A qualitative investigation of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome genetics triage

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Kaycee Carbone, Ann Seman, Catherine Clinton, Renée Pelletier
{"title":"A qualitative investigation of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome genetics triage","authors":"Kaycee Carbone,&nbsp;Ann Seman,&nbsp;Catherine Clinton,&nbsp;Renée Pelletier","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a group of hereditary connective tissue disorders for which patients struggle to find a timely and accurate diagnosis. Overburdened genetics practices have been identified as a barrier to care. Triage is a tool utilized by genetics practices to address workload issues and prioritize high-risk patients. Through a demographic survey and semi-structured interviews, this study aimed to explore what triages exist for EDS referrals to genetics practices across the United States and how genetic counselors perceive their triages. Inductive coding and conventional content analysis were used to analyze fifteen interview transcripts and identify categories. Six categories emerged from the analysis: EDS referrals &amp; genetics appointment eligibility criteria; triage development, processes &amp; tools; factors influencing triage; triage goals and impact on the clinic; triage impact on patient care; and future goals &amp; changes desired. Many participants noted a general increase in EDS awareness and referrals. This study identified that clinics employ unique triage processes including specific referral requirements and triage tools such as decline letters and patient questionnaires. Factors noted to influence triage included the clinic's threshold to see patients, perceived scope of practice for genetics providers, lack of other appropriate practices nearby, and limited clinic resources. Participants identified several benefits of their triage and felt that it was meeting their clinic's goals. However, several disadvantages were noted including a discrepancy in care for patients who were accepted for evaluation and those who were declined (e.g., hypermobile EDS [hEDS]). Several participants reported feelings of guilt with declining hEDS patients as they often lack good diagnosis and management options and that systemic change must occur to improve care for the hEDS population. This study identified that the goals, composition, and factors affecting EDS genetics triages across the United States vary. While many positive aspects of EDS triage exist, there is a need for genetic counselors and their practices to explore ways to improve care for all EDS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a group of hereditary connective tissue disorders for which patients struggle to find a timely and accurate diagnosis. Overburdened genetics practices have been identified as a barrier to care. Triage is a tool utilized by genetics practices to address workload issues and prioritize high-risk patients. Through a demographic survey and semi-structured interviews, this study aimed to explore what triages exist for EDS referrals to genetics practices across the United States and how genetic counselors perceive their triages. Inductive coding and conventional content analysis were used to analyze fifteen interview transcripts and identify categories. Six categories emerged from the analysis: EDS referrals & genetics appointment eligibility criteria; triage development, processes & tools; factors influencing triage; triage goals and impact on the clinic; triage impact on patient care; and future goals & changes desired. Many participants noted a general increase in EDS awareness and referrals. This study identified that clinics employ unique triage processes including specific referral requirements and triage tools such as decline letters and patient questionnaires. Factors noted to influence triage included the clinic's threshold to see patients, perceived scope of practice for genetics providers, lack of other appropriate practices nearby, and limited clinic resources. Participants identified several benefits of their triage and felt that it was meeting their clinic's goals. However, several disadvantages were noted including a discrepancy in care for patients who were accepted for evaluation and those who were declined (e.g., hypermobile EDS [hEDS]). Several participants reported feelings of guilt with declining hEDS patients as they often lack good diagnosis and management options and that systemic change must occur to improve care for the hEDS population. This study identified that the goals, composition, and factors affecting EDS genetics triages across the United States vary. While many positive aspects of EDS triage exist, there is a need for genetic counselors and their practices to explore ways to improve care for all EDS patients.

埃勒-丹洛斯综合征遗传学分诊的定性研究
ehers - danlos综合征(EDS)是一组遗传性结缔组织疾病,患者很难找到及时准确的诊断。负担过重的遗传学实践已被确定为护理的障碍。分诊是遗传学实践中用来解决工作量问题和优先考虑高危患者的工具。通过人口统计调查和半结构化访谈,本研究旨在探讨美国EDS转诊的遗传实践中存在哪些分类,以及遗传咨询师如何看待他们的分类。采用归纳编码和常规内容分析对15份访谈笔录进行分析,并进行分类。分析得出六个类别:EDS转介;遗传学预约资格标准;分诊发展、流程&;工具;影响分诊的因素;分诊目标及其对临床的影响;分诊对病人护理的影响;以及未来的目标& &;期望的变化。许多与会者指出,对EDS的认识和转诊情况普遍有所提高。本研究确定诊所采用独特的分诊流程,包括特定的转诊要求和分诊工具,如拒绝信件和患者问卷。影响分诊的因素包括诊所的就诊门槛、遗传学提供者的执业范围、附近缺乏其他合适的执业以及有限的诊所资源。参与者确定了他们分诊的几个好处,并认为这符合他们诊所的目标。然而,也注意到一些缺点,包括对接受评估的患者和拒绝接受评估的患者的护理差异(例如,超移动EDS [hEDS])。一些参与者报告说,对病情下降的hEDS患者感到内疚,因为他们往往缺乏良好的诊断和管理选择,必须进行系统性的改变,以改善对hEDS人群的护理。本研究发现,影响美国EDS基因分类的目标、组成和因素各不相同。虽然EDS分诊有许多积极的方面存在,但仍需要遗传咨询师和他们的实践来探索改善所有EDS患者护理的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信