Mohamed E. Osman , Anton S. Konopatsky , Nikita A. Repev , Dmitry V. Shtansky , Pavel A. Nikulshin , Victor M. Kogan
{"title":"Tuning ethanol synthesis pathways from syngas: nanosheet-structured K-doped Co–MoS2 catalysts and the role of CVD sulfidation†","authors":"Mohamed E. Osman , Anton S. Konopatsky , Nikita A. Repev , Dmitry V. Shtansky , Pavel A. Nikulshin , Victor M. Kogan","doi":"10.1039/d5cy00403a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates the effect of activation methods (H<sub>2</sub>S sulfidation <em>vs.</em> chemical vapor deposition, CVD) on the catalytic performance of K-doped (Co)–MoS<sub>2</sub> nanosheets supported on activated carbon (AJ-3) prepared from different Co-precursors (cobalt acetate <em>vs.</em> cobalt nitrate) for selective and non-selective ethanol synthesis from syngas. Advanced characterization techniques, including nitrogen sorption, XRF, SEM, SEM-EDX, STEM-EDX, STEM-HAADF, TEM, HRTEM, and XPS, were utilized to analyze the structural, compositional, and morphological properties of the synthesized catalysts. Notably, the K–(Co)MoS<sub>2</sub>/AJ-3 catalyst derived from cobalt nitrate <em>via</em> the CVD method exhibited exceptional ethanol selectivity, reaching 82%, significantly outperforming other alcohol products. In contrast, catalysts synthesized from cobalt acetate using the same CVD technique showed reduced activity for higher alcohol synthesis (HAS), favoring hydrocarbon formation and hydrogen spillover. Interestingly, the H<sub>2</sub>S sulfidation method applied to inorganic precursors resulted in unexpected methanol selectivity. This work highlights the critical role of precursor type and preparation methodology in tailoring catalytic performance, providing a comprehensive understanding of how these factors influence product selectivity and efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":66,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Science & Technology","volume":"15 13","pages":"Pages 3918-3939"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S2044475325002400","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of activation methods (H2S sulfidation vs. chemical vapor deposition, CVD) on the catalytic performance of K-doped (Co)–MoS2 nanosheets supported on activated carbon (AJ-3) prepared from different Co-precursors (cobalt acetate vs. cobalt nitrate) for selective and non-selective ethanol synthesis from syngas. Advanced characterization techniques, including nitrogen sorption, XRF, SEM, SEM-EDX, STEM-EDX, STEM-HAADF, TEM, HRTEM, and XPS, were utilized to analyze the structural, compositional, and morphological properties of the synthesized catalysts. Notably, the K–(Co)MoS2/AJ-3 catalyst derived from cobalt nitrate via the CVD method exhibited exceptional ethanol selectivity, reaching 82%, significantly outperforming other alcohol products. In contrast, catalysts synthesized from cobalt acetate using the same CVD technique showed reduced activity for higher alcohol synthesis (HAS), favoring hydrocarbon formation and hydrogen spillover. Interestingly, the H2S sulfidation method applied to inorganic precursors resulted in unexpected methanol selectivity. This work highlights the critical role of precursor type and preparation methodology in tailoring catalytic performance, providing a comprehensive understanding of how these factors influence product selectivity and efficiency.
期刊介绍:
A multidisciplinary journal focusing on cutting edge research across all fundamental science and technological aspects of catalysis.
Editor-in-chief: Bert Weckhuysen
Impact factor: 5.0
Time to first decision (peer reviewed only): 31 days