Axillary Surgical Management in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Delphi Study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Breast Care Pub Date : 2025-05-10 DOI:10.1159/000546267
Michael Stanczyk, Ayat ElSherif, Tiffany Cheung, Alicia Fanning, Amanda Mendiola, Andrew Fenton, Debra Pratt, Mary Murray, Stephanie Valente, Zahraa Al-Hilli, Julie E Lang
{"title":"Axillary Surgical Management in Breast Cancer Patients after Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Michael Stanczyk, Ayat ElSherif, Tiffany Cheung, Alicia Fanning, Amanda Mendiola, Andrew Fenton, Debra Pratt, Mary Murray, Stephanie Valente, Zahraa Al-Hilli, Julie E Lang","doi":"10.1159/000546267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) patients is an evolving practice for breast cancer surgeons. Our study sought to determine if controversial areas in the treatment of post-NST breast cancer patients had consensus among our panel of breast cancer surgeons at a single institution. Our group updated our care path for the surgical management of breast cancer in November 2022. We aimed to see the influence of the care path update on reaching consensus for the management of the axilla post-NST.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed two rounds of a modified eDelphi in 2021 and 2024 with a panel of 13 and 8 breast cancer surgeons, respectively, to evaluate a shift in expert opinion regarding axillary management in that period. Concordant responses were defined as greater than 75%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The panel reached consensus on sentinel lymph node biopsy for initially clinically node-negative patients, management of extracapsular extension, similar treatment of post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients and post-neoadjuvant endocrine therapy patients, and the value of dual tracer, MRI, and SAVI Scout. There was lack of consensus among the panel on management of micrometastases, management of isolated tumor cells, management of initially node-positive patients that downgraded to node-negative, use of lymphovenous bypass, and use of axillary radiation in post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients. Consensus was reached in 45% of questions in 2021 and 47% in 2023.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite having an institutional care path, our expert panel reached consensus regarding contemporary issues in breast surgery less than 50% of the time. Our study advocates for further research in the management of topics that did not reach consensus.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12201954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546267","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in post-neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) patients is an evolving practice for breast cancer surgeons. Our study sought to determine if controversial areas in the treatment of post-NST breast cancer patients had consensus among our panel of breast cancer surgeons at a single institution. Our group updated our care path for the surgical management of breast cancer in November 2022. We aimed to see the influence of the care path update on reaching consensus for the management of the axilla post-NST.

Methods: We performed two rounds of a modified eDelphi in 2021 and 2024 with a panel of 13 and 8 breast cancer surgeons, respectively, to evaluate a shift in expert opinion regarding axillary management in that period. Concordant responses were defined as greater than 75%.

Results: The panel reached consensus on sentinel lymph node biopsy for initially clinically node-negative patients, management of extracapsular extension, similar treatment of post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients and post-neoadjuvant endocrine therapy patients, and the value of dual tracer, MRI, and SAVI Scout. There was lack of consensus among the panel on management of micrometastases, management of isolated tumor cells, management of initially node-positive patients that downgraded to node-negative, use of lymphovenous bypass, and use of axillary radiation in post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients. Consensus was reached in 45% of questions in 2021 and 47% in 2023.

Conclusion: Despite having an institutional care path, our expert panel reached consensus regarding contemporary issues in breast surgery less than 50% of the time. Our study advocates for further research in the management of topics that did not reach consensus.

新辅助全身治疗后乳腺癌患者腋窝手术治疗:德尔菲研究。
在新辅助全身治疗后(NST)患者中使用前哨淋巴结活检是乳腺癌外科医生不断发展的实践。我们的研究旨在确定在nst后乳腺癌患者治疗中存在争议的领域是否在同一机构的乳腺癌外科医生小组中达成共识。我们小组于2022年11月更新了乳腺癌手术治疗的护理路径。我们的目的是看到护理路径更新对达成共识的管理腋窝后nst的影响。方法:我们分别在2021年和2024年对13名和8名乳腺癌外科医生进行了两轮改进的eDelphi,以评估专家意见在这一时期对腋窝治疗的转变。一致性应答定义为大于75%。结果:专家组就早期临床淋巴结阴性患者的前哨淋巴结活检、囊外扩张的处理、新辅助化疗后患者和新辅助内分泌治疗后患者的类似治疗以及双示踪剂、MRI和SAVI Scout的价值达成共识。对于微转移的处理、分离肿瘤细胞的处理、最初淋巴结阳性转为淋巴结阴性的患者的处理、淋巴静脉旁路的使用以及新辅助化疗后患者腋窝放疗的使用,专家组缺乏共识。在2021年和2023年分别有45%和47%的问题达成了共识。结论:尽管有一个机构护理路径,我们的专家小组就乳房手术的当代问题达成共识的时间不到50%。我们的研究主张对尚未达成共识的课题的管理进行进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信