Clinical feasibility of high-power short-duration strategy at the sites adjacent to the esophagus during laser balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation

IF 1.7 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Haruta Kato MD, Yoshihisa Naruse MD, PhD, Yutaro Kaneko MD, Taro Narumi MD, PhD, Makoto Sano MD, PhD, Yuichiro Maekawa MD, PhD
{"title":"Clinical feasibility of high-power short-duration strategy at the sites adjacent to the esophagus during laser balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation","authors":"Haruta Kato MD,&nbsp;Yoshihisa Naruse MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yutaro Kaneko MD,&nbsp;Taro Narumi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Makoto Sano MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yuichiro Maekawa MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/joa3.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Laser balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation is an established therapeutic option for atrial fibrillation. However, elevated esophageal temperature is sometimes problematic and increases the risk of collateral esophageal damage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different power settings at sites where sudden esophageal temperature increases were documented.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled 50 ablation sites in 11 patients where the esophageal temperature reached 39°C within 5 s after ablation. We applied four power settings (12, 10, 8.5, and 5.5 W), and ablation was immediately stopped when the esophageal temperature reached 39°C. Efficacy outcomes included ablation time and total energy, calculated as the product of power and ablation time. Safety outcomes included maximal esophageal temperature and area under the temperature–time curve above 39°C.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Although ablation time was the longest in the 5.5 W group (12 W: 3.1 ± 2.1 s, 10 W: 3.6 ± 2.7 s, 8.5 W: 4.7 ± 3.9 s, 5.5 W: 8.0 ± 7.2 s; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), total energy did not differ among the four groups (40 ± 35, 35 ± 26, 38 ± 31, and 40 ± 39 J, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.864). There were no significant differences in maximal esophageal temperature (40.2 ± 1.7, 40.3 ± 1.9, 40.1 ± 1.5, and 39.8 ± 1.1°C, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.532) or the area under the temperature–time curve above 39°C (16 ± 49, 18 ± 57, 12 ± 29, and 7 ± 14°C・<i>t</i>, respectively; <i>p</i> = 0.564) among the four groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A high-power, short-duration strategy might allow comparable energy application without excessive esophageal collateral damage, as estimated by the esophageal temperature. However, further research using gastrointestinal endoscopy to evaluate esophageal injury is needed to confirm our results.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arrhythmia","volume":"41 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joa3.70121","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arrhythmia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joa3.70121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Laser balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation is an established therapeutic option for atrial fibrillation. However, elevated esophageal temperature is sometimes problematic and increases the risk of collateral esophageal damage. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different power settings at sites where sudden esophageal temperature increases were documented.

Methods

We enrolled 50 ablation sites in 11 patients where the esophageal temperature reached 39°C within 5 s after ablation. We applied four power settings (12, 10, 8.5, and 5.5 W), and ablation was immediately stopped when the esophageal temperature reached 39°C. Efficacy outcomes included ablation time and total energy, calculated as the product of power and ablation time. Safety outcomes included maximal esophageal temperature and area under the temperature–time curve above 39°C.

Results

Although ablation time was the longest in the 5.5 W group (12 W: 3.1 ± 2.1 s, 10 W: 3.6 ± 2.7 s, 8.5 W: 4.7 ± 3.9 s, 5.5 W: 8.0 ± 7.2 s; p < 0.001), total energy did not differ among the four groups (40 ± 35, 35 ± 26, 38 ± 31, and 40 ± 39 J, respectively; p = 0.864). There were no significant differences in maximal esophageal temperature (40.2 ± 1.7, 40.3 ± 1.9, 40.1 ± 1.5, and 39.8 ± 1.1°C, respectively; p = 0.532) or the area under the temperature–time curve above 39°C (16 ± 49, 18 ± 57, 12 ± 29, and 7 ± 14°C・t, respectively; p = 0.564) among the four groups.

Conclusions

A high-power, short-duration strategy might allow comparable energy application without excessive esophageal collateral damage, as estimated by the esophageal temperature. However, further research using gastrointestinal endoscopy to evaluate esophageal injury is needed to confirm our results.

Abstract Image

激光球囊肺静脉隔离术中食道邻近部位高功率短时间策略的临床可行性
基于激光球囊的肺静脉隔离是房颤的一种治疗选择。然而,食道温度升高有时是有问题的,并增加了附带食道损伤的风险。本研究旨在评估不同功率设置在有记录的食道突然温度升高部位的疗效和安全性。方法选取11例食管温度在5 s内达到39℃的患者,共50个消融部位。我们使用了四种功率设置(12、10、8.5和5.5 W),当食管温度达到39°C时立即停止消融。疗效结果包括消融时间和总能量,以功率和消融时间的乘积计算。安全性指标包括最高食道温度和高于39°C的温度-时间曲线下面积。结果5.5 W组消融时间最长(12 W: 3.1±2.1 s, 10 W: 3.6±2.7 s, 8.5 W: 4.7±3.9 s, 5.5 W: 8.0±7.2 s);p < 0.001),总能量在四组间无差异(分别为40±35、35±26、38±31和40±39 J);p = 0.864)。两组最高食道温度分别为40.2±1.7、40.3±1.9、40.1±1.5、39.8±1.1℃,差异无统计学意义;p = 0.532)或39℃以上温度-时间曲线下面积(分别为16±49、18±57、12±29、7±14℃);P = 0.564)。结论:根据食道温度估计,高功率、短时间的策略可能允许相当的能量应用,而不会造成过多的食管附带损伤。然而,需要进一步的研究使用胃肠道内窥镜评估食管损伤来证实我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arrhythmia
Journal of Arrhythmia CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
127
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信