DNA damage in oral mucosal epithelial cells cultured in complex and xenobiotic-free media: A comparison study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Mutagenesis Pub Date : 2025-06-28 DOI:10.1093/mutage/geaf008
Joao Victor Cabral, Sona Vodenkova, Kristyna Tomasova, Ludmila Vodickova, Naouale El Yamani, Elise Rundén Pran, Maria Dusinska, Adam Safanda, Katerina Jirsova
{"title":"DNA damage in oral mucosal epithelial cells cultured in complex and xenobiotic-free media: A comparison study.","authors":"Joao Victor Cabral, Sona Vodenkova, Kristyna Tomasova, Ludmila Vodickova, Naouale El Yamani, Elise Rundén Pran, Maria Dusinska, Adam Safanda, Katerina Jirsova","doi":"10.1093/mutage/geaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we evaluated the genomic stability of oral mucosal epithelial cells (OMECs) cultured in complex media (COM) and xenobiotic-free media (XF) to assess their potential clinical application for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) treatments. OMECs serve as a promising autologous cell source for bilateral LSCD treatment, offering an alternative to limbal epithelial cells (LECs). However, genomic integrity is crucial to ensure the long-term success of transplanted cells. We performed micronucleus (MNi) tests and comet assays to compare DNA damage in OMECs cultured in both media types. The results indicated no significant differences in cell morphology, viability, or size between the two conditions. The MNi frequency was similar, with 5.67 and 6.17 MNi per 1,000 cells in COM and XF conditions, respectively. Comet assay results showed low levels of strand breaks (SBs) and oxidized DNA lesions in both media, with XF showing a slightly lower, albeit statistically insignificant, percentage of tail DNA for net Fpg-sensitive sites. Our findings suggest that OMECs can be effectively cultivated in either COM or XF media without inducing significant DNA damage, supporting the potential use of XF media in clinical settings to reduce contamination risks. This study underscores the importance of genomic stability in cultured cells for ocular surface transplantation, contributing valuable insights into optimizing culture conditions for safer and more effective clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":18889,"journal":{"name":"Mutagenesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the genomic stability of oral mucosal epithelial cells (OMECs) cultured in complex media (COM) and xenobiotic-free media (XF) to assess their potential clinical application for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) treatments. OMECs serve as a promising autologous cell source for bilateral LSCD treatment, offering an alternative to limbal epithelial cells (LECs). However, genomic integrity is crucial to ensure the long-term success of transplanted cells. We performed micronucleus (MNi) tests and comet assays to compare DNA damage in OMECs cultured in both media types. The results indicated no significant differences in cell morphology, viability, or size between the two conditions. The MNi frequency was similar, with 5.67 and 6.17 MNi per 1,000 cells in COM and XF conditions, respectively. Comet assay results showed low levels of strand breaks (SBs) and oxidized DNA lesions in both media, with XF showing a slightly lower, albeit statistically insignificant, percentage of tail DNA for net Fpg-sensitive sites. Our findings suggest that OMECs can be effectively cultivated in either COM or XF media without inducing significant DNA damage, supporting the potential use of XF media in clinical settings to reduce contamination risks. This study underscores the importance of genomic stability in cultured cells for ocular surface transplantation, contributing valuable insights into optimizing culture conditions for safer and more effective clinical applications.

口腔粘膜上皮细胞DNA损伤在复杂和无外源物培养基中的比较研究。
在这项研究中,我们评估了在复合培养基(COM)和无外源培养基(XF)中培养的口腔粘膜上皮细胞(OMECs)的基因组稳定性,以评估它们在角膜缘干细胞缺乏症(LSCD)治疗中的潜在临床应用。OMECs作为双侧LSCD治疗的一种有前途的自体细胞来源,提供了一种替代角膜缘上皮细胞(LECs)的方法。然而,基因组完整性对于确保移植细胞的长期成功至关重要。我们进行了微核(MNi)试验和彗星试验来比较两种培养基中培养的omec的DNA损伤。结果表明,在两种条件下,细胞形态、活力或大小没有显著差异。在COM和XF条件下,MNi频率相似,分别为5.67和6.17 MNi / 1000细胞。彗星分析结果显示,两种培养基中的链断裂(SBs)和氧化DNA损伤水平较低,XF显示净fg敏感位点的尾部DNA百分比略低,尽管统计上不显著。我们的研究结果表明,OMECs可以在COM或XF培养基中有效培养,而不会引起明显的DNA损伤,这支持了XF培养基在临床环境中降低污染风险的潜在应用。本研究强调了眼表移植培养细胞基因组稳定性的重要性,为优化培养条件以实现更安全、更有效的临床应用提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mutagenesis
Mutagenesis 生物-毒理学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mutagenesis is an international multi-disciplinary journal designed to bring together research aimed at the identification, characterization and elucidation of the mechanisms of action of physical, chemical and biological agents capable of producing genetic change in living organisms and the study of the consequences of such changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信