Same-sex marriage legislation and implementation: Marital intention and barriers for marriage actualization among same-sex couples in Asia

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Eliz Miu Yin Wong
{"title":"Same-sex marriage legislation and implementation: Marital intention and barriers for marriage actualization among same-sex couples in Asia","authors":"Eliz Miu Yin Wong","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This paper explores the power and limits of same-sex marriage legislation by examining the rationales behind same-sex couples' marital intentions and barriers to actualization in Asian societies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Marriage equality is seen as a milestone for lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and plus (LGBQ+) rights. However, beyond its symbolic importance, how does this policy affect LGBQ+ people's lives?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed-method comparative study, with 647 survey responses and 70 interviews, was conducted with LGBQ+ people in committed same-sex relationships who live in Taipei (the first in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage) and Hong Kong (without the policy).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Legal protection is one of the pivotal reasons behind same-sex couples' marital intentions. However, the policy implementation might jeopardize their privacy and expose them to discrimination. The increase in visibility associated with Taiwan's documentation systems and public debates make LGBQ+ people feel as though they were “living under the spotlight,” invoking unwanted and unfriendly attention from strangers and co-workers. Paradoxically, despite the lack of legal protection, LGBQ+ people in Hong Kong could “live in the shadows” to avoid negative consequences amidst unfriendly environments.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Same-sex marriage legalization can be a double-edged sword; it provides legal protection while bringing challenges for same-sex couples. This study contributes to the literature on LGBQ+ rights after marriage equality and sexual citizenship beyond the Global North.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>Documentation systems in Taiwan that reveal one's marital status and sexual orientation demonstrate the need for privacy considerations and address the unique situation of LGBQ+ people when implementing same-sex marriage.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 4","pages":"1407-1432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This paper explores the power and limits of same-sex marriage legislation by examining the rationales behind same-sex couples' marital intentions and barriers to actualization in Asian societies.

Background

Marriage equality is seen as a milestone for lesbian, gay, bisexual, queer, and plus (LGBQ+) rights. However, beyond its symbolic importance, how does this policy affect LGBQ+ people's lives?

Method

A mixed-method comparative study, with 647 survey responses and 70 interviews, was conducted with LGBQ+ people in committed same-sex relationships who live in Taipei (the first in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage) and Hong Kong (without the policy).

Results

Legal protection is one of the pivotal reasons behind same-sex couples' marital intentions. However, the policy implementation might jeopardize their privacy and expose them to discrimination. The increase in visibility associated with Taiwan's documentation systems and public debates make LGBQ+ people feel as though they were “living under the spotlight,” invoking unwanted and unfriendly attention from strangers and co-workers. Paradoxically, despite the lack of legal protection, LGBQ+ people in Hong Kong could “live in the shadows” to avoid negative consequences amidst unfriendly environments.

Conclusion

Same-sex marriage legalization can be a double-edged sword; it provides legal protection while bringing challenges for same-sex couples. This study contributes to the literature on LGBQ+ rights after marriage equality and sexual citizenship beyond the Global North.

Implications

Documentation systems in Taiwan that reveal one's marital status and sexual orientation demonstrate the need for privacy considerations and address the unique situation of LGBQ+ people when implementing same-sex marriage.

同性婚姻立法与实施:亚洲同性伴侣的婚姻意向与婚姻实现的障碍
目的探讨同性婚姻立法的权力和限制,考察亚洲社会中同性伴侣婚姻意向背后的基本原理和实现的障碍。婚姻平等被视为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、酷儿和同性恋者(LGBQ+)权利的里程碑。然而,除了它的象征意义之外,这项政策是如何影响LGBQ+人群的生活的?方法采用混合方法比较研究,对生活在台北(亚洲第一个同性婚姻合法化城市)和香港(未实行同性婚姻合法化城市)的LGBQ+人群进行647份问卷调查和70次访谈。结果法律保护是同性伴侣婚姻意向背后的关键原因之一。然而,政策的实施可能会危及他们的隐私,使他们受到歧视。与台湾的文件系统和公共辩论相关的曝光率的提高,让LGBQ+人群觉得他们好像“生活在聚光灯下”,引发了陌生人和同事不必要和不友好的关注。矛盾的是,尽管缺乏法律保护,香港的LGBQ+人群可以“生活在阴影中”,以避免在不友好的环境中产生负面影响。结论同性婚姻合法化是一把双刃剑;它为同性伴侣提供了法律保护,同时也带来了挑战。本研究对全球北方以外的LGBQ+在婚姻平等和性公民之后的权利研究有一定的贡献。台湾的婚姻状况和性取向文件制度体现了对隐私考虑的需要,并解决了LGBQ+人群在实施同性婚姻时的独特处境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信