New health taxes in Ghana: a qualitative study exploring potential public support.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katherine E Smith, Mark Hellowell, Divine D Logo, Robert Marten, Arti Singh
{"title":"New health taxes in Ghana: a qualitative study exploring potential public support.","authors":"Katherine E Smith, Mark Hellowell, Divine D Logo, Robert Marten, Arti Singh","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the context of a fiscal crisis and health pressures, Ghana's government have been exploring additional pro-health taxes. The World Health Organization and World Bank support health taxes as 'win-win' policies that can, if designed effectively, simultaneously improve health and raise revenue for health spending. However, international evidence shows that health taxes can meet political and public opposition. Yet, there is little research that empirically examines public views of health taxes. We compared policy stakeholders' perceptions of Ghanaian public support for health taxes with public views, seeking to understand the basis for potential public opposition, the extent to which evidence can shape public views, and whether tax framing and design influences public support. We undertook 28 semi-structured key informant interviews with stakeholders (from government, advocacy and business groups) and five focus groups with 38 members of the public (purposefully selected for diversity in gender, age, ethnicity, occupation and social background). We employed an innovative deliberative design for the focus groups, which enabled us to explore how public views responded to contrasting health tax 'frames'. Stakeholders generally believed public support for health taxes was low, especially for more widely consumed products. Yet most focus group participants expressed strong support for health taxes, especially those targeting (more widely-consumed) sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). Support increased when health taxes were framed as measures to improve public health and/or create a fairer tax system, and when commitments were made to using resulting revenue for health spending (known as 'earmarking' or hypothecation). However, stakeholders and members of the public shared a concern that business influence in Ghanaian politics presents a key barrier to implementing effective health taxes sustainably. Overall, our findings suggest that health taxes with a clearly-framed health rationale could command strong Ghanaian public support but likely require effective advocacy to overcome political barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf042","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the context of a fiscal crisis and health pressures, Ghana's government have been exploring additional pro-health taxes. The World Health Organization and World Bank support health taxes as 'win-win' policies that can, if designed effectively, simultaneously improve health and raise revenue for health spending. However, international evidence shows that health taxes can meet political and public opposition. Yet, there is little research that empirically examines public views of health taxes. We compared policy stakeholders' perceptions of Ghanaian public support for health taxes with public views, seeking to understand the basis for potential public opposition, the extent to which evidence can shape public views, and whether tax framing and design influences public support. We undertook 28 semi-structured key informant interviews with stakeholders (from government, advocacy and business groups) and five focus groups with 38 members of the public (purposefully selected for diversity in gender, age, ethnicity, occupation and social background). We employed an innovative deliberative design for the focus groups, which enabled us to explore how public views responded to contrasting health tax 'frames'. Stakeholders generally believed public support for health taxes was low, especially for more widely consumed products. Yet most focus group participants expressed strong support for health taxes, especially those targeting (more widely-consumed) sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). Support increased when health taxes were framed as measures to improve public health and/or create a fairer tax system, and when commitments were made to using resulting revenue for health spending (known as 'earmarking' or hypothecation). However, stakeholders and members of the public shared a concern that business influence in Ghanaian politics presents a key barrier to implementing effective health taxes sustainably. Overall, our findings suggest that health taxes with a clearly-framed health rationale could command strong Ghanaian public support but likely require effective advocacy to overcome political barriers.

加纳的新卫生税:一项探讨潜在公众支持的定性研究。
在财政危机和健康压力的背景下,加纳政府一直在探索增加有利于健康的税收。世界卫生组织和世界银行支持卫生税作为“双赢”政策,如果设计有效,可以同时改善健康和增加卫生支出的收入。然而,国际证据表明,卫生税可能会遭到政治和公众的反对。然而,很少有实证研究调查公众对医疗税的看法。我们比较了政策利益相关者对加纳公众支持卫生税的看法与公众观点,试图了解潜在公众反对的基础,证据可以在多大程度上影响公众观点,以及税收框架和设计是否影响公众支持。我们与利益相关者(来自政府、倡导和商业团体)进行了28次半结构化的关键信息访谈,并与38名公众成员(有目的地选择性别、年龄、种族、职业和社会背景的多样性)进行了5次焦点小组访谈。我们为焦点小组采用了创新的审议设计,这使我们能够探索公众对不同医疗税“框架”的看法。利益攸关方普遍认为,公众对卫生税的支持度很低,尤其是对消费范围更广的产品。然而,大多数焦点小组参与者表示强烈支持健康税,特别是针对(更广泛消费的)含糖饮料(SSBs)征收的税。当卫生税被定义为改善公共卫生和/或建立更公平的税收制度的措施,并承诺将由此产生的收入用于卫生支出(称为“指定用途”或抵押)时,支持就会增加。然而,利益攸关方和公众都担心,企业对加纳政治的影响是可持续实施有效卫生税的一个主要障碍。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,具有明确框架的健康基本原理的健康税可以获得加纳公众的大力支持,但可能需要有效的宣传来克服政治障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信