A Cross-Organisational Collaboration to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living in Children: A Critical Reflection

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sarah T. Ryan, Jennifer Norman
{"title":"A Cross-Organisational Collaboration to Promote Healthy Eating and Active Living in Children: A Critical Reflection","authors":"Sarah T. Ryan,&nbsp;Jennifer Norman","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To critically reflect on a collaborative research partnership between university-based researchers, a state government-funded health promotion workforce, and policy makers, focused on promoting healthy eating and active living for children funded by the New South Wales (NSW) Health Prevention Research Support Program (PRSP).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Importance of Study</h3>\n \n <p>Government bodies and academic institutions frequently operate in silos, creating knowledge translation challenges. Research takes time to reach practitioners, hindering uptake of evidence-based interventions in public health settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Type</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative reflective evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty key stakeholders from the PRSP funded ‘EnHANCE’ research group collaboration were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. Open-ended questions were structured around the six themes of Gibbs' Reflective Cycle (1998), to allow participants to reflect on their collaborative experiences spanning July 2017 to June 2022. Participants included University of Wollongong academics, PhD candidates, and NSW Health staff (managers and health promotion officers). Data were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis process, systematically identifying, analysing, and grouping into themes to highlight both the challenges and successes experienced by participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fifteen participants responded. Challenges included COVID-19 disruptions, navigating jurisdictional diversity, and initial misalignment of organisational priorities. Notable successes emerged, including the establishment of a strong, equitable research partnership, timely local implementation of research findings, enhanced cross-jurisdictional learning and gradual alignment of research and health promotion priorities as relationships strengthened. A critical factor for the success of this collaboration has been the successive PRSP funding rounds which have given partnerships time to mature and be productive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The PRSP demonstrates an effective funding model for facilitating meaningful collaboration between academics, policymakers, and practitioners. Future funding schemes should aim to include opportunities to build strong collaborations, and researchers should integrate and explore adaptive, responsive models of cross-organisational research partnerships.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70063","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To critically reflect on a collaborative research partnership between university-based researchers, a state government-funded health promotion workforce, and policy makers, focused on promoting healthy eating and active living for children funded by the New South Wales (NSW) Health Prevention Research Support Program (PRSP).

Importance of Study

Government bodies and academic institutions frequently operate in silos, creating knowledge translation challenges. Research takes time to reach practitioners, hindering uptake of evidence-based interventions in public health settings.

Study Type

Qualitative reflective evaluation.

Methods

Thirty key stakeholders from the PRSP funded ‘EnHANCE’ research group collaboration were invited to complete an anonymous online survey. Open-ended questions were structured around the six themes of Gibbs' Reflective Cycle (1998), to allow participants to reflect on their collaborative experiences spanning July 2017 to June 2022. Participants included University of Wollongong academics, PhD candidates, and NSW Health staff (managers and health promotion officers). Data were analysed using a deductive thematic analysis process, systematically identifying, analysing, and grouping into themes to highlight both the challenges and successes experienced by participants.

Results

Fifteen participants responded. Challenges included COVID-19 disruptions, navigating jurisdictional diversity, and initial misalignment of organisational priorities. Notable successes emerged, including the establishment of a strong, equitable research partnership, timely local implementation of research findings, enhanced cross-jurisdictional learning and gradual alignment of research and health promotion priorities as relationships strengthened. A critical factor for the success of this collaboration has been the successive PRSP funding rounds which have given partnerships time to mature and be productive.

Conclusions

The PRSP demonstrates an effective funding model for facilitating meaningful collaboration between academics, policymakers, and practitioners. Future funding schemes should aim to include opportunities to build strong collaborations, and researchers should integrate and explore adaptive, responsive models of cross-organisational research partnerships.

跨机构合作促进儿童健康饮食和积极生活:一个重要的反思
目的:批判性地反思由新南威尔士州(NSW)健康预防研究支持计划(PRSP)资助的以促进儿童健康饮食和积极生活为重点的大学研究人员、州政府资助的健康促进工作人员和政策制定者之间的合作研究伙伴关系。政府机构和学术机构经常各自为政,这给知识转化带来了挑战。研究需要时间才能到达从业人员手中,这阻碍了在公共卫生环境中采用循证干预措施。研究类型定性反思性评价。方法邀请PRSP资助的“EnHANCE”研究小组合作的30名关键利益相关者完成一项匿名在线调查。围绕吉布斯反思周期(1998)的六个主题构建了开放式问题,让参与者反思他们在2017年7月至2022年6月期间的合作经历。参与者包括卧龙岗大学的学者、博士候选人和新南威尔士州卫生工作人员(管理人员和健康促进官员)。数据分析使用演绎主题分析过程,系统地识别、分析和分组到主题中,以突出参与者所经历的挑战和成功。结果15名参与者回应。挑战包括COVID-19带来的干扰、应对管辖权多样性以及组织优先事项的初始不一致。取得了显著的成功,包括建立了强有力、公平的研究伙伴关系,在当地及时实施研究成果,加强了跨管辖区的学习,并随着关系的加强逐步使研究和促进健康的优先事项保持一致。这一合作取得成功的一个关键因素是连续几轮减贫战略文件供资,这些供资使伙伴关系有时间成熟并富有成效。减贫战略文件展示了一种有效的资助模式,可促进学术界、政策制定者和实践者之间有意义的合作。未来的资助计划应该包括建立强大合作的机会,科学家应该整合和探索跨组织研究伙伴关系的适应性、响应性模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信