Performance of conventional MRI and endoscopy in assessing complete tumor response following immunotherapy-based neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Gengyun Miao , Jingjing Liu , Wentao Tang , Lechi Ye , Lamei Deng , Tianyong Xu , Mengjiang He , Wei Su , Jiyuan Zhang , Shaohua Lu , Lingli Chen , Haoxiang Xuan , Fei Liang , Guoxiang Hu , Shengxiang Rao , Mengsu Zeng , Liheng Liu
{"title":"Performance of conventional MRI and endoscopy in assessing complete tumor response following immunotherapy-based neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer","authors":"Gengyun Miao ,&nbsp;Jingjing Liu ,&nbsp;Wentao Tang ,&nbsp;Lechi Ye ,&nbsp;Lamei Deng ,&nbsp;Tianyong Xu ,&nbsp;Mengjiang He ,&nbsp;Wei Su ,&nbsp;Jiyuan Zhang ,&nbsp;Shaohua Lu ,&nbsp;Lingli Chen ,&nbsp;Haoxiang Xuan ,&nbsp;Fei Liang ,&nbsp;Guoxiang Hu ,&nbsp;Shengxiang Rao ,&nbsp;Mengsu Zeng ,&nbsp;Liheng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Endoscopy and MRI are essential tools for assessing treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, their accuracy in identifying pathological complete response (pCR; ie, ypT0N0) following immunotherapy-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (iNCRT) remains uncertain. This study evaluates the performance of endoscopy and MRI in reflecting ypT0 status and assesses MRI efficacy for lymph node metastasis in LARC following iNCRT.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A retrospective study was conducted on LARC patients who underwent total mesorectal excision after iNCRT between March 2022 and June 2023. A cohort of 130 NCRT-only patients was matched in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, and clinical stage. Restaging assessments included endoscopy, and T2-weighted/diffusion-weighted MRI (T2DWI) for primary tumors, as well as MRI for lymph node evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were determined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 130 NCRT-treated patients (mean age 57.1 years; 90 male patients), T2DWI showed comparable specificity to endoscopy (85.1 % vs. 88.8 %) but limited sensitivity (50 % vs. 16.7 %) in diagnosing ypT0. In 65 patients (mean age 56.6 years; 45 male patients) treated with iNCRT, MRI and endoscopy showed poor performance for ypT0, with AUCs ranging from 0.54 to 0.57. A 3 mm short-axis diameter cutoff effectively identified ypN0 status (AUC 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.64–0.86).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Endoscopy and MRI cannot reliably identify ypT0 status, but a 3 mm cutoff for short-axis diameter on MRI may assist in diagnosing ypN0 in LARC patients treated with iNCRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 112267"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25003535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Endoscopy and MRI are essential tools for assessing treatment response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, their accuracy in identifying pathological complete response (pCR; ie, ypT0N0) following immunotherapy-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (iNCRT) remains uncertain. This study evaluates the performance of endoscopy and MRI in reflecting ypT0 status and assesses MRI efficacy for lymph node metastasis in LARC following iNCRT.

Materials and methods

A retrospective study was conducted on LARC patients who underwent total mesorectal excision after iNCRT between March 2022 and June 2023. A cohort of 130 NCRT-only patients was matched in a 1:2 ratio based on age, sex, and clinical stage. Restaging assessments included endoscopy, and T2-weighted/diffusion-weighted MRI (T2DWI) for primary tumors, as well as MRI for lymph node evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were determined.

Results

Among 130 NCRT-treated patients (mean age 57.1 years; 90 male patients), T2DWI showed comparable specificity to endoscopy (85.1 % vs. 88.8 %) but limited sensitivity (50 % vs. 16.7 %) in diagnosing ypT0. In 65 patients (mean age 56.6 years; 45 male patients) treated with iNCRT, MRI and endoscopy showed poor performance for ypT0, with AUCs ranging from 0.54 to 0.57. A 3 mm short-axis diameter cutoff effectively identified ypN0 status (AUC 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.64–0.86).

Conclusion

Endoscopy and MRI cannot reliably identify ypT0 status, but a 3 mm cutoff for short-axis diameter on MRI may assist in diagnosing ypN0 in LARC patients treated with iNCRT.
传统MRI和内镜在评估基于免疫疗法的直肠癌新辅助治疗后肿瘤完全反应中的作用
目的内镜和MRI是评估局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)治疗反应的重要工具。然而,它们在鉴别病理完全反应(pCR;以免疫治疗为基础的新辅助放化疗(iNCRT)后的ypT0N0仍不确定。本研究评估了内镜和MRI在反映ypT0状态方面的表现,并评估了MRI对iNCRT后LARC淋巴结转移的疗效。材料与方法回顾性研究2022年3月至2023年6月间行iNCRT术后全肠系膜切除术的LARC患者。根据年龄、性别和临床分期,130例ncrt患者按1:2的比例进行配对。重新评估包括内窥镜检查,原发肿瘤的t2加权/弥散加权MRI (T2DWI),以及淋巴结评估的MRI。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,并确定受试者工作特征曲线下面积(aus)。结果在130例ncrt治疗的患者中(平均年龄57.1岁;90例男性患者),T2DWI诊断ypT0的特异性与内窥镜相当(85.1%对88.8%),但敏感性有限(50%对16.7%)。65例患者(平均年龄56.6岁;45例(男)患者行iNCRT、MRI和内镜检查后,ypT0表现不佳,auc范围为0.54 ~ 0.57。3 mm短轴直径截断有效地识别了ypN0状态(AUC 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64-0.86)。结论内镜和MRI不能可靠地识别ypN0状态,但MRI短轴直径3 mm的截距可能有助于诊断iNCRT治疗的LARC患者的ypN0。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
398
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field. Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信