Understanding the Perspectives of School Children Who Stutter: A Rapid Review

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Alhanouf Yosef Alhazimi, Clare Carroll, Mary-Pat O'Malley-Keighran
{"title":"Understanding the Perspectives of School Children Who Stutter: A Rapid Review","authors":"Alhanouf Yosef Alhazimi,&nbsp;Clare Carroll,&nbsp;Mary-Pat O'Malley-Keighran","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Children who stutter have the right to express their views and be heard. However, in research on stuttering, attention tends to focus mainly on parental and adult perspectives. By actively engaging with children's viewpoints, we can enhance our understanding of their distinct needs and capabilities. This, in turn, enables the development of more personalised and child-centred interventions based on their lived experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This rapid review aimed to identify qualitative methods in the research literature employed to explore the perspectives of school children who stutter (SCWS) aged 6–12 years and identify topics discussed by the children in such research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods and Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>A rapid literature review was conducted using five databases: EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, EBSCO PsycINFO, Embase, and OVID Medline. The search strategy focused on qualitative or mixed-method peer-reviewed studies and included a manual search of the reference lists of identified papers. The search targeted studies involving school-age children who stutter and excluded grey literature. The findings are presented through data extraction tables and a narrative summary.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes and Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, all of which used at least one qualitative method to elicit the children's voices. A total of 14 methods across the 13 studies were identified. The most common method was open-ended questions as part of semi-structured interviews. In relation to what SCWS expressed about their talking, several insights emerged, including reports of wishing to participate in group discussions in school and fluency changes post-intervention. The findings revealed the multifaceted nature of the experiences of SCWS, from personal frustrations to positive transformations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This rapid review provides a comprehensive overview of current qualitative approaches to understanding the perspectives of SCWS. It highlights the need to include the voices of SCWS in research. It advocates for innovative, authentic approaches to data collection and emphasizes the necessity for further research to bridge gaps in understanding the experiences and perspectives of children who stutter.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <div><i>What is already known on the subject</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>Stuttering goes beyond the act of stuttering and the impact on SCWS is influenced by a range of factors. Listening to the perspectives of SCWS is important to understand their individual needs, which will help facilitate more child-centred practice. It is important to consider that the method of eliciting children's perspectives may affect the results.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What this paper adds to existing knowledge</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>This review identifies current methods used to listen to SCWS and identifies gaps in the research in relation to studies that focus exclusively on exploring the perspectives of SCWS on their talking. Furthermore, it identifies a range of issues that SCWS report as important in their lives.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n \n <div><i>What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?</i>\n \n <ul>\n \n <li>The review emphasises the necessity of researchers and clinicians employing multimethod approaches to listen to SCWS. It also underscores the importance of collaborating with SCWS themselves in addition to working with parents as proxies to ensure person-centred care. Refining these methods to actively include the perspectives of SCWS in decision-making leads to significant potential promote the agency of SCWS in both research and clinical contexts in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (United Nations 1989).</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1460-6984.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.70075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Children who stutter have the right to express their views and be heard. However, in research on stuttering, attention tends to focus mainly on parental and adult perspectives. By actively engaging with children's viewpoints, we can enhance our understanding of their distinct needs and capabilities. This, in turn, enables the development of more personalised and child-centred interventions based on their lived experiences.

Aim

This rapid review aimed to identify qualitative methods in the research literature employed to explore the perspectives of school children who stutter (SCWS) aged 6–12 years and identify topics discussed by the children in such research.

Methods and Procedures

A rapid literature review was conducted using five databases: EBSCO CINAHL, Scopus, EBSCO PsycINFO, Embase, and OVID Medline. The search strategy focused on qualitative or mixed-method peer-reviewed studies and included a manual search of the reference lists of identified papers. The search targeted studies involving school-age children who stutter and excluded grey literature. The findings are presented through data extraction tables and a narrative summary.

