Hybridised public management: Introduction to the special issue

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Jan-Erik Johanson, Jarmo Vakkuri, David Mills, Adina Dudau
{"title":"Hybridised public management: Introduction to the special issue","authors":"Jan-Erik Johanson,&nbsp;Jarmo Vakkuri,&nbsp;David Mills,&nbsp;Adina Dudau","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Our analysis of the literature indicates a growing prominence of hybridity within the field of public administration. Hybrid arrangements incorporate ambiguities and controversies, but they also represent opportunities for joint action and goal achievement. The difficulties inherent in hybridity originate from the dichotomous view of the public–private divide and the underdeveloped measurement instruments. The contributions of this special issue address these challenges, providing extensive evidence as to the empirical reality of the manifold aspects of hybrid public management. Encouragingly, this knowledge enabled us to revisit existing hybridity models and provide an up-to-date Framework for Hybridised Public Management to further advance the development of theory and practice. Drawing on this framework, we suggest future research in key areas.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Public managers in hybrid organisations must adeptly communicate with varied audiences, each with distinct expectations. This requires tailoring messages to demonstrate the organisation's multi-faceted value creation, encompassing public, private, and social benefits, to secure stakeholder buy-in and support.</li>\n \n <li>The integration of divergent goals and logics in hybrid organisations demands innovative organisational designs to manage these incongruences. Hybrid organisational structures and processes should foster cooperation among public, private, and civil society actors.</li>\n \n <li>Traditional financial metrics often inadequately capture the complexity and societal value of hybrid arrangements. Practitioners should adopt and develop performance measurement systems that reflect the multi-dimensional outcomes of hybridity, balancing financial, social, and public value considerations.</li>\n \n <li>The inherent ambiguity in hybrid organisations can lead to excessive oversight that hinders innovation and goal alignment. Practitioners need to establish governance frameworks that mitigate ambiguity while ensuring accountability and preserving the core mission of the hybrid entity.</li>\n \n <li>Public–private cooperation can be instrumental in leveraging additional public financing, not only for widening the resource base but also for gaining legitimacy.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"84 2","pages":"193-209"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.70000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our analysis of the literature indicates a growing prominence of hybridity within the field of public administration. Hybrid arrangements incorporate ambiguities and controversies, but they also represent opportunities for joint action and goal achievement. The difficulties inherent in hybridity originate from the dichotomous view of the public–private divide and the underdeveloped measurement instruments. The contributions of this special issue address these challenges, providing extensive evidence as to the empirical reality of the manifold aspects of hybrid public management. Encouragingly, this knowledge enabled us to revisit existing hybridity models and provide an up-to-date Framework for Hybridised Public Management to further advance the development of theory and practice. Drawing on this framework, we suggest future research in key areas.

Points for practitioners

  • Public managers in hybrid organisations must adeptly communicate with varied audiences, each with distinct expectations. This requires tailoring messages to demonstrate the organisation's multi-faceted value creation, encompassing public, private, and social benefits, to secure stakeholder buy-in and support.
  • The integration of divergent goals and logics in hybrid organisations demands innovative organisational designs to manage these incongruences. Hybrid organisational structures and processes should foster cooperation among public, private, and civil society actors.
  • Traditional financial metrics often inadequately capture the complexity and societal value of hybrid arrangements. Practitioners should adopt and develop performance measurement systems that reflect the multi-dimensional outcomes of hybridity, balancing financial, social, and public value considerations.
  • The inherent ambiguity in hybrid organisations can lead to excessive oversight that hinders innovation and goal alignment. Practitioners need to establish governance frameworks that mitigate ambiguity while ensuring accountability and preserving the core mission of the hybrid entity.
  • Public–private cooperation can be instrumental in leveraging additional public financing, not only for widening the resource base but also for gaining legitimacy.
混合公共管理:专刊导论
我们对文献的分析表明,混杂在公共行政领域日益突出。混合安排包含了歧义和争议,但它们也代表了联合行动和实现目标的机会。混合性固有的困难源于公私划分的二分法和不发达的测量工具。本期特刊的文章论述了这些挑战,为混合型公共管理多方面的经验现实提供了广泛的证据。令人鼓舞的是,这些知识使我们能够重新审视现有的混合模型,并为混合公共管理提供一个最新的框架,以进一步推动理论和实践的发展。根据这一框架,我们建议未来在关键领域进行研究。混合型组织中的公共管理者必须熟练地与不同的受众沟通,每个受众都有不同的期望。这需要定制信息,以展示组织的多方面价值创造,包括公共、私人和社会利益,以确保利益相关者的购买和支持。混合组织中不同目标和逻辑的整合需要创新的组织设计来管理这些不一致。混合组织结构和流程应促进公共、私人和民间社会行动者之间的合作。传统的财务指标往往不能充分反映混合安排的复杂性和社会价值。从业者应该采用和开发反映混合的多维结果的绩效衡量系统,平衡财务、社会和公共价值考虑。混合型组织固有的模糊性可能导致过度监督,阻碍创新和目标一致。从业者需要建立治理框架,在确保问责制和保留混合实体的核心使命的同时减轻模糊性。公私合作可以在利用额外的公共资金方面发挥重要作用,不仅可以扩大资源基础,而且可以获得合法性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信