P-205 A video-based system for extracting osmotic behavior and morphological dynamics: a foundation for predictive models in oocyte cryopreservation survival
A Antich, S Novo Bruña, S Rovira, F Moffa, M Antich
{"title":"P-205 A video-based system for extracting osmotic behavior and morphological dynamics: a foundation for predictive models in oocyte cryopreservation survival","authors":"A Antich, S Novo Bruña, S Rovira, F Moffa, M Antich","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf097.514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study question Can video-derived osmotic and morphological data during vitrification protocols serve as a foundation for future predictive models in oocyte cryopreservation survival? Summary answer Dynamic parameters such as dehydration velocity, circularity, and area changes provide a foundation for future predictive models in oocyte cryopreservation survival. What is known already Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in assisted reproduction laboratories, primarily through time-lapse microscopy of embryo culture or static image analysis. These AI models achieve high predictive accuracy by training on large datasets but function as “black boxes,” providing results without biological explanations. Unlike other medical AI applications, those in reproductive medicine lack mechanistic validation and rely on correlations rather than causal insights. Furthermore, European law (Article 22, GDPR) prohibits decisions affecting human lives from being based solely on AI predictions. This highlights the urgent need for biologically interpretable, validated models that integrate dynamic physiological data into AI-driven reproductive assessments. Study design, size, duration A prospective study (October 2023–January 2024) analyzed 37 oocytes from 10 donors. Immature oocytes discarded 4 hours post-retrieval were cultured for 24 hours to promote maturation. Oocytes were exposed to equilibration solution of the vitrification protocol (1/2 concentration for 3 min, then 2/3 for 3 min). Video recordings captured osmotic responses using an inverted microscope and micromanipulator. A holding pipette stabilized each oocyte, while a covering pipette facilitated media transitions for precise exposure. Participants/materials, setting, methods A custom software pipeline analyzed videos to extract area change, circularity, and roundness. Oocyte dehydration and deplasmolysis velocities were quantified, along with circularity and roundness differentials. Descriptive statistics assessed data distribution, Pearson correlations identified variable relationships, and stepwise regression determined key osmotic response predictors. The dataset was structured for machine learning applications, allowing AI-driven models to refine oocyte selection criteria and optimize cryopreservation strategies in assisted reproduction. Main results and the role of chance The analysis of osmotic and morphological parameters extracted from video recordings revealed significant variability in oocyte responses during vitrification. Descriptive statistics showed that the minimum area averaged 0.797±0.041%, while the difference in area was 20.26±4.12%, indicating substantial volume reduction during dehydration. The minimum circularity was 0.847±0.033, suggesting shape alterations under osmotic stress. Correlational analyses identified key relationships between parameters. Dehydration velocity during phase 1 showed strong positive correlations with phase 2 dehydration velocity (r = 0.79, p < 0.01) and moderate associations with deplasmolysis velocity in phase 1 (r = 0.69, p < 0.05), indicating consistency in osmotic responsiveness. Differences in circularity correlated with changes in area (r = 0.52, p < 0.05), highlighting shape recovery dynamics. Exploratory regression suggested that dehydration velocity, area change, and