Group relative deprivation and different forms of political actions: The role of the target outgroup

IF 4.2 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
TOMISLAV PAVLOVIĆ, INGRID STORM, RENATA FRANC
{"title":"Group relative deprivation and different forms of political actions: The role of the target outgroup","authors":"TOMISLAV PAVLOVIĆ,&nbsp;INGRID STORM,&nbsp;RENATA FRANC","doi":"10.1111/1475-6765.12731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many contemporary researchers agree that group relative deprivation is a driver of political actions against outgroups. However, both relative deprivation and political actions are complex phenomena, making it important to further study this relationship in the context of other relevant variables. One such variable could be the specific outgroup. The purpose of our study was to evaluate differences in the contribution of group relative deprivation to the prediction of activist and radicalised intentions against two outgroups – Muslims and senior citizens. The multi-group structural equation modelling was applied separately on nationally representative samples of youth from Germany (<i>N</i> = 1,056), Norway (<i>N</i> = 376) and the United Kingdom (UK) (<i>N</i> = 1053). Group relative deprivation exhibited a robust relationship with activist intentions after controlling for general aggression, social desirability bias, age and gender, except in the UK, where the relationship between activist intentions and relative deprivation was stronger with Muslims as the target outgroup. The relationship between relative deprivation and radicalised intentions depended on the target outgroup across countries – it was related to radicalised intentions only against Muslims. The meaning and implications of these results are briefly discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":48273,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Political Research","volume":"64 3","pages":"1120-1141"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Political Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6765.12731","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many contemporary researchers agree that group relative deprivation is a driver of political actions against outgroups. However, both relative deprivation and political actions are complex phenomena, making it important to further study this relationship in the context of other relevant variables. One such variable could be the specific outgroup. The purpose of our study was to evaluate differences in the contribution of group relative deprivation to the prediction of activist and radicalised intentions against two outgroups – Muslims and senior citizens. The multi-group structural equation modelling was applied separately on nationally representative samples of youth from Germany (N = 1,056), Norway (N = 376) and the United Kingdom (UK) (N = 1053). Group relative deprivation exhibited a robust relationship with activist intentions after controlling for general aggression, social desirability bias, age and gender, except in the UK, where the relationship between activist intentions and relative deprivation was stronger with Muslims as the target outgroup. The relationship between relative deprivation and radicalised intentions depended on the target outgroup across countries – it was related to radicalised intentions only against Muslims. The meaning and implications of these results are briefly discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

群体相对剥夺与不同形式的政治行动:目标外群体的作用
许多当代研究人员都认为,群体相对剥夺是针对外部群体的政治行动的驱动因素。然而,相对剥夺和政治行动都是复杂的现象,因此必须在其他相关变量的背景下进一步研究这种关系。其中一个变量可能是特定的外群体。我们研究的目的是评估群体相对剥夺在预测针对两个外群体(穆斯林和老年人)的激进和激进意图方面的贡献差异。多组结构方程模型分别应用于德国(N = 1056)、挪威(N = 376)和英国(N = 1053)具有全国代表性的青年样本。在控制了一般攻击性、社会期望偏差、年龄和性别后,群体相对剥夺与激进意图之间表现出了强有力的关系,但在英国,激进意图和相对剥夺之间的关系在穆斯林作为目标外群体时更为强烈。相对剥夺和激进意图之间的关系取决于各国的目标外群体——它只与针对穆斯林的激进意图有关。简要讨论了这些结果的意义和含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.70%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: European Journal of Political Research specialises in articles articulating theoretical and comparative perspectives in political science, and welcomes both quantitative and qualitative approaches. EJPR also publishes short research notes outlining ongoing research in more specific areas of research. The Journal includes the Political Data Yearbook, published as a double issue at the end of each volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信