Development of an Acute Femoral Hernia Treatment Algorithm: Insights From the ACHQC National Database.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ian Kim, Galinos Barmparas, Shirin Towfigh
{"title":"Development of an Acute Femoral Hernia Treatment Algorithm: Insights From the ACHQC National Database.","authors":"Ian Kim, Galinos Barmparas, Shirin Towfigh","doi":"10.1177/00031348251353074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundDue to the rarity of femoral hernias (FH), mastery of surgical decision-making can be challenging. Current guidelines address only elective treatment of FH, without guidance for the acute setting.ObjectiveTo review current surgical management of FH, and to determine a modern-day treatment algorithm for FH in the acute setting.MethodsThe Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) was surveyed for adult patients undergoing elective (EFH) or acute (AFH) FH repair from 2016 to 2023.ResultsOf 2563 FH repairs, 61 (2.4%) were AFH. Patients with AFH were more likely to be female (68.9% vs 31.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), older (median age 76 vs 64.5 years, <i>P</i> < 0.01), have greater comorbidity (ASA III or higher, 58% vs 30%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and larger hernia defects (≥1.5 cm, 51% vs 34%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Open surgery was the predominant approach for AFH (61% vs 14%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), while EFH was mostly repaired robotically (54% vs 10%, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Over time, robotic surgery increased for both AFH and EFH. AFH were less likely to have mesh implanted (72% vs 97%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), though permanent synthetic mesh remained the dominant choice in both groups (89% vs 98%, <i>P</i> < 0.01).DiscussionOpen surgery with mesh dominates for AFH, but robotic techniques are increasingly utilized. A treatment algorithm is proposed to optimize management of patients with AFH to determine the safest approach based on clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"31348251353074"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251353074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundDue to the rarity of femoral hernias (FH), mastery of surgical decision-making can be challenging. Current guidelines address only elective treatment of FH, without guidance for the acute setting.ObjectiveTo review current surgical management of FH, and to determine a modern-day treatment algorithm for FH in the acute setting.MethodsThe Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) was surveyed for adult patients undergoing elective (EFH) or acute (AFH) FH repair from 2016 to 2023.ResultsOf 2563 FH repairs, 61 (2.4%) were AFH. Patients with AFH were more likely to be female (68.9% vs 31.1%, P < 0.01), older (median age 76 vs 64.5 years, P < 0.01), have greater comorbidity (ASA III or higher, 58% vs 30%, P < 0.01), and larger hernia defects (≥1.5 cm, 51% vs 34%, P < 0.01). Open surgery was the predominant approach for AFH (61% vs 14%, P < 0.01), while EFH was mostly repaired robotically (54% vs 10%, P < 0.01). Over time, robotic surgery increased for both AFH and EFH. AFH were less likely to have mesh implanted (72% vs 97%, P < 0.01), though permanent synthetic mesh remained the dominant choice in both groups (89% vs 98%, P < 0.01).DiscussionOpen surgery with mesh dominates for AFH, but robotic techniques are increasingly utilized. A treatment algorithm is proposed to optimize management of patients with AFH to determine the safest approach based on clinical scenarios.

急性股疝治疗算法的发展:来自ACHQC国家数据库的见解。
背景:由于股疝(FH)的罕见性,掌握手术决策是具有挑战性的。目前的指南只针对FH的选择性治疗,没有针对急性情况的指导。目的回顾FH的外科治疗现状,探讨FH急性期的现代治疗方法。方法对2016 - 2023年接受选择性(EFH)或急性(AFH) FH修复的成人患者进行腹部核心健康质量协作(ACHQC)调查。结果2563例FH修复中,61例为AFH,占2.4%。AFH患者多为女性(68.9% vs 31.1%, P < 0.01)、年龄较大(中位年龄76 vs 64.5岁,P < 0.01)、合病较多(ASAⅲ级及以上,58% vs 30%, P < 0.01)、疝缺损较大(≥1.5 cm, 51% vs 34%, P < 0.01)。开放手术是治疗AFH的主要方法(61%比14%,P < 0.01),而EFH主要采用机器人修复(54%比10%,P < 0.01)。随着时间的推移,机器人手术对AFH和EFH的治疗都有所增加。AFH不太可能植入补片(72%对97%,P < 0.01),尽管永久性合成补片仍然是两组的主要选择(89%对98%,P < 0.01)。开放式手术与网状物在AFH中占主导地位,但机器人技术越来越多地使用。提出了一种优化AFH患者管理的治疗算法,根据临床情况确定最安全的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信