008), MSTS(p = 0.018), KPS(p = 0.023), and ROM(p = 0.006). Rapid growth tumor(p < 0.001) and visceral metastasis(p = 0.007) were independently associated with poor survival. No significant effects were seen for gender or cement use on functional outcomes and mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although intramedullary nails are feasible implants for humeral pathological fractures, there are significant factors that affect their functional outcomes and survival. Actual fractures and shaft fractures showed better pain relief. Patients with a known cancer diagnosis prior to fracture and older patients had poor functional outcomes. Rapid cancer type and visceral metastasis negatively affect both functional outcomes and survival. Although cement use carries a risk of thrombosis, no significant changes in mortality and functional outcomes were observed with cement use.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2342-2349"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70101","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intramedullary nailing is a treatment method for metastatic humerus fractures that stabilizes a large area while minimizing damage to the surrounding soft tissues. However, the results of this treatment may vary depending on certain factors. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing functional outcomes and survival in patients with pathological humeral fractures treated using humeral nails.

Methods: This retrospective study included 41 patients who underwent humeral nailing for metastatic pathological humerus fractures between 2009 and 2024. Functional outcomes were compared based on factors such as gender, age, cancer type, another pathological fracture surgery, visceral metastases, cancer diagnosis prior to fracture, fracture type and location, and cement use, using VAS improvement, MSTS, KPS scores, and ROM measurement. Survival analysis was performed considering these same factors. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Chi-square test, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Cox regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with mortality.

Results: In younger patients, better VAS improvement(p = 0.001), MSTS(p = 0.038), KPS(p = 0.028), and ROM(p = 0.045) were observed compared to those 65 and older. Cancer type and visceral metastases negatively impacted MSTS(p = 0.007, p = 0.049) and KPS(p = 0.002, p = 0.022). Actual fractures showed greater VAS improvement than impending fractures(p = 0.002), and shaft fractures had greater VAS improvement than proximal fractures(p = 0.037). Unknown cancer diagnosis prior to fracture led to better VAS improvement(p = 0.008), MSTS(p = 0.018), KPS(p = 0.023), and ROM(p = 0.006). Rapid growth tumor(p < 0.001) and visceral metastasis(p = 0.007) were independently associated with poor survival. No significant effects were seen for gender or cement use on functional outcomes and mortality.

Conclusion: Although intramedullary nails are feasible implants for humeral pathological fractures, there are significant factors that affect their functional outcomes and survival. Actual fractures and shaft fractures showed better pain relief. Patients with a known cancer diagnosis prior to fracture and older patients had poor functional outcomes. Rapid cancer type and visceral metastasis negatively affect both functional outcomes and survival. Although cement use carries a risk of thrombosis, no significant changes in mortality and functional outcomes were observed with cement use.

Level of evidence: IV.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

哪些因素影响转移性肱骨骨折的功能结局和生存?
目的:髓内钉是一种治疗转移性肱骨骨折的方法,在稳定大面积的同时尽量减少对周围软组织的损伤。然而,这种治疗的结果可能会因某些因素而有所不同。本研究旨在探讨应用肱骨钉治疗病理性肱骨骨折患者的功能结局和生存的影响因素。方法:本回顾性研究包括41例2009年至2024年间接受肱骨钉治疗转移性病理性肱骨骨折的患者。功能结局根据性别、年龄、癌症类型、另一病理性骨折手术、内脏转移、骨折前癌症诊断、骨折类型和位置、水泥使用等因素进行比较,采用VAS改善、MSTS、KPS评分和ROM测量。考虑这些因素进行生存分析。统计分析包括Mann-Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、卡方检验和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线。采用Cox回归分析确定与死亡率相关的因素。结果:与65岁及以上患者相比,年轻患者VAS改善(p = 0.001)、MSTS(p = 0.038)、KPS(p = 0.028)和ROM(p = 0.045)更好。癌症类型和内脏转移对MSTS(p = 0.007, p = 0.049)和KPS(p = 0.002, p = 0.022)有负面影响。实际骨折VAS改善程度高于临近骨折(p = 0.002),轴骨折VAS改善程度高于近端骨折(p = 0.037)。骨折前未知癌症诊断导致VAS改善(p = 0.008)、MSTS(p = 0.018)、KPS(p = 0.023)和ROM(p = 0.006)更好。结论:髓内钉是治疗肱骨病理性骨折的一种可行的植入物,但其功能结局和生存期存在明显的影响因素。实际骨折和轴骨折的疼痛缓解效果较好。骨折前已知癌症诊断的患者和老年患者的功能预后较差。快速的癌症类型和内脏转移对功能预后和生存都有负面影响。虽然使用水泥有血栓形成的风险,但没有观察到使用水泥对死亡率和功能结局的显著变化。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信