Outcomes After Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Lisa Ngo, Chelsea Spector, Monique Motta, Danielle Katz, Shenae Samuels, Carrie Laituri, Tamar Levene
{"title":"Outcomes After Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol for Minimally Invasive Repair of Pectus Excavatum.","authors":"Lisa Ngo, Chelsea Spector, Monique Motta, Danielle Katz, Shenae Samuels, Carrie Laituri, Tamar Levene","doi":"10.1177/00031348251353807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Surgical repair of pectus excavatum is commonly associated with significant post-operative pain requiring prolonged hospital stays and critical care admission for sedative and analgesic infusions. By implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients undergoing minimally invasive pectus repair, we aimed to reduce length of hospital stay, need for higher level monitored care, and opioid utilization. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients under the age of 25 years who underwent Nuss bar insertion at our institution between January 2011 and May 2021. The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, and opioid consumption before and after the implementation of the ERAS protocol in December 2017. <b>Results:</b> A total of 86 patients underwent Nuss repair of pectus excavatum, including 14 patients in the ERAS cohort. Mean length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the ERAS cohort (1.9 vs. 4.9 days, P < 0.001). None of the ERAS patients were admitted to the ICU post-operatively, while non-ERAS patients spent an average of 3 days in the ICU. Use of narcotic patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was nearly halved after ERAS implementation (50.0% vs. 97.2%), and total oxycodone, Percocet, and Dilaudid dosages were significantly reduced. <b>Conclusions:</b> Implementation of an ERAS protocol was associated with significant reductions in overall hospital length of stay, ICU utilization, and inpatient opioid consumption following Nuss repair of pectus excavatum. These changes in post-op management are expected to reduce costs and promote earlier return to school and activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251353807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251353807","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical repair of pectus excavatum is commonly associated with significant post-operative pain requiring prolonged hospital stays and critical care admission for sedative and analgesic infusions. By implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for patients undergoing minimally invasive pectus repair, we aimed to reduce length of hospital stay, need for higher level monitored care, and opioid utilization. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients under the age of 25 years who underwent Nuss bar insertion at our institution between January 2011 and May 2021. The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) utilization, and opioid consumption before and after the implementation of the ERAS protocol in December 2017. Results: A total of 86 patients underwent Nuss repair of pectus excavatum, including 14 patients in the ERAS cohort. Mean length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the ERAS cohort (1.9 vs. 4.9 days, P < 0.001). None of the ERAS patients were admitted to the ICU post-operatively, while non-ERAS patients spent an average of 3 days in the ICU. Use of narcotic patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was nearly halved after ERAS implementation (50.0% vs. 97.2%), and total oxycodone, Percocet, and Dilaudid dosages were significantly reduced. Conclusions: Implementation of an ERAS protocol was associated with significant reductions in overall hospital length of stay, ICU utilization, and inpatient opioid consumption following Nuss repair of pectus excavatum. These changes in post-op management are expected to reduce costs and promote earlier return to school and activities.

微创修复漏斗胸的增强恢复方案实施后的结果。
背景:漏斗胸的手术修复通常伴随着明显的术后疼痛,需要长时间的住院治疗和镇静镇痛输注的重症监护。通过对微创胸肌修复患者实施手术后增强恢复(ERAS)方案,我们旨在减少住院时间,需要更高水平的监测护理,以及阿片类药物的使用。方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2021年5月期间在我院接受Nuss棒插入的所有25岁以下患者的病历。主要结局是2017年12月ERAS方案实施前后的住院时间、重症监护病房(ICU)使用率和阿片类药物消费量。结果:86例患者行漏斗胸Nuss修复术,其中ERAS组14例。ERAS组的平均住院时间显著缩短(1.9天对4.9天,P < 0.001)。ERAS患者术后无一例入住ICU,而非ERAS患者术后平均住院时间为3天。ERAS实施后,麻醉性患者自控镇痛(PCA)的使用几乎减少了一半(50.0%对97.2%),羟考酮、Percocet和双劳地酮的总剂量也显著减少。结论:在漏斗胸Nuss修复术后,ERAS方案的实施与总住院时间、ICU使用率和住院阿片类药物消耗的显著减少有关。术后管理方面的这些变化预计将降低费用,促进尽早返回学校和参加活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信