Enhancing safety, patient experience and outcomes in an independent UK ambulatory aesthetic surgical clinic

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Metin Nizamoglu, Nora Nugent, Marc Pacifico
{"title":"Enhancing safety, patient experience and outcomes in an independent UK ambulatory aesthetic surgical clinic","authors":"Metin Nizamoglu,&nbsp;Nora Nugent,&nbsp;Marc Pacifico","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The United Kingdom has witnessed a surge in independent aesthetic surgery clinics with ambulatory operating facilities. In this context, patient safety and satisfaction remain critical benchmarks of success.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study presents a detailed analysis of a private aesthetic surgery clinic’s systems to optimise patient outcomes and ensure safety in day-case surgeries under general anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data from 428 consecutive patients who underwent general anaesthesia for aesthetic surgical procedures at the clinic. Key metrics included times to discharge, complication rates and a patient questionnaire.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 428 patients, there were only four instances of urgent return to the operating theatre: three cases of postoperative infection and one patient requiring external transfer for a delayed presentation of a pulmonary embolus within 30 days of surgery. These findings correspond to a major complication rate of less than 2% (8/428), underscoring the safety of performing general anaesthesia aesthetic surgeries as day-case procedures when robust clinical systems are implemented.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results demonstrate that aesthetic surgical procedures can be safely and efficiently performed in a standalone clinic setting as day-case operations, with minimal complications and high satisfaction. This model highlights the potential for redefining standards of care in ambulatory aesthetic surgery, emphasising the importance of rigorous safety protocols and patient-centred approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 141-147"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525003870","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The United Kingdom has witnessed a surge in independent aesthetic surgery clinics with ambulatory operating facilities. In this context, patient safety and satisfaction remain critical benchmarks of success.

Aim

This study presents a detailed analysis of a private aesthetic surgery clinic’s systems to optimise patient outcomes and ensure safety in day-case surgeries under general anaesthesia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively collected data from 428 consecutive patients who underwent general anaesthesia for aesthetic surgical procedures at the clinic. Key metrics included times to discharge, complication rates and a patient questionnaire.

Results

Among the 428 patients, there were only four instances of urgent return to the operating theatre: three cases of postoperative infection and one patient requiring external transfer for a delayed presentation of a pulmonary embolus within 30 days of surgery. These findings correspond to a major complication rate of less than 2% (8/428), underscoring the safety of performing general anaesthesia aesthetic surgeries as day-case procedures when robust clinical systems are implemented.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that aesthetic surgical procedures can be safely and efficiently performed in a standalone clinic setting as day-case operations, with minimal complications and high satisfaction. This model highlights the potential for redefining standards of care in ambulatory aesthetic surgery, emphasising the importance of rigorous safety protocols and patient-centred approaches.
加强安全,病人的经验和结果在一个独立的英国门诊美容外科诊所
背景:在英国,拥有流动手术设施的独立美容外科诊所数量激增。在这种情况下,患者安全和满意度仍然是成功的关键基准。目的:本研究详细分析了一家私人美容外科诊所的系统,以优化患者的结果,并确保全身麻醉下的日间手术的安全性。方法回顾性分析我院连续428例全麻美容手术患者的前瞻性资料。关键指标包括出院时间、并发症发生率和患者问卷调查。结果在428例患者中,只有4例患者紧急返回手术室:3例术后感染,1例患者因手术后30天内延迟出现肺栓塞而需要外部转移。这些发现对应于小于2%的主要并发症发生率(8/428),强调了在实施健全的临床系统时,将全身麻醉美容手术作为日常手术的安全性。结论本研究结果表明,在独立的临床环境下,美容外科手术可以安全有效地进行,并发症少,满意度高。该模型强调了重新定义门诊美容手术护理标准的潜力,强调了严格的安全协议和以患者为中心的方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信