Adeid Rodrigues Santos Silva , Marcos Reis Rosa , Rodrigo Nogueira de Vasconcelos
{"title":"Evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas in preserving ecosystem processes via remote Sensing: A review","authors":"Adeid Rodrigues Santos Silva , Marcos Reis Rosa , Rodrigo Nogueira de Vasconcelos","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2025.127002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in preserving ecosystem processes remains a major scientific challenge. This study reviews the application of remote sensing techniques in assessing PA effectiveness, analyzing publication trends, key contributors, and methodological approaches from 1988 to 2022. A bibliometric and systematic review approach was conducted using the Scopus database, employing co-occurrence network analysis, citation analysis, and statistical assessments. The results indicate a substantial increase in research activity, with 874 publications identified, reflecting an annual growth rate of 14.92%. China (27.1% of publications), the U.S. (26.5%), and the U.K. (9.15%) lead global contributions. Remote sensing, mainly using Landsat (60% of studies), MODIS, and Sentinel imagery, has been instrumental in evaluating deforestation, land-use change, and ecosystem integrity within PAs. The most analyzed PA types were national parks, reserves, and forests, with significant threats including deforestation, fires, and land-use conversion. Despite research expansion, uncertainties persist regarding PA effectiveness, with many areas failing to prevent biodiversity loss due to external pressures. The study highlights that while remote sensing has significantly advanced PA monitoring, it is often limited by a lack of integration with socio-economic and ecological dimensions. Future research should focus on interdisciplinary approaches, incorporating high-resolution remote sensing data and adaptive management strategies to enhance conservation outcomes. Strengthening international collaboration and refining methodologies will improve protected areas’ long-term resilience and effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"87 ","pages":"Article 127002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138125001797","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluating the effectiveness of protected areas (PAs) in preserving ecosystem processes remains a major scientific challenge. This study reviews the application of remote sensing techniques in assessing PA effectiveness, analyzing publication trends, key contributors, and methodological approaches from 1988 to 2022. A bibliometric and systematic review approach was conducted using the Scopus database, employing co-occurrence network analysis, citation analysis, and statistical assessments. The results indicate a substantial increase in research activity, with 874 publications identified, reflecting an annual growth rate of 14.92%. China (27.1% of publications), the U.S. (26.5%), and the U.K. (9.15%) lead global contributions. Remote sensing, mainly using Landsat (60% of studies), MODIS, and Sentinel imagery, has been instrumental in evaluating deforestation, land-use change, and ecosystem integrity within PAs. The most analyzed PA types were national parks, reserves, and forests, with significant threats including deforestation, fires, and land-use conversion. Despite research expansion, uncertainties persist regarding PA effectiveness, with many areas failing to prevent biodiversity loss due to external pressures. The study highlights that while remote sensing has significantly advanced PA monitoring, it is often limited by a lack of integration with socio-economic and ecological dimensions. Future research should focus on interdisciplinary approaches, incorporating high-resolution remote sensing data and adaptive management strategies to enhance conservation outcomes. Strengthening international collaboration and refining methodologies will improve protected areas’ long-term resilience and effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation.
Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.