Implementation and validation of a fast Monte Carlo code as a secondary dose calculation engine for proton therapy with narrow beams.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Vadim P Moskvin, Austin Faught, Fakhriddin Pirlepesov, Fang Xie, Shahad Al-Ward, Marie Cohilis, Kevin Souris, Thomas E Merchant, Chia-Ho Hua
{"title":"Implementation and validation of a fast Monte Carlo code as a secondary dose calculation engine for proton therapy with narrow beams.","authors":"Vadim P Moskvin, Austin Faught, Fakhriddin Pirlepesov, Fang Xie, Shahad Al-Ward, Marie Cohilis, Kevin Souris, Thomas E Merchant, Chia-Ho Hua","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ade9c8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents the implementation and validation of the fast, simplified open-source MC code MCsquare as a secondary dose calculation engine for intensity-modulated proton therapy with narrow beams (the Gaussian-shaped beam spot with standard deviations as small as 1-2 mm) produced by a synchrotron-based system with minibeam modification. A proton therapy system was modeled with MCsquare, using commissioning data, and with TOPAS, an explicit multi-particle MC code. The computed dose distributions were compared with the patient-specific quality assurance (QA) measurements (203 measurements for 94 treatment fields), using gamma analysis with criteria of 3% and 3 mm. The dose distributions in the patient geometry defined by computed tomography (CT) images were simulated with MCsquare and TOPAS and compared. For the main beam, the gamma passing rates of the patient-specific QA averaged 99.4% and 97.9% for MCsquare and 99.2% and 98.5% for TOPAS, with and without range shifter use, respectively. For minibeams, the rate was 100% for both MC codes. The dose distributions calculated with TOPAS and MCsquare on the patient's CT were identical, within the statistical error of the simulation. The simulation time with MCsquare varied between 1 and 25 min per plan on a 16-core workstation with a 2% statistical error. The fast, simplified MCsquare and the slower TOPAS using explicit multi-particle transport produced statistically identical dose distributions. The results support using MCsquare as a secondary dose engine for narrow beams.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ade9c8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents the implementation and validation of the fast, simplified open-source MC code MCsquare as a secondary dose calculation engine for intensity-modulated proton therapy with narrow beams (the Gaussian-shaped beam spot with standard deviations as small as 1-2 mm) produced by a synchrotron-based system with minibeam modification. A proton therapy system was modeled with MCsquare, using commissioning data, and with TOPAS, an explicit multi-particle MC code. The computed dose distributions were compared with the patient-specific quality assurance (QA) measurements (203 measurements for 94 treatment fields), using gamma analysis with criteria of 3% and 3 mm. The dose distributions in the patient geometry defined by computed tomography (CT) images were simulated with MCsquare and TOPAS and compared. For the main beam, the gamma passing rates of the patient-specific QA averaged 99.4% and 97.9% for MCsquare and 99.2% and 98.5% for TOPAS, with and without range shifter use, respectively. For minibeams, the rate was 100% for both MC codes. The dose distributions calculated with TOPAS and MCsquare on the patient's CT were identical, within the statistical error of the simulation. The simulation time with MCsquare varied between 1 and 25 min per plan on a 16-core workstation with a 2% statistical error. The fast, simplified MCsquare and the slower TOPAS using explicit multi-particle transport produced statistically identical dose distributions. The results support using MCsquare as a secondary dose engine for narrow beams.

窄束质子治疗二次剂量计算引擎快速蒙特卡罗代码的实现与验证。
本研究介绍了快速、简化的开源MC代码MCsquare的实现和验证,将其作为窄光束(标准差小至1-2毫米的高斯形光束斑)的强度调制质子治疗的二次剂量计算引擎,该治疗由基于同步加速器的系统与微光束修改产生。利用调试数据和明确的多粒子MC代码TOPAS,利用MCsquare对质子治疗系统进行了建模。计算的剂量分布与患者特异性质量保证(QA)测量值(94个治疗场的203个测量值)进行比较,使用标准为3%和3mm的伽马分析。用MCsquare和TOPAS模拟计算机断层扫描(CT)图像定义的患者几何结构中的剂量分布并进行比较。对于主波束,使用和不使用范围移位器时,MCsquare和TOPAS的患者特异性QA的伽马通过率分别为99.4%和97.9%和99.2%和98.5%。对于微型波束,两个MC码的速率都是100%。TOPAS和MCsquare在患者CT上计算的剂量分布相同,在模拟的统计误差范围内。在16核工作站上,MCsquare的模拟时间在每个计划1到25分钟之间变化,统计误差为2%。快速、简化的MCsquare和使用显式多粒子传输的较慢的TOPAS产生统计上相同的剂量分布。结果支持使用MCsquare作为窄光束的二次剂量引擎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信