Socio-demographic determinants of flood risk perception disparities: A comparative study of subjective and objective risks in Nanjing, China

Peng Wang , Jianlei Zhang , Shengnan Yuan , Xizhen Wu , Jiawen Liu , Yuhu Zhang
{"title":"Socio-demographic determinants of flood risk perception disparities: A comparative study of subjective and objective risks in Nanjing, China","authors":"Peng Wang ,&nbsp;Jianlei Zhang ,&nbsp;Shengnan Yuan ,&nbsp;Xizhen Wu ,&nbsp;Jiawen Liu ,&nbsp;Yuhu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.wen.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global warming and urbanization worsen flood disasters, posing significant threats to human life and property. Both subjective and objective risk evaluations are of great significance in reducing the influence of calamities and devising comprehensive plans for risk governance. Although some studies have identified differences between subjective and objective risks, a detailed analysis of their underlying causes is lacking. These disparities in risk perception can lead to an uneven allocation of resources. Factors influencing risk perception directly or indirectly impact a region’s potential resilience and preparedness for disasters. Socio-demographic factors emerged as critical determinants of flood risk perception disparities. This study aims to integrate both risk assessments to explore the reasons behind these differences. Using six central districts in Nanjing as a case study, the research utilized SPSS and GIS for processing the assessments, and applied a comprehensive analysis method to probe into the elements that have an impact on how people perceive the risk of floods. The findings indicated that Jianye and Gulou districts had high objective risk but low subjective risk, while Qinhuai and Yuhuatai presented low objective risk but high subjective risk. Notably, socio-demographic variables such as gender, education, flood experience, and disaster education exhibited district-specific influences on risk perception, explaining the differences between subjective and objective risks. Additionally, the factors influencing how residents perceive flood risk varied across districts. These discoveries can assist governments in implementing targeted flood protection measures and developing comprehensive rescue strategies that address both physical vulnerabilities and psychological perceptions of risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101279,"journal":{"name":"Water-Energy Nexus","volume":"8 ","pages":"Pages 189-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Energy Nexus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588912525000141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global warming and urbanization worsen flood disasters, posing significant threats to human life and property. Both subjective and objective risk evaluations are of great significance in reducing the influence of calamities and devising comprehensive plans for risk governance. Although some studies have identified differences between subjective and objective risks, a detailed analysis of their underlying causes is lacking. These disparities in risk perception can lead to an uneven allocation of resources. Factors influencing risk perception directly or indirectly impact a region’s potential resilience and preparedness for disasters. Socio-demographic factors emerged as critical determinants of flood risk perception disparities. This study aims to integrate both risk assessments to explore the reasons behind these differences. Using six central districts in Nanjing as a case study, the research utilized SPSS and GIS for processing the assessments, and applied a comprehensive analysis method to probe into the elements that have an impact on how people perceive the risk of floods. The findings indicated that Jianye and Gulou districts had high objective risk but low subjective risk, while Qinhuai and Yuhuatai presented low objective risk but high subjective risk. Notably, socio-demographic variables such as gender, education, flood experience, and disaster education exhibited district-specific influences on risk perception, explaining the differences between subjective and objective risks. Additionally, the factors influencing how residents perceive flood risk varied across districts. These discoveries can assist governments in implementing targeted flood protection measures and developing comprehensive rescue strategies that address both physical vulnerabilities and psychological perceptions of risk.
洪水风险感知差异的社会人口因素:南京市主客观风险的比较研究
全球变暖和城市化加剧了洪涝灾害,给人类生命财产带来重大威胁。主观和客观的风险评价对于减少灾害的影响,制定综合的风险治理方案具有重要意义。虽然一些研究已经确定了主观和客观风险之间的差异,但缺乏对其根本原因的详细分析。这些风险认知上的差异可能导致资源分配的不平衡。影响风险认知的因素直接或间接地影响一个地区潜在的抗灾能力和备灾能力。社会人口因素成为洪水风险认知差异的关键决定因素。本研究旨在整合这两种风险评估,以探讨这些差异背后的原因。以南京市6个中心区为例,利用SPSS和GIS对评价结果进行处理,运用综合分析方法探讨影响人们对洪水风险认知的因素。结果表明:建邺区和鼓楼区客观风险高,主观风险低;秦淮区和雨花台区客观风险低,主观风险高;值得注意的是,性别、教育、洪水经历和灾害教育等社会人口变量对风险感知的影响表现出地区特异性,这解释了主观和客观风险之间的差异。此外,影响居民如何感知洪水风险的因素因地区而异。这些发现可以帮助政府实施有针对性的防洪措施,并制定全面的救援战略,解决物理脆弱性和心理风险感知问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信