Outcomes and Results

Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, all of which used at least one qualitative method to elicit the children's voices. A total of 14 methods across the 13 studies were identified. The most common method was open-ended questions as part of semi-structured interviews. In relation to what SCWS expressed about their talking, several insights emerged, including reports of wishing to participate in group discussions in school and fluency changes post-intervention. The findings revealed the multifaceted nature of the experiences of SCWS, from personal frustrations to positive transformations.

Conclusions and Implications

This rapid review provides a comprehensive overview of current qualitative approaches to understanding the perspectives of SCWS. It highlights the need to include the voices of SCWS in research. It advocates for innovative, authentic approaches to data collection and emphasizes the necessity for further research to bridge gaps in understanding the experiences and perspectives of children who stutter.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject
  • Stuttering goes beyond the act of stuttering and the impact on SCWS is influenced by a range of factors. Listening to the perspectives of SCWS is important to understand their individual needs, which will help facilitate more child-centred practice. It is important to consider that the method of eliciting children's perspectives may affect the results.
What this paper adds to existing knowledge
  • This review identifies current methods used to listen to SCWS and identifies gaps in the research in relation to studies that focus exclusively on exploring the perspectives of SCWS on their talking. Furthermore, it identifies a range of issues that SCWS report as important in their lives.
What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?
  • The review emphasises the necessity of researchers and clinicians employing multimethod approaches to listen to SCWS. It also underscores the importance of collaborating with SCWS themselves in addition to working with parents as proxies to ensure person-centred care. Refining these methods to actively include the perspectives of SCWS in decision-making leads to significant potential promote the agency of SCWS in both research and clinical contexts in line with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (United Nations 1989).

Abstract Image

理解在校口吃儿童的观点:快速回顾
口吃的儿童有权表达自己的观点并被倾听。然而,在对口吃的研究中,人们的注意力往往主要集中在父母和成人的视角上。通过积极参与儿童的观点,我们可以加强对他们独特需求和能力的理解。这反过来又能够根据儿童的生活经历制定更加个性化和以儿童为中心的干预措施。目的本快速回顾旨在确定研究文献中用于探讨6-12岁学龄口吃儿童视角的定性方法,并确定这些研究中儿童讨论的主题。方法和步骤采用EBSCO CINAHL、Scopus、EBSCO PsycINFO、Embase和OVID Medline 5个数据库进行快速文献综述。搜索策略侧重于定性或混合方法的同行评议研究,并包括对已确定论文的参考文献列表的手动搜索。这项研究的目标是涉及口吃的学龄儿童的研究,并排除了灰色文献。研究结果通过数据提取表和叙述性摘要呈现。13项研究符合纳入标准,所有研究都至少使用了一种定性方法来引出儿童的声音。13项研究共确定了14种方法。最常见的方法是开放式问题,作为半结构化面试的一部分。关于SCWS对他们的谈话表达的看法,出现了一些见解,包括希望参加学校小组讨论的报告和干预后流利程度的变化。调查结果揭示了SCWS经历的多面性,从个人挫折到积极转变。结论和意义这篇快速的综述提供了目前定性方法的全面概述,以理解SCWS的观点。它强调了将SCWS的声音纳入研究的必要性。它倡导采用创新、真实的数据收集方法,并强调有必要进行进一步研究,以弥合在理解口吃儿童的经历和观点方面的差距。这篇论文补充了什么关于口吃这个主题的已知内容超出了口吃的行为,对SCWS的影响受到一系列因素的影响。聆听学童的意见对了解他们的个别需要很重要,这将有助推行更多以儿童为中心的做法。重要的是要考虑到,引起儿童观点的方法可能会影响结果。本综述确定了目前用于倾听SCWS的方法,并确定了与专门探索SCWS说话视角的研究相关的研究中的空白。此外,它还确定了SCWS报告的生活中重要的一系列问题。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?这篇综述强调了研究人员和临床医生采用多方法聆听SCWS的必要性。它还强调了与SCWS本身合作的重要性,除了与父母作为代理合作,以确保以人为本的护理。根据联合国儿童权利公约(United Nations 1989),改进这些方法,积极地将SCWS的观点纳入决策过程,将极大地促进SCWS在研究和临床环境中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信