Skye Davis, Anthony Chariton, Kate J. Brandis, Natalie Hejl, Adam J. Stow
{"title":"Tracing Waterbirds in Water: A Pilot Study on the Utility of eDNA Monitoring for Inland Australian Waterbirds","authors":"Skye Davis, Anthony Chariton, Kate J. Brandis, Natalie Hejl, Adam J. Stow","doi":"10.1111/aec.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Australia's vast network of inland wetlands attracts thousands of waterbirds to congregate and breed during ‘boom’ periods of rainfall and productivity. Monitoring waterbird biodiversity predominantly relies on annual aerial and ground-based surveys, which may miss rare or elusive species of conservation importance. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is being increasingly used as a tool for rapid biodiversity assessments across a wide range of ecosystems. Before eDNA can be routinely applied to new ecosystems, assays need to be optimised to address several challenges, including primer bias, reference database limitations, and data curation strategies. Here, we used an eDNA assay to detect avian species at four inland wetlands in south-eastern Australia. We assessed the impact of filtering strategies on waterbird detection probabilities and compared results against historical observational survey records. Our eDNA assay identified up to 40% of waterbirds historically recorded at the sites. Waterbirds detected with eDNA included the elusive and endangered Australasian bittern, migratory species such as gull-billed tern and whiskered tern, and an introduced feral goose not previously recorded. Community composition varied with filtering and detection approaches, highlighting the importance of assessing the impact of data curation on species detection with respect to historical species records. This study demonstrates the potential for eDNA to be incorporated into waterbird monitoring programmes. Future research should prioritise improving reference databases and optimising field sampling protocols for these ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aec.70094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Australia's vast network of inland wetlands attracts thousands of waterbirds to congregate and breed during ‘boom’ periods of rainfall and productivity. Monitoring waterbird biodiversity predominantly relies on annual aerial and ground-based surveys, which may miss rare or elusive species of conservation importance. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is being increasingly used as a tool for rapid biodiversity assessments across a wide range of ecosystems. Before eDNA can be routinely applied to new ecosystems, assays need to be optimised to address several challenges, including primer bias, reference database limitations, and data curation strategies. Here, we used an eDNA assay to detect avian species at four inland wetlands in south-eastern Australia. We assessed the impact of filtering strategies on waterbird detection probabilities and compared results against historical observational survey records. Our eDNA assay identified up to 40% of waterbirds historically recorded at the sites. Waterbirds detected with eDNA included the elusive and endangered Australasian bittern, migratory species such as gull-billed tern and whiskered tern, and an introduced feral goose not previously recorded. Community composition varied with filtering and detection approaches, highlighting the importance of assessing the impact of data curation on species detection with respect to historical species records. This study demonstrates the potential for eDNA to be incorporated into waterbird monitoring programmes. Future research should prioritise improving reference databases and optimising field sampling protocols for these ecosystems.
澳大利亚广阔的内陆湿地网络吸引了成千上万的水鸟在降雨和生产力的“繁荣”时期聚集和繁殖。监测水鸟的生物多样性主要依靠每年的空中和地面调查,这可能会错过稀有或难以捉摸的保护重要性物种。环境DNA元条形码(Environmental DNA metabarcoding, eDNA)正越来越多地作为一种工具被广泛应用于各种生态系统的生物多样性快速评估。在将eDNA常规应用于新的生态系统之前,需要对分析方法进行优化,以应对一些挑战,包括引物偏差、参考数据库限制和数据管理策略。在这里,我们使用eDNA测定法检测了澳大利亚东南部四个内陆湿地的鸟类物种。我们评估了过滤策略对水鸟探测概率的影响,并将结果与历史观测调查记录进行了比较。我们的eDNA分析鉴定出了历史上在这些地点记录的多达40%的水鸟。检测到携带eDNA的水鸟包括难以捉摸和濒临灭绝的澳大利亚麻鸦,迁徙物种,如鸥嘴燕鸥和须燕鸥,以及一种以前没有记录的引进的野鹅。群落组成随过滤和检测方法的不同而变化,这突出了评估数据管理对物种检测的影响的重要性。这项研究证明了将eDNA纳入水鸟监测计划的潜力。未来的研究应优先考虑改善这些生态系统的参考数据库和优化野外采样协议。
期刊介绍:
Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere.
Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region.
Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.