S Giuliano, A Piccirilli, J Angelini, F Patriarca, R Fanin, L Martini, T Semenzin, M Fanin, S Lanini, R A Bonomo, M Perilli, C Tascini
{"title":"<i>Escherichia coli</i> producing AmpC DHA-1 bacteraemia in neutropenic leukemic patient: continuous infusion ceftazidime/avibactam as a carbapenem sparing regimen.","authors":"S Giuliano, A Piccirilli, J Angelini, F Patriarca, R Fanin, L Martini, T Semenzin, M Fanin, S Lanini, R A Bonomo, M Perilli, C Tascini","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong><i>Escherichia coli</i> resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, primarily due to the production of ESBLs and AmpC β-lactamases, poses a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) has emerged as a potential carbapenem-sparing option, though data on its efficacy against AmpC-producing Enterobacterales remain limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report a case of bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by an <i>E. coli</i> strain harbouring the plasmid-mediated AmpC enzyme DHA-1 in a neutropenic patient following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The strain was characterized via whole-genome sequencing and conjugation assays. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was used to guide a continuous infusion CZA regimen in the context of augmented renal clearance (ARC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient responded favourably to CZA therapy (2.5 g every 8 h via continuous infusion for 9 days), with rapid microbiological clearance and clinical improvement. TDM confirmed therapeutic plasma concentrations of both ceftazidime (29.57 mg/L) and avibactam (5.52 mg/L). Genomic analysis revealed multiple resistance genes (<i>blaDHA-1</i>, <i>qnrB4</i>, <i>mphA</i>, <i>dfrA7</i>) and virulence factors, with the isolate identified as <i>E. coli</i> ST442, serotype O174:H9. The early switch from meropenem to CZA may have contributed to microbiota preservation and prevented subsequent infection by carbapenemase-producing <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, for which the patient was colonized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This case illustrates the clinical utility of a carbapenem-sparing strategy guided by TDM in a high-risk, ARC patient with an AmpC-producing <i>E. coli</i> BSI. Continuous infusion CZA achieved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets associated with therapeutic success, offering a promising alternative to carbapenems while mitigating the risk of resistance development and microbiota disruption.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 3","pages":"dlaf109"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12203789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Escherichia coli resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, primarily due to the production of ESBLs and AmpC β-lactamases, poses a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) has emerged as a potential carbapenem-sparing option, though data on its efficacy against AmpC-producing Enterobacterales remain limited.
Methods: We report a case of bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by an E. coli strain harbouring the plasmid-mediated AmpC enzyme DHA-1 in a neutropenic patient following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The strain was characterized via whole-genome sequencing and conjugation assays. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was used to guide a continuous infusion CZA regimen in the context of augmented renal clearance (ARC).
Results: The patient responded favourably to CZA therapy (2.5 g every 8 h via continuous infusion for 9 days), with rapid microbiological clearance and clinical improvement. TDM confirmed therapeutic plasma concentrations of both ceftazidime (29.57 mg/L) and avibactam (5.52 mg/L). Genomic analysis revealed multiple resistance genes (blaDHA-1, qnrB4, mphA, dfrA7) and virulence factors, with the isolate identified as E. coli ST442, serotype O174:H9. The early switch from meropenem to CZA may have contributed to microbiota preservation and prevented subsequent infection by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae, for which the patient was colonized.
Conclusions: This case illustrates the clinical utility of a carbapenem-sparing strategy guided by TDM in a high-risk, ARC patient with an AmpC-producing E. coli BSI. Continuous infusion CZA achieved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets associated with therapeutic success, offering a promising alternative to carbapenems while mitigating the risk of resistance development and microbiota disruption.