Improving employee self-rated creativity using paradoxical strengths regulation: A mediated path analysis among personality traits, paradox mindset, and employee self-rated creativity

Florencio Kabigting (Jun) Jr, Stewart Donaldson, Jeanne Nakamura
{"title":"Improving employee self-rated creativity using paradoxical strengths regulation: A mediated path analysis among personality traits, paradox mindset, and employee self-rated creativity","authors":"Florencio Kabigting (Jun) Jr,&nbsp;Stewart Donaldson,&nbsp;Jeanne Nakamura","doi":"10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To remain competitive in today's globalized and fast-paced world, organizations depend on employees' creativity. In this article, I present a novel concept of Paradoxical Strengths Regulation (PSR), which proposes that combining seemingly contradictory strengths can enhance creativity. PSR utilizes the paradoxical personality traits of <em>Openness to Experience (Openness)</em> and <em>Conscientiousness</em>, examining their relationship to creativity, particularly <em>Employee Self-rated Creativity (ESC)</em>, through a paradox mindset. A sample of 189 US-based working adult participants was used in a cross-sectional survey design, employing various statistical analyses to test hypotheses related to the PSR framework. The findings supported the hypothesis that a paradox mindset mediates the relationship between <em>Openness</em> and <em>ESC.</em> Moreover, the investigation revealed that, on its own, <em>Openness</em> strongly correlated with <em>ESC</em>, but this was not the case for <em>Conscientiousness</em>. Furthermore, the traits showed no significant relationship, indicating that they do not necessarily need to be combined to enhance creativity. Instead, leveraging one's <em>Openness</em> trait and adopting a paradox mindset appears more beneficial. However, the efficacy of the PSR framework could not conclusively be determined at this stage, suggesting that future research could explore facet (sub-trait)-level analysis for further understanding. The research’s implications, applications, strengths, and limitations are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creativity","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374525000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To remain competitive in today's globalized and fast-paced world, organizations depend on employees' creativity. In this article, I present a novel concept of Paradoxical Strengths Regulation (PSR), which proposes that combining seemingly contradictory strengths can enhance creativity. PSR utilizes the paradoxical personality traits of Openness to Experience (Openness) and Conscientiousness, examining their relationship to creativity, particularly Employee Self-rated Creativity (ESC), through a paradox mindset. A sample of 189 US-based working adult participants was used in a cross-sectional survey design, employing various statistical analyses to test hypotheses related to the PSR framework. The findings supported the hypothesis that a paradox mindset mediates the relationship between Openness and ESC. Moreover, the investigation revealed that, on its own, Openness strongly correlated with ESC, but this was not the case for Conscientiousness. Furthermore, the traits showed no significant relationship, indicating that they do not necessarily need to be combined to enhance creativity. Instead, leveraging one's Openness trait and adopting a paradox mindset appears more beneficial. However, the efficacy of the PSR framework could not conclusively be determined at this stage, suggesting that future research could explore facet (sub-trait)-level analysis for further understanding. The research’s implications, applications, strengths, and limitations are also discussed.
运用矛盾优势调节提高员工自评创造力:人格特质、矛盾心态与员工自评创造力的中介路径分析
为了在当今全球化和快节奏的世界中保持竞争力,组织依赖于员工的创造力。在这篇文章中,我提出了一个新的概念,即矛盾优势调节(paradox Strengths Regulation, PSR),它提出将看似矛盾的优势结合起来可以提高创造力。PSR利用矛盾的人格特征开放性(开放性)和尽责性,通过悖论思维来研究它们与创造力,特别是员工自评创造力(ESC)的关系。189名在美国工作的成年人参与了一项横断面调查设计,采用各种统计分析来检验与PSR框架相关的假设。研究结果支持了悖论心态在开放性和ESC之间起中介作用的假设。此外,调查显示,就其本身而言,开放性与ESC密切相关,但尽责性并非如此。此外,这些特征没有显示出显著的关系,这表明它们不一定需要结合起来提高创造力。相反,利用一个人的开放特质和采用悖论心态似乎更有益。然而,目前尚不能确定PSR框架的有效性,建议未来的研究可以探索面(子特质)水平的分析以进一步了解。本文还讨论了本研究的意义、应用、优势和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信