Identifying critical moments of patient anxiety throughout the MRI care pathway: From prescription to results

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Matthieu L.G. Fernandez , Pierrick Laulan , Antonio Ribeiro , Marie Becar , David Higué , Jérôme Dimet
{"title":"Identifying critical moments of patient anxiety throughout the MRI care pathway: From prescription to results","authors":"Matthieu L.G. Fernandez ,&nbsp;Pierrick Laulan ,&nbsp;Antonio Ribeiro ,&nbsp;Marie Becar ,&nbsp;David Higué ,&nbsp;Jérôme Dimet","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate peak anxiety timing during MRI patient management, identify factors associated with heightened anxiety levels, and evaluate their impact on examination processes, whilst developing targeted recommendations for improved anxiety management protocols.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We prospectively included 856 adult outpatients scheduled for MRI examination. Peak anxiety was measured using the Anxiety Thermometer. We related it to personal and situational factors of the MRI examinations. Statistical analyses were conducted in three stages: (1) distribution of maximum anxiety scores according to different key moments in patient management; (2) links between personal and situational factors and high anxiety in patients; (3) influence of high anxiety in patients on their management. To conduct these analyses, we used chi-square tests, pairwise comparisons and linear and logistic regressions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Approximately 28% of outpatients exhibited state anxiety. Women, patients receiving intravenous contrast injection and those undergoing head and neck MRI were particularly at risk of developing anxiety beyond the pathological threshold. The MRI examination itself, waiting for the results, and preparation’s phase are the moments most associated with anxiety peaks.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Undergoing an MRI, from prescription to results, is highly anxiety-inducing for many patients, with moments of high uncertainty presenting the greatest risk for peak anxiety. Identifying these moments and associated risk factors can guide the development of targeted strategies to reduce anxiety, improve patient experience, and optimize care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X2500350X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate peak anxiety timing during MRI patient management, identify factors associated with heightened anxiety levels, and evaluate their impact on examination processes, whilst developing targeted recommendations for improved anxiety management protocols.

Methods

We prospectively included 856 adult outpatients scheduled for MRI examination. Peak anxiety was measured using the Anxiety Thermometer. We related it to personal and situational factors of the MRI examinations. Statistical analyses were conducted in three stages: (1) distribution of maximum anxiety scores according to different key moments in patient management; (2) links between personal and situational factors and high anxiety in patients; (3) influence of high anxiety in patients on their management. To conduct these analyses, we used chi-square tests, pairwise comparisons and linear and logistic regressions.

Results

Approximately 28% of outpatients exhibited state anxiety. Women, patients receiving intravenous contrast injection and those undergoing head and neck MRI were particularly at risk of developing anxiety beyond the pathological threshold. The MRI examination itself, waiting for the results, and preparation’s phase are the moments most associated with anxiety peaks.

Conclusions

Undergoing an MRI, from prescription to results, is highly anxiety-inducing for many patients, with moments of high uncertainty presenting the greatest risk for peak anxiety. Identifying these moments and associated risk factors can guide the development of targeted strategies to reduce anxiety, improve patient experience, and optimize care.
识别患者焦虑的关键时刻在整个MRI护理途径:从处方到结果
目的研究MRI患者管理期间的焦虑峰值时间,确定与焦虑水平升高相关的因素,并评估其对检查过程的影响,同时为改进焦虑管理方案提出有针对性的建议。方法前瞻性纳入856例拟行MRI检查的成人门诊患者。使用焦虑温度计测量焦虑峰值。我们将其与MRI检查的个人和情境因素联系起来。分三个阶段进行统计分析:(1)根据患者管理的不同关键时刻,最大焦虑评分的分布;(2)个体因素与情境因素与患者高焦虑的关系;(3)患者高度焦虑对其管理的影响。为了进行这些分析,我们使用了卡方检验、两两比较以及线性和逻辑回归。结果约28%的门诊患者表现出状态焦虑。女性、接受静脉造影剂注射的患者以及接受头颈部核磁共振成像(MRI)的患者尤其容易出现超出病理阈值的焦虑。核磁共振检查本身、等待结果以及准备阶段是与焦虑高峰最相关的时刻。结论:对许多患者来说,从处方到结果,接受核磁共振检查是高度焦虑的诱发因素,高度不确定的时刻是焦虑高峰的最大风险。识别这些时刻和相关的风险因素可以指导制定有针对性的策略,以减少焦虑,改善患者体验,优化护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信