Revisiting Rhinitis Medicamentosa: Examining the Evidence on Topical Nasal Decongestants.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Martina Hagen, Gabor Varbiro, Elisa Montanari, Mariane Ballerini Fernandes
{"title":"Revisiting Rhinitis Medicamentosa: Examining the Evidence on Topical Nasal Decongestants.","authors":"Martina Hagen, Gabor Varbiro, Elisa Montanari, Mariane Ballerini Fernandes","doi":"10.1177/08971900251350510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Over-the-counter topical nasal decongestants are effective and well-tolerated treatments for the temporary relief of nasal congestion, a symptom that can impair quality of life. Their duration of use is limited owing to potential for rhinitis medicamentosa (RM) or rebound congestion (RC), despite uncertainties around the clinical occurrence or onset of these phenomena. <b>Objective:</b> To investigate the clinical occurrence and onset of RM, RC or tolerance with topical nasal decongestants to inform evidence-based recommendation practices for pharmacists and ensure patients do not forego potentially beneficial treatments. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search was conducted with ProQuest to identify and synthesize evidence on RM, RC or tolerance with nasal decongestant sprays or drops. A respiratory specialist and community pharmacist provided clinical perspectives. <b>Results:</b> Eighteen articles were assessed, reporting 13 studies with oxymetazoline, five studies with xylometazoline. There was no evidence of RM or RC after 7 days with oxymetazoline (up to 400 μg total daily dose) or up to 10-days with xylometazoline (840 μg total daily dose). Well-designed studies suggested no occurrence of RM, RC or tolerance with up to 4 weeks of oxymetazoline. No studies evaluating naphazoline, phenylephrine or ephedrine were identified. <b>Conclusion:</b> Oxymetazoline and xylometazoline are highly effective at rapidly improving nasal congestion and have well-established safety profiles. Well-designed studies yielded no evidence of RM, RC or tolerance when used short-term at commonly recommended dosing and frequency. Since some patients may exceed the duration of use in the label, pharmacists can play a vital role in counseling patients on proper intranasal decongestant use and treatment duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900251350510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900251350510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over-the-counter topical nasal decongestants are effective and well-tolerated treatments for the temporary relief of nasal congestion, a symptom that can impair quality of life. Their duration of use is limited owing to potential for rhinitis medicamentosa (RM) or rebound congestion (RC), despite uncertainties around the clinical occurrence or onset of these phenomena. Objective: To investigate the clinical occurrence and onset of RM, RC or tolerance with topical nasal decongestants to inform evidence-based recommendation practices for pharmacists and ensure patients do not forego potentially beneficial treatments. Methods: A literature search was conducted with ProQuest to identify and synthesize evidence on RM, RC or tolerance with nasal decongestant sprays or drops. A respiratory specialist and community pharmacist provided clinical perspectives. Results: Eighteen articles were assessed, reporting 13 studies with oxymetazoline, five studies with xylometazoline. There was no evidence of RM or RC after 7 days with oxymetazoline (up to 400 μg total daily dose) or up to 10-days with xylometazoline (840 μg total daily dose). Well-designed studies suggested no occurrence of RM, RC or tolerance with up to 4 weeks of oxymetazoline. No studies evaluating naphazoline, phenylephrine or ephedrine were identified. Conclusion: Oxymetazoline and xylometazoline are highly effective at rapidly improving nasal congestion and have well-established safety profiles. Well-designed studies yielded no evidence of RM, RC or tolerance when used short-term at commonly recommended dosing and frequency. Since some patients may exceed the duration of use in the label, pharmacists can play a vital role in counseling patients on proper intranasal decongestant use and treatment duration.

重访药物性鼻炎:检查局部减充血剂的证据。
背景:非处方局部鼻塞解充血剂是暂时缓解鼻塞的有效且耐受性良好的治疗方法,鼻塞是一种可能影响生活质量的症状。由于潜在的药物性鼻炎(RM)或反弹性充血(RC),尽管这些现象的临床发生或发病不确定,但它们的使用时间有限。目的:调查外用减充血剂的RM、RC或耐受性的临床发生和发作情况,为药剂师提供循证推荐实践,并确保患者不放弃可能有益的治疗。方法:使用ProQuest进行文献检索,对减充血剂喷雾剂或滴剂的RM、RC或耐受性进行鉴定和综合证据。一位呼吸系统专家和社区药剂师提供了临床观点。结果:18篇文章被评估,报告了13项与羟美唑啉有关的研究,5项与木基美唑啉有关的研究。服用羟美唑啉7天(每日总剂量达400 μg)或服用木美唑啉10天(每日总剂量达840 μg)后无RM或RC的证据。精心设计的研究表明,在长达4周的oxymetazoline治疗中,没有发生RM, RC或耐受性。未发现评价萘唑啉、苯肾上腺素或麻黄碱的研究。结论:氧美唑啉和木美唑啉对鼻塞的快速改善具有良好的疗效和安全性。设计良好的研究表明,在通常推荐的剂量和频率下短期使用时,没有RM, RC或耐受性的证据。由于一些患者可能会超过标签上的使用时间,药剂师可以在咨询患者正确使用鼻内减充血剂和治疗时间方面发挥至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信