Chuanyi Xiong, Huayu Liang, Yinwu Li and Zhuofeng Ke
{"title":"The critical role of boron hybridization (sp3vs. sp2vs. sp) in hydrogenation mechanisms by boron-based Ru catalysts†","authors":"Chuanyi Xiong, Huayu Liang, Yinwu Li and Zhuofeng Ke","doi":"10.1039/D5CY00380F","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Boron–transition metal (B–TM) catalysts have emerged as promising systems for hydrogenation reactions due to their unique bifunctional reactivity. However, the electronic structure–activity relationships of B–TM systems with different boron hybridizations remain poorly understood. This study systematically investigates how the sp<small><sup>3</sup></small>, sp<small><sup>2</sup></small>, and sp hybridizations influence the catalytic mechanisms of B–Ru complexes in hydrogen activation and ethylene hydrogenation. For hydrogen activation, the sp<small><sup>3</sup></small>-B–Ru system follows a hydride mechanism (Δ<em>G</em> = 31.2 kcal mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small>), while sp<small><sup>2</sup></small>/sp-B–Ru systems adopt a more efficient proton mechanism with lower barriers (15.3 and 20.8 kcal mol<small><sup>−1</sup></small>, respectively). Orbital analysis demonstrates that the Ru contribution to bridging hydrides increases progressively from sp<small><sup>3</sup></small> (9.4%) to sp (13.9%) systems, correlating with enhanced catalytic activity. For the hydrogenation reaction, the 2c–2e terminal is more favorable than the 3c–2e bridging hydrogen mechanism. Moreover, in the bridging hydrogen mechanism, the metal oxidation state remains unchanged for the sp<small><sup>2</sup></small> and the sp systems, which is superior to that for the sp<small><sup>3</sup></small> system. These findings provide molecular-level insights for the rational design of B–TM catalysts with improved hydrogenation performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":66,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Science & Technology","volume":" 13","pages":" 3906-3917"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cy/d5cy00380f","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Boron–transition metal (B–TM) catalysts have emerged as promising systems for hydrogenation reactions due to their unique bifunctional reactivity. However, the electronic structure–activity relationships of B–TM systems with different boron hybridizations remain poorly understood. This study systematically investigates how the sp3, sp2, and sp hybridizations influence the catalytic mechanisms of B–Ru complexes in hydrogen activation and ethylene hydrogenation. For hydrogen activation, the sp3-B–Ru system follows a hydride mechanism (ΔG = 31.2 kcal mol−1), while sp2/sp-B–Ru systems adopt a more efficient proton mechanism with lower barriers (15.3 and 20.8 kcal mol−1, respectively). Orbital analysis demonstrates that the Ru contribution to bridging hydrides increases progressively from sp3 (9.4%) to sp (13.9%) systems, correlating with enhanced catalytic activity. For the hydrogenation reaction, the 2c–2e terminal is more favorable than the 3c–2e bridging hydrogen mechanism. Moreover, in the bridging hydrogen mechanism, the metal oxidation state remains unchanged for the sp2 and the sp systems, which is superior to that for the sp3 system. These findings provide molecular-level insights for the rational design of B–TM catalysts with improved hydrogenation performance.
期刊介绍:
A multidisciplinary journal focusing on cutting edge research across all fundamental science and technological aspects of catalysis.
Editor-in-chief: Bert Weckhuysen
Impact factor: 5.0
Time to first decision (peer reviewed only): 31 days