Is selective hospitalist–orthopedic surgeon co-management based on the Charlson comorbidity index useful in peri-operative care of total hip arthroplasty?
{"title":"Is selective hospitalist–orthopedic surgeon co-management based on the Charlson comorbidity index useful in peri-operative care of total hip arthroplasty?","authors":"Kazuhiko Sonoda , Yusuke Kubo , Sanshiro Inoue , Toshihiko Hara","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2025.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for hip diseases, but peri-operative management of patients with multiple comorbidities is challenging due to an increased risk of medical complications. Hospitalist–orthopedic surgeon co-management (HOC) has been reported to improve peri-operative care, but its effectiveness and impact on healthcare resources remain uncertain. This prospective, single-center study evaluated the utility of selective HOC based on the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in THA peri-operative management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study included 90 consecutive cases with primary THA by a single orthopedic surgeon. Based on CCI, patients were divided into an HOC group (CCI score ≥2) and non-HOC group (CCI score <2). The HOC group received peri-operative care from a hospitalist and orthopedic surgeon, while non-HOC group was managed by an orthopedic surgeon alone. Medical and surgery-related complications, hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and costs were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 17 cases (19%) in the HOC group and 73 (81%) in non-HOC group. The mean CCI score was 3.1 ± 1.3 in the HOC group and 0.4 ± 0.5 in the non-HOC group. Medical complications were more frequent in the HOC group (35% <em>vs.</em> 4%), while surgery-related complications were comparable. No statistically significant difference was observed in length of stay, 30-day mortality, and costs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Selective indication for HOC based on CCI effectively identified high-risk patients, enabling timely intervention for medical complications without prolonging hospital stay. This strategy may mitigate peri-operative medical risks while optimizing resource use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 128-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705125000155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for hip diseases, but peri-operative management of patients with multiple comorbidities is challenging due to an increased risk of medical complications. Hospitalist–orthopedic surgeon co-management (HOC) has been reported to improve peri-operative care, but its effectiveness and impact on healthcare resources remain uncertain. This prospective, single-center study evaluated the utility of selective HOC based on the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in THA peri-operative management.
Methods
This study included 90 consecutive cases with primary THA by a single orthopedic surgeon. Based on CCI, patients were divided into an HOC group (CCI score ≥2) and non-HOC group (CCI score <2). The HOC group received peri-operative care from a hospitalist and orthopedic surgeon, while non-HOC group was managed by an orthopedic surgeon alone. Medical and surgery-related complications, hospital length of stay, 30-day mortality, and costs were evaluated.
Results
There were 17 cases (19%) in the HOC group and 73 (81%) in non-HOC group. The mean CCI score was 3.1 ± 1.3 in the HOC group and 0.4 ± 0.5 in the non-HOC group. Medical complications were more frequent in the HOC group (35% vs. 4%), while surgery-related complications were comparable. No statistically significant difference was observed in length of stay, 30-day mortality, and costs.
Conclusions
Selective indication for HOC based on CCI effectively identified high-risk patients, enabling timely intervention for medical complications without prolonging hospital stay. This strategy may mitigate peri-operative medical risks while optimizing resource use.
目的全髋关节置换术(THA)是髋关节疾病的有效治疗方法,但由于并发症的风险增加,有多种合并症的患者的围手术期管理具有挑战性。据报道,医院-骨科医生共同管理(HOC)可以改善围手术期护理,但其有效性和对医疗资源的影响仍不确定。这项前瞻性单中心研究评估了基于Charlson合并症指数(CCI)的选择性HOC在THA围手术期管理中的应用。方法本研究纳入由同一位骨科医生连续施行的90例原发性全髋关节置换术。根据CCI分为HOC组(CCI评分≥2)和非HOC组(CCI评分<;2)。HOC组接受住院医师和骨科医生的围手术期护理,而非HOC组由骨科医生单独管理。评估了医疗和手术相关并发症、住院时间、30天死亡率和费用。结果HOC组17例(19%),非HOC组73例(81%)。HOC组CCI平均评分为3.1±1.3分,非HOC组CCI平均评分为0.4±0.5分。医学并发症在HOC组更常见(35% vs. 4%),而手术相关并发症是相当的。在住院时间、30天死亡率和费用方面没有观察到统计学上的显著差异。结论基于CCI的HOC选择性适应证可有效识别高危患者,及时干预医疗并发症而不延长住院时间。该策略可在优化资源利用的同时降低围手术期医疗风险。