Prevalence and socio-economic disparities in vegetarianism and flexitarianism over 15 years: the Dutch Lifelines Cohort.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yinjie Zhu, Marga C Ocké, Emely de Vet
{"title":"Prevalence and socio-economic disparities in vegetarianism and flexitarianism over 15 years: the Dutch Lifelines Cohort.","authors":"Yinjie Zhu, Marga C Ocké, Emely de Vet","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckaf095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transitioning to more plant-based diets is crucial for both planetary and human health, and ensuring an equitable transition across all socio-economic groups is also important. However, empirical evidence on the prevalence and socio-economic disparities in vegetarianism and flexitarianism over time in the same population is scarce. This study investigated this in a general Dutch adult population over 15 years. From three general assessments of the Dutch Lifelines study, 143 359 participants from assessment 1 (2006-2013), 100 859 participants from assessment 2 (2013-2017), and 55 282 participants from assessment 3 (2019-2024) were included in this study. The dietary identity was self-reported, collected at each assessment, and categorized into following a vegetarian, flexitarian, other, and no special diet. Socio-economic status was indicated by education attainment. The association between socio-economic status and different dietary identities was estimated using multinomial logistic regression. The prevalence of individuals following vegetarian or flexitarian diet doubled over the three assessment periods, with the proportion of vegetarians and flexitarians increasing from 2.02% to 4.11% and from 3.50% to 7.16%, respectively. Across three assessments, lower education attainment was consistently associated with a lower likelihood of following a vegetarian or flexitarian diet. For example, in assessment 1 individuals with low education attainment were 77% (relative risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.23 [0.20-0.25]) less likely to follow a vegetarian diet compared to those with high education attainment. In a Dutch population cohort, we observed an increasing trend of vegetarian and flexitarian diets over 15 years, along with persistent socio-economic inequalities in these diets.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf095","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transitioning to more plant-based diets is crucial for both planetary and human health, and ensuring an equitable transition across all socio-economic groups is also important. However, empirical evidence on the prevalence and socio-economic disparities in vegetarianism and flexitarianism over time in the same population is scarce. This study investigated this in a general Dutch adult population over 15 years. From three general assessments of the Dutch Lifelines study, 143 359 participants from assessment 1 (2006-2013), 100 859 participants from assessment 2 (2013-2017), and 55 282 participants from assessment 3 (2019-2024) were included in this study. The dietary identity was self-reported, collected at each assessment, and categorized into following a vegetarian, flexitarian, other, and no special diet. Socio-economic status was indicated by education attainment. The association between socio-economic status and different dietary identities was estimated using multinomial logistic regression. The prevalence of individuals following vegetarian or flexitarian diet doubled over the three assessment periods, with the proportion of vegetarians and flexitarians increasing from 2.02% to 4.11% and from 3.50% to 7.16%, respectively. Across three assessments, lower education attainment was consistently associated with a lower likelihood of following a vegetarian or flexitarian diet. For example, in assessment 1 individuals with low education attainment were 77% (relative risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.23 [0.20-0.25]) less likely to follow a vegetarian diet compared to those with high education attainment. In a Dutch population cohort, we observed an increasing trend of vegetarian and flexitarian diets over 15 years, along with persistent socio-economic inequalities in these diets.

15年来素食主义和弹性素食主义的流行和社会经济差异:荷兰生命线队列。
向更多植物性饮食过渡对地球和人类健康都至关重要,确保所有社会经济群体公平过渡也很重要。然而,关于素食主义和弹性素食主义在同一人群中的流行程度和社会经济差异的经验证据很少。这项研究对荷兰15年以上的成年人进行了调查。从荷兰生命线研究的三次一般评估中,本研究纳入了评估1(2006-2013)的14359名参与者,评估2(2013-2017)的100859名参与者,评估3(2019-2024)的55282名参与者。饮食特征是自我报告的,在每次评估时收集,并分为素食者、弹性素食者、其他和无特殊饮食。社会经济地位以教育程度来表示。使用多项逻辑回归估计社会经济地位与不同饮食特征之间的关系。在三个评估期间,素食者或弹性素食者的患病率增加了一倍,素食者和弹性素食者的比例分别从2.02%增加到4.11%和3.50%增加到7.16%。在三项评估中,受教育程度较低的人遵循素食或弹性素食的可能性一直较低。例如,在评估1中,受教育程度低的个体比受教育程度高的个体更不可能遵循素食(相对风险比[95% CI]: 0.23[0.20-0.25])。在荷兰人口队列中,我们观察到15年来素食和弹性素食饮食的增长趋势,以及这些饮食中持续存在的社会经济不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信