Age-Friendly Communities and Mortality Risk Among Older Adults in China: A Study Based on the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS)

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hongyu Chen, George Grekousis, Jie Deng, Jiaxian Ji, Ziming Wang, Yilin Li, Jiaxuan Han, Zhixin Feng
{"title":"Age-Friendly Communities and Mortality Risk Among Older Adults in China: A Study Based on the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS)","authors":"Hongyu Chen,&nbsp;George Grekousis,&nbsp;Jie Deng,&nbsp;Jiaxian Ji,&nbsp;Ziming Wang,&nbsp;Yilin Li,&nbsp;Jiaxuan Han,&nbsp;Zhixin Feng","doi":"10.1155/hsc/1959158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> With the progression of aging and urbanization, the relationship between the external environment and health has gained increasing attention. This study examined the association between comprehensive community environments and mortality risk among older adults from a macro-level perspective.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> We used longitudinal data from the 2014–2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), which includes information on community environments. Guided by the World Health Organization’s framework for age-friendly communities, we constructed five domains: natural environment, medical support, living security, public education, and community support. Multilevel binary logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between these age-friendly community characteristics and mortality risk among older adults in 2018.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Among 3810 older adults (aged 60–117), a better natural environment (OR: 0.78 and 95% CI: 0.60–1.02) and stronger living security (OR: 0.41 and 95% CI: 0.26–0.65) were significantly associated with reduced mortality risk. Specifically, in communities with better medical support, older adults who were ethnic minorities, lived alone, or had higher household incomes exhibited a lower risk of mortality. Living security was particularly effective in reducing mortality risk among those living with a spouse. However, drinkers in communities with stronger community support showed a higher mortality risk.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> Mitigating environmental degradation and ensuring equitable service provision are essential for building age-friendly communities. While enhancing the health and wellbeing of all older adults is important, particular attention should be given to vulnerable groups, such as those with lower incomes or limited family support.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/1959158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/1959158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the progression of aging and urbanization, the relationship between the external environment and health has gained increasing attention. This study examined the association between comprehensive community environments and mortality risk among older adults from a macro-level perspective.

Methods: We used longitudinal data from the 2014–2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), which includes information on community environments. Guided by the World Health Organization’s framework for age-friendly communities, we constructed five domains: natural environment, medical support, living security, public education, and community support. Multilevel binary logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between these age-friendly community characteristics and mortality risk among older adults in 2018.

Results: Among 3810 older adults (aged 60–117), a better natural environment (OR: 0.78 and 95% CI: 0.60–1.02) and stronger living security (OR: 0.41 and 95% CI: 0.26–0.65) were significantly associated with reduced mortality risk. Specifically, in communities with better medical support, older adults who were ethnic minorities, lived alone, or had higher household incomes exhibited a lower risk of mortality. Living security was particularly effective in reducing mortality risk among those living with a spouse. However, drinkers in communities with stronger community support showed a higher mortality risk.

Conclusion: Mitigating environmental degradation and ensuring equitable service provision are essential for building age-friendly communities. While enhancing the health and wellbeing of all older adults is important, particular attention should be given to vulnerable groups, such as those with lower incomes or limited family support.

Abstract Image

中国老年友好社区与老年人死亡风险——基于中国纵向健康寿命调查的研究
背景:随着老龄化和城市化进程的推进,外部环境与健康的关系越来越受到关注。本研究从宏观层面考察了综合社区环境与老年人死亡风险之间的关系。方法:我们使用了2014-2018年中国纵向健康寿命调查(CLHLS)的纵向数据,其中包括社区环境信息。在世界卫生组织“老年人友好型社区”框架的指导下,我们构建了五个领域:自然环境、医疗支持、生活安全、公共教育和社区支持。2018年,研究人员使用多水平二元logistic回归模型来研究这些老年人友好型社区特征与老年人死亡风险之间的关系。结果:3810名老年人(60-117岁)中,较好的自然环境(OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.60-1.02)和较强的生活保障(OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.26-0.65)与降低死亡风险显著相关。具体而言,在医疗支持较好的社区,少数族裔、独居或家庭收入较高的老年人死亡风险较低。生活保障在降低与配偶同住者的死亡风险方面特别有效。然而,在社区支持更强的社区中,饮酒者的死亡风险更高。结论:缓解环境退化和确保公平的服务提供对于建设老年人友好型社区至关重要。虽然增进所有老年人的健康和福祉很重要,但应特别注意弱势群体,例如收入较低或家庭支助有限的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信