A Hitchhiker's Guide to Good Prompting Practices for Large Language Models in Radiology

IF 5.1 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Satvik Tripathi , Dana Alkhulaifat MD , Shawn Lyo MD , Rithvik Sukumaran , Bolin Li MS , Vedant Acharya MD , Rafe McBeth PhD , Tessa S. Cook MD, PhD
{"title":"A Hitchhiker's Guide to Good Prompting Practices for Large Language Models in Radiology","authors":"Satvik Tripathi ,&nbsp;Dana Alkhulaifat MD ,&nbsp;Shawn Lyo MD ,&nbsp;Rithvik Sukumaran ,&nbsp;Bolin Li MS ,&nbsp;Vedant Acharya MD ,&nbsp;Rafe McBeth PhD ,&nbsp;Tessa S. Cook MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacr.2025.02.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Large language models (LLMs) are reshaping radiology through their advanced capabilities in tasks such as medical report generation and clinical decision support. However, their effectiveness is heavily influenced by prompt engineering—the design of input prompts that guide the model’s responses. This review aims to illustrate how different prompt engineering techniques, including zero-shot, one-shot, few-shot, chain of thought, and tree of thought, affect LLM performance in a radiology context. In addition, we explore the impact of prompt complexity and temperature settings on the relevance and accuracy of model outputs. This article highlights the importance of precise and iterative prompt design to enhance LLM reliability in radiology, emphasizing the need for methodological rigor and transparency to drive progress and ensure ethical use in health care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","volume":"22 7","pages":"Pages 841-847"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144025001565","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are reshaping radiology through their advanced capabilities in tasks such as medical report generation and clinical decision support. However, their effectiveness is heavily influenced by prompt engineering—the design of input prompts that guide the model’s responses. This review aims to illustrate how different prompt engineering techniques, including zero-shot, one-shot, few-shot, chain of thought, and tree of thought, affect LLM performance in a radiology context. In addition, we explore the impact of prompt complexity and temperature settings on the relevance and accuracy of model outputs. This article highlights the importance of precise and iterative prompt design to enhance LLM reliability in radiology, emphasizing the need for methodological rigor and transparency to drive progress and ensure ethical use in health care.
《放射学中大语言模型的良好提示实践指南》
大型语言模型(llm)通过其在医疗报告生成和临床决策支持等任务中的先进功能正在重塑放射学。然而,它们的有效性在很大程度上受到提示工程的影响,即引导模型响应的输入提示的设计。本综述旨在说明不同的提示工程技术,包括零枪、单枪、少枪、思维链和思维树,如何影响放射学背景下LLM的性能。此外,我们还探讨了提示复杂性和温度设置对模型输出的相关性和准确性的影响。本文强调了精确和迭代的提示设计对提高放射学法学硕士可靠性的重要性,强调了方法的严谨性和透明度的必要性,以推动进步并确保卫生保健中的道德使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American College of Radiology
Journal of the American College of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.90%
发文量
312
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American College of Radiology, JACR informs its readers of timely, pertinent, and important topics affecting the practice of diagnostic radiologists, interventional radiologists, medical physicists, and radiation oncologists. In so doing, JACR improves their practices and helps optimize their role in the health care system. By providing a forum for informative, well-written articles on health policy, clinical practice, practice management, data science, and education, JACR engages readers in a dialogue that ultimately benefits patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信