Connor Frey, Mohit Sodhi, Mostafa Fatehi, Abbas Kezouh, Mahyar Etminan
{"title":"Use of medroxyprogesterone acetate and risk of meningiomas: a comparative safety study.","authors":"Connor Frey, Mohit Sodhi, Mostafa Fatehi, Abbas Kezouh, Mahyar Etminan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2526787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medroxyprogesteroneacetate (MPA), a widely used hormonal contraceptive, has been associated with increased risk of meningiomas. However, the risk of meningiomas associated with MPA compared to oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol-levonorgestrel (EE-LNG) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the relative risk of meningiomas in women using MPA versus EE-LNG.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A nested case-control study was conducted using the PharMetrics Plus database (2006-2020). The cohort included new users of MPA and EE-LNG. Incident meningioma cases were matched to controls based on age and calendar time. Conditional logistic regression was used to account for confounders, including prior radiotherapy, hormonal contraceptive use, and obesity.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of meningiomas in MPA users compared to EE-LNG users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><b> </b>Among women using MPA for more than one year, the adjusted IRR for meningiomas was 3.55 (95% CI: 1.85-6.85), indicating a significantly higher risk compared to EE-LNG users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MPAuse is linked to a substantially increased risk of meningiomas, underscoring the importance of assessing its long-term use. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2526787","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Medroxyprogesteroneacetate (MPA), a widely used hormonal contraceptive, has been associated with increased risk of meningiomas. However, the risk of meningiomas associated with MPA compared to oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol-levonorgestrel (EE-LNG) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the relative risk of meningiomas in women using MPA versus EE-LNG.
Research design and methods: A nested case-control study was conducted using the PharMetrics Plus database (2006-2020). The cohort included new users of MPA and EE-LNG. Incident meningioma cases were matched to controls based on age and calendar time. Conditional logistic regression was used to account for confounders, including prior radiotherapy, hormonal contraceptive use, and obesity.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of meningiomas in MPA users compared to EE-LNG users.
Results: Among women using MPA for more than one year, the adjusted IRR for meningiomas was 3.55 (95% CI: 1.85-6.85), indicating a significantly higher risk compared to EE-LNG users.
Conclusions: MPAuse is linked to a substantially increased risk of meningiomas, underscoring the importance of assessing its long-term use. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.