Who can work when, and why do we have to care? Education, care demands, and the gendered division of work schedules in France and Germany

IF 3.4 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Carolin Deuflhard, Jeanne Ganault
{"title":"Who can work when, and why do we have to care? Education, care demands, and the gendered division of work schedules in France and Germany","authors":"Carolin Deuflhard,&nbsp;Jeanne Ganault","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This article investigates how education and the presence and age of children shape gendered work schedule arrangements among couples in France and Germany.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the prevalence of nonstandard work schedules, schools and daycare facilities typically operate during standard work hours. Nevertheless, little is known on the gendered division of work schedules. Both France and Germany have shifted toward labor market deregulation, favoring the concentration of nonstandard schedules in lower-class jobs. However, France provides full-day public education and care. In Germany, public childcare is less comprehensive, and daycare and school hours are considerably shorter.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>The study uses sequence and cluster analysis on time-use data (<i>N</i> = 11,268 days) to identify typical work schedules. Multinomial logistic regressions assess how education and the presence and age of children are associated with men's and women's types of days.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In both countries, less-educated men were more likely to work shifts, whereas less-educated women were more likely to not be employed. However, standard work schedules prevailed among better-educated French men <i>and</i> women, whereas partial workdays and non-workdays predominated among German women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In both labor market contexts, less-educated partnered women rather than men seem to opt out of employment due to scheduling conflicts between work and care. However, more work-facilitating family policies allow for more gender-equal schedules among better-educated men and women in France.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 4","pages":"1618-1638"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13085","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This article investigates how education and the presence and age of children shape gendered work schedule arrangements among couples in France and Germany.

Background

Despite the prevalence of nonstandard work schedules, schools and daycare facilities typically operate during standard work hours. Nevertheless, little is known on the gendered division of work schedules. Both France and Germany have shifted toward labor market deregulation, favoring the concentration of nonstandard schedules in lower-class jobs. However, France provides full-day public education and care. In Germany, public childcare is less comprehensive, and daycare and school hours are considerably shorter.

Method

The study uses sequence and cluster analysis on time-use data (N = 11,268 days) to identify typical work schedules. Multinomial logistic regressions assess how education and the presence and age of children are associated with men's and women's types of days.

Results

In both countries, less-educated men were more likely to work shifts, whereas less-educated women were more likely to not be employed. However, standard work schedules prevailed among better-educated French men and women, whereas partial workdays and non-workdays predominated among German women.

Conclusion

In both labor market contexts, less-educated partnered women rather than men seem to opt out of employment due to scheduling conflicts between work and care. However, more work-facilitating family policies allow for more gender-equal schedules among better-educated men and women in France.

Abstract Image

谁能在什么时候工作,我们为什么要关心这些?法国和德国的教育、护理需求和工作时间表的性别分工
目的调查法国和德国夫妇的教育程度、子女的存在和年龄对两性工作时间安排的影响。尽管非标准工作时间表普遍存在,但学校和日托设施通常在标准工作时间内运作。然而,人们对工作时间表的性别分工知之甚少。法国和德国都已转向放松劳动力市场管制,倾向于将非标准时间表集中在下层工作岗位上。然而,法国提供全天的公共教育和看护。在德国,公共托儿服务不那么全面,日托和上学时间也短得多。方法采用序列分析和聚类分析方法对11,268天的时间使用数据进行分析,确定典型的工作时间表。多项逻辑回归评估了教育程度、孩子的存在和年龄与男性和女性的生活类型之间的关系。结果在这两个国家,受教育程度较低的男性更有可能轮班工作,而受教育程度较低的女性更有可能没有工作。但是,标准的工作时间表在受过良好教育的法国男女中占主导地位,而在德国妇女中占主导地位的是部分工作日和非工作日。在这两种劳动力市场背景下,受教育程度较低的有伴侣的女性,而不是男性,似乎会因为工作和照顾之间的时间安排冲突而选择退出就业。然而,在法国,更多的促进工作的家庭政策使得受过良好教育的男性和女性的时间表更加性别平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信