Latent profiles of Koreans' attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Jaerim Lee, Jane Park, Seohee Son
{"title":"Latent profiles of Koreans' attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation","authors":"Jaerim Lee,&nbsp;Jane Park,&nbsp;Seohee Son","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Despite conceptual differences between alternatives <i>to</i> traditional marital formation and alternatives <i>within</i> traditional marriage, exclusive empirical attention to the former has been restricted. We aimed to identify the latent profiles of attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation among South Koreans, including voluntary singlehood, same-sex marriage (SSM), nonmarital sex, nonmarital births, cohabitation, and domestic partnership and to examine the demographic factors that predict profile membership.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Traditionally, getting married was a required life event in Korea that must occur within a different-sex partner relationship prior to intercourse, childbirth, and living together. However, alternative partnerships and non-partnerships have become visible due to attitude changes. In this context, attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation may vary among Koreans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted latent profile analysis using a sample of 1584 Koreans aged 20–64 years from the 2023 Seoul Family Survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified four profiles: centrists who oppose SSM (38.0%), conservatives (27.3%), centrists across all alternatives (20.9%), and progressives (13.8%). Centrists who oppose SSM were relatively positive toward voluntary singlehood, nonmarital sex, and cohabitation; neutral toward nonmarital births and domestic partnerships; and negative toward SSM. Conservatives had relatively traditional attitudes with notable opposition to SSM. Centrists across all alternatives were neutral toward all the alternatives including SSM. Finally, progressives were the most positive toward all alternatives with the lowest score for nonmarital births. Gender, age, marital status, education, and having a religion predicted profile membership.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings show variation in attitudes toward partnerships beyond traditional marriage in an East Asian context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 4","pages":"1387-1406"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Despite conceptual differences between alternatives to traditional marital formation and alternatives within traditional marriage, exclusive empirical attention to the former has been restricted. We aimed to identify the latent profiles of attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation among South Koreans, including voluntary singlehood, same-sex marriage (SSM), nonmarital sex, nonmarital births, cohabitation, and domestic partnership and to examine the demographic factors that predict profile membership.

Background

Traditionally, getting married was a required life event in Korea that must occur within a different-sex partner relationship prior to intercourse, childbirth, and living together. However, alternative partnerships and non-partnerships have become visible due to attitude changes. In this context, attitudes toward alternatives to traditional marital formation may vary among Koreans.

Method

We conducted latent profile analysis using a sample of 1584 Koreans aged 20–64 years from the 2023 Seoul Family Survey.

Results

We identified four profiles: centrists who oppose SSM (38.0%), conservatives (27.3%), centrists across all alternatives (20.9%), and progressives (13.8%). Centrists who oppose SSM were relatively positive toward voluntary singlehood, nonmarital sex, and cohabitation; neutral toward nonmarital births and domestic partnerships; and negative toward SSM. Conservatives had relatively traditional attitudes with notable opposition to SSM. Centrists across all alternatives were neutral toward all the alternatives including SSM. Finally, progressives were the most positive toward all alternatives with the lowest score for nonmarital births. Gender, age, marital status, education, and having a religion predicted profile membership.

Conclusion

The findings show variation in attitudes toward partnerships beyond traditional marriage in an East Asian context.

Abstract Image

韩国人对替代传统婚姻形式的态度的潜在特征
尽管传统婚姻形成的替代方案和传统婚姻中的替代方案在概念上存在差异,但对前者的专门经验关注受到限制。我们的目的是确定韩国人对传统婚姻形式的替代态度的潜在概况,包括自愿单身、同性婚姻(SSM)、非婚性行为、非婚生育、同居和家庭伙伴关系,并检查预测概况成员的人口统计学因素。传统上,在韩国,结婚是必须发生的生活事件,必须在性交、生育和同居之前在不同性别的伴侣关系中发生。然而,由于态度的改变,其他合作伙伴和非合作伙伴关系已经可见。在这种情况下,韩国人对替代传统婚姻形式的态度可能会有所不同。方法对2023年首尔家庭调查中1584名年龄在20-64岁的韩国人进行潜在剖面分析。结果我们确定了四种情况:反对SSM的中间派(38.0%),保守派(27.3%),所有替代方案的中间派(20.9%)和进步派(13.8%)。反对SSM的中间派对自愿单身、非婚性行为和同居持相对积极的态度;对非婚生育和同居关系持中立态度;对SSM是消极的。保守派持相对传统的态度,明显反对SSM。所有替代方案中的中间派对包括SSM在内的所有替代方案均持中立态度。最后,进步派对所有选择最积极,非婚生育得分最低。性别、年龄、婚姻状况、教育程度和是否有宗教信仰都可以预测档案成员的身份。研究结果表明,东亚人对传统婚姻之外的伙伴关系的态度存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信