circularity alterations contribute significantly to osmotic adaptation, making them promising candidates for machine learning models. In contrast, deplasmolysis velocity in phase 2 and roundness variations showed weak or inconsistent correlations, suggesting limited predictive value. These findings support the hypothesis that dynamic osmotic behavior provides meaningful features for oocyte viability prediction. Further validation with survival outcomes and AI-based modeling is needed to confirm the predictive power of these variables. Limitations, reasons for caution Small sample size and pilot-level analyses limit the generalizability of findings. Additionally, data extraction using an inverted microscope with a micromanipulator is a tedious process. To improve usability, we are adapting the system for stereomicroscope use, ensuring seamless integration into routine vitrification protocols currently followed in IVF laboratories. Wider implications of the findings This study provides a biologically meaningful dataset for AI training, moving beyond static images to assess oocyte behavior. By integrating dynamic osmotic responses, AI models gain mechanistic insights, improving transparency and regulatory compliance. This aligns with European law (GDPR, Article 22), ensuring AI-assisted reproductive decisions remain interpretable and evidence-based. Trial registration number Yes","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"644 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf097.514","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study question Can video-derived osmotic and morphological data during vitrification protocols serve as a foundation for future predictive models in oocyte cryopreservation survival? Summary answer Dynamic parameters such as dehydration velocity, circularity, and area changes provide a foundation for future predictive models in oocyte cryopreservation survival. What is known already Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in assisted reproduction laboratories, primarily through time-lapse microscopy of embryo culture or static image analysis. These AI models achieve high predictive accuracy by training on large datasets but function as “black boxes,” providing results without biological explanations. Unlike other medical AI applications, those in reproductive medicine lack mechanistic validation and rely on correlations rather than causal insights. Furthermore, European law (Article 22, GDPR) prohibits decisions affecting human lives from being based solely on AI predictions. This highlights the urgent need for biologically interpretable, validated models that integrate dynamic physiological data into AI-driven reproductive assessments. Study design, size, duration A prospective study (October 2023–January 2024) analyzed 37 oocytes from 10 donors. Immature oocytes discarded 4 hours post-retrieval were cultured for 24 hours to promote maturation. Oocytes were exposed to equilibration solution of the vitrification protocol (1/2 concentration for 3 min, then 2/3 for 3 min). Video recordings captured osmotic responses using an inverted microscope and micromanipulator. A holding pipette stabilized each oocyte, while a covering pipette facilitated media transitions for precise exposure. Participants/materials, setting, methods A custom software pipeline analyzed videos to extract area change, circularity, and roundness. Oocyte dehydration and deplasmolysis velocities were quantified, along with circularity and roundness differentials. Descriptive statistics assessed data distribution, Pearson correlations identified variable relationships, and stepwise regression determined key osmotic response predictors. The dataset was structured for machine learning applications, allowing AI-driven models to refine oocyte selection criteria and optimize cryopreservation strategies in assisted