{"title":"RANO 2.0: critical updates and practical considerations for radiological assessment in neuro-oncology.","authors":"Akihiko Sakata, Yasutaka Fushimi, Sonoko Oshima, Megumi Uto, Yohei Mineharu, Satoshi Nakajima, Sachi Okuchi, Takayuki Yamamoto, Sayo Otani, Satoshi Ikeda, Shigeki Takada, Takashi Mizowaki, Yoshiki Arakawa, Yuji Nakamoto","doi":"10.1007/s11604-025-01821-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Appropriate response assessment criteria are crucial for accurate evaluation of clinical trial outcomes, and numerous criteria have been proposed to address this need. With the introduction of Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria version 2.0 (RANO 2.0) in 2023, response assessment in gliomas has evolved significantly, requiring both clinicians and radiologists to develop a comprehensive understanding of its modifications and implementation. This review first provides an overview of standard management and imaging schedule in glioma treatment. We then review the basic framework of RANO 2.0, inherited from previous response criteria, with particular emphasis on major modifications to this framework: the implementation of the Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol and the adoption of post-radiation scan as the baseline scan. Additionally, we analyze critical changes in response evaluation and interpretation, specifically focusing on the role of preliminary progressive disease assessment with confirmation scans, and the elimination of T2/FLAIR lesion measurements from enhancing tumor assessment. Through illustrative clinical cases, we demonstrate the practical application of these modifications and discuss the implementation of three distinct imaging-based categories: enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and tumors with both enhancing and non-enhancing components (in short, mixed tumor). This comprehensive narrative review provides clinicians with practical guidance for implementing RANO 2.0 in their clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"1557-1574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-025-01821-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Appropriate response assessment criteria are crucial for accurate evaluation of clinical trial outcomes, and numerous criteria have been proposed to address this need. With the introduction of Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria version 2.0 (RANO 2.0) in 2023, response assessment in gliomas has evolved significantly, requiring both clinicians and radiologists to develop a comprehensive understanding of its modifications and implementation. This review first provides an overview of standard management and imaging schedule in glioma treatment. We then review the basic framework of RANO 2.0, inherited from previous response criteria, with particular emphasis on major modifications to this framework: the implementation of the Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol and the adoption of post-radiation scan as the baseline scan. Additionally, we analyze critical changes in response evaluation and interpretation, specifically focusing on the role of preliminary progressive disease assessment with confirmation scans, and the elimination of T2/FLAIR lesion measurements from enhancing tumor assessment. Through illustrative clinical cases, we demonstrate the practical application of these modifications and discuss the implementation of three distinct imaging-based categories: enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, and tumors with both enhancing and non-enhancing components (in short, mixed tumor). This comprehensive narrative review provides clinicians with practical guidance for implementing RANO 2.0 in their clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.