reproduction. Main results and the role of chance The analysis of osmotic and morphological parameters extracted from video recordings revealed significant variability in oocyte responses during vitrification. Descriptive statistics showed that the minimum area averaged 0.797±0.041%, while the difference in area was 20.26±4.12%, indicating substantial volume reduction during dehydration. The minimum circularity was 0.847±0.033, suggesting shape alterations under osmotic stress. Correlational analyses identified key relationships between parameters. Dehydration velocity during phase 1 showed strong positive correlations with phase 2 dehydration velocity (r = 0.79, p < 0.01) and moderate associations with deplasmolysis velocity in phase 1 (r = 0.69, p < 0.05), indicating consistency in osmotic responsiveness. Differences in circularity correlated with changes in area (r = 0.52, p < 0.05), highlighting shape recovery dynamics. Exploratory regression suggested that dehydration velocity, area change, and circularity alterations contribute significantly to osmotic adaptation, making them promising candidates for machine learning models. In contrast, deplasmolysis velocity in phase 2 and roundness variations showed weak or inconsistent correlations, suggesting limited predictive value. These findings support the hypothesis that dynamic osmotic behavior provides meaningful features for oocyte viability prediction. Further validation with survival outcomes and AI-based modeling is needed to confirm the predictive power of these variables. Limitations, reasons for caution Small sample size and pilot-level analyses limit the generalizability of findings. Additionally, data extraction using an inverted microscope with a micromanipulator is a tedious process. To improve usability, we are adapting the system for stereomicroscope use, ensuring seamless integration into routine vitrification protocols currently followed in IVF laboratories. Wider implications of the findings This study provides a biologically meaningful dataset for AI training, moving beyond static images to assess oocyte behavior. By integrating dynamic osmotic responses, AI models gain mechanistic insights, improving transparency and regulatory compliance. This aligns with European law (GDPR, Article 22), ensuring AI-assisted reproductive decisions remain interpretable and evidence-based. Trial registration number Yes
研究问题:玻璃化过程中视频衍生的渗透和形态学数据能否作为未来卵母细胞低温保存存活预测模型的基础?脱水速度、圆度和面积变化等动态参数为未来卵母细胞低温保存存活预测模型提供了基础。人工智能(AI)越来越多地用于辅助生殖实验室,主要是通过胚胎培养的延时显微镜或静态图像分析。这些人工智能模型通过在大型数据集上进行训练,实现了很高的预测准确性,但却起到了“黑匣子”的作用,提供的结果没有生物学上的解释。与其他医疗人工智能应用不同,生殖医学领域的人工智能应用缺乏机制验证,依赖于相关性而不是因果关系。此外,欧洲法律(GDPR第22条)禁止仅基于人工智能预测做出影响人类生活的决定。这凸显了迫切需要生物学上可解释的、经过验证的模型,将动态生理数据整合到人工智能驱动的生殖评估中。一项前瞻性研究(2023年10月- 2024年1月)分析了来自10名捐赠者的37个卵母细胞。取卵后4小时丢弃的未成熟卵母细胞培养24小时以促进成熟。将卵母细胞暴露在玻璃化方案的平衡液中(1/2浓度3min,然后2/3浓度3min)。视频记录使用倒置显微镜和显微操作器捕捉渗透反应。一个保持移液管稳定每个卵母细胞,而一个覆盖移液管促进介质过渡,以精确暴露。参与者/材料,设置,方法一个定制的软件流水线分析视频,提取面积变化,圆度和圆度。测定卵母细胞脱水和去质解速度,以及圆度和圆度差异。描述性统计评估数据分布,Pearson相关性确定变量关系,逐步回归确定关键渗透反应预测因子。该数据集是为机器学习应用而构建的,允许人工智能驱动的模型改进卵母细胞选择标准并优化辅助生殖中的冷冻保存策略。从录像中提取的渗透和形态参数分析显示,在玻璃化过程中,卵母细胞的反应具有显著的可变性。描述性统计显示,最小面积平均值为0.797±0.041%,而面积差异为20.26±4.12%,表明脱水过程中体积大幅减少。最小圆度为0.847±0.033,表明在渗透胁迫下形状发生了变化。相关分析确定了参数之间的关键关系。第一阶段脱水速度与第二阶段脱水速度呈显著正相关(r = 0.79, p <;0.01),且与第1期去质解速度有中等相关性(r = 0.69, p <;0.05),表明渗透反应的一致性。圆度差异与面积变化相关(r = 0.52, p <;0.05),突出形状恢复动态。探索性回归表明,脱水速度、面积变化和圆度变化对渗透适应有显著贡献,使它们成为机器学习模型的有希望的候选者。相比之下,第2阶段的去质解速度与圆度变化的相关性较弱或不一致,表明预测价值有限。这些发现支持了动态渗透行为为卵母细胞活力预测提供有意义特征的假设。需要对生存结果和基于人工智能的建模进行进一步验证,以确认这些变量的预测能力。局限性,谨慎的原因小样本量和试点水平的分析限制了研究结果的普遍性。此外,使用带有微操作器的倒置显微镜提取数据是一个繁琐的过程。为了提高可用性,我们正在调整系统用于立体显微镜使用,确保无缝集成到常规玻璃化协议目前在试管婴儿实验室遵循。这项研究为人工智能训练提供了一个具有生物学意义的数据集,超越了静态图像来评估卵母细胞的行为。通过整合动态渗透反应,人工智能模型获得了机制洞察力,提高了透明度和法规遵从性。这符合欧洲法律(GDPR第22条),确保人工智能辅助生殖决策保持可解释性和循证性。试验注册号是
期刊介绍:
Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues.
Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.