P-430 The impact of age on reproductive outcomes of euploid embryos: gamete provider age is irrelevant, but woman’s age at transfer significantly reduces success rates

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
L Martiñá Rivas, A Rodríguez Isern, D Company Regàs, P Andrade, S Rovira Fontanals, F Moffa, M Antich Díaz, S Novo Bruña
{"title":"P-430 The impact of age on reproductive outcomes of euploid embryos: gamete provider age is irrelevant, but woman’s age at transfer significantly reduces success rates","authors":"L Martiñá Rivas, A Rodríguez Isern, D Company Regàs, P Andrade, S Rovira Fontanals, F Moffa, M Antich Díaz, S Novo Bruña","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf097.736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study question Do the ages of the providers of the gametes or the woman’s age at transfer influence reproductive outcomes in single euploid blastocyst transfers? Summary answer Woman’s age at transfer significantly reduces pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (p < 0.05), while the age of gamete providers has no significant impact What is known already Reproductive success in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) depends on gamete and embryo quality, and uterine receptivity. While advanced maternal age is associated with reduced outcomes, the extent to which this is driven by gamete age or uterine factors remains unclear. Euploid embryos offer a unique opportunity to isolate these effects, as they remove the confounding influence of chromosomal aneuploidy, a known contributor to failed implantation and live birth. However, evidence regarding the relative impact of gamete and recipient age on the success of euploid embryo transfers is still limited, necessitating further investigation. Study design, size, duration This retrospective cohort study analyzed 757 single euploid blastocyst transfers from February-2019 to February-2024. Given that the focus of the study is on the age of the gamete provider and woman’s age at transfer, IVF cycles using both autologous and donor gametes were included. After blastocyst biopsy, PGT-A was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). PGT-A was indicated for advanced maternal age or to reduce time-to-pregnancy. Participants/materials, setting, methods Data were stratified by oocyte provider age (<35, 35–37, 38–40, >40 years), sperm provider age (≤40, >40), and woman’s age at transfer (<38, 38–42, 43–45, >45 years). Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were compared. For gamete age groups, the impact on post-vitrification survival of biopsied blastocysts was analyzed. Significant results included embryo quality comparisons using the proportion of blastocysts ≥3BB transferred. Chi-square tests with p-value <0.05 were considered significant. Main results and the role of chance The age of the gamete providers did not impact the survival of vitrified biopsied blastocysts, with survival rates consistently around 98% across all age groups (oocyte: p = 0.499; sperm: p = 0.419). Oocyte provider age (<35, 35–37, 38–40, >40 years) showed no significant effect on pregnancy (69.2%, 76.1%, 67.4%, 69.4%; p = 0.634), clinical pregnancy (61.1%, 69.0%, 62.0%, 59.2%; p = 0.615), or live birth rates (53.4%, 59.2%, 49.6%, 57.1%; p = 0.581). Similarly, sperm provider age (≤40, >40 years) did not influence pregnancy (68.9%, 70.6%; p = 0.249), clinical pregnancy (60.6%, 63.7%; p = 0.726), or live birth rates (53.3%, 53.9%; p = 0.871). In contrast, woman’s age at transfer (<38, 38–42, 43–45, >45 years) significantly impacted the success of euploid embryo transfers. Pregnancy rates decreased with age statistically significant (71.7%, 73.6, 67.5%, 59.5%; p < 0.05). Clinical pregnancy (64.2%, 67.3%, 57.2%, 52.3%; p < 0.05) and live birth rates (57.1%, 58.7%, 50.0%, 40.5%; p < 0.05) also showed a clear age-related decline. Embryo quality was excluded as a factor, as the proportion of high-quality blastocysts (≥3BB) was equivalent across groups (<38: 95.4%, 38–42: 93.1%, 43–45: 96.4%, >45: 92.0%; p = 0.277). These findings emphasize the uterine environment as the primary determinant of live birth success in euploid embryo transfers. Limitations, reasons for caution While this study provides valuable insights, its retrospective design may limit the ability to control all potential confounders. Further prospective studies could help validate these findings and explore additional factors influencing euploid embryo reproductive outcomes. Wider implications of the findings These findings confirm that gamete provider’s age does not significantly affect live birth outcomes when transferring single euploid embryos. Improving uterine receptivity and optimizing obstetrical care in older women may enhance ART success rates. Trial registration number No","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"149 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf097.736","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question Do the ages of the providers of the gametes or the woman’s age at transfer influence reproductive outcomes in single euploid blastocyst transfers? Summary answer Woman’s age at transfer significantly reduces pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (p < 0.05), while the age of gamete providers has no significant impact What is known already Reproductive success in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) depends on gamete and embryo quality, and uterine receptivity. While advanced maternal age is associated with reduced outcomes, the extent to which this is driven by gamete age or uterine factors remains unclear. Euploid embryos offer a unique opportunity to isolate these effects, as they remove the confounding influence of chromosomal aneuploidy, a known contributor to failed implantation and live birth. However, evidence regarding the relative impact of gamete and recipient age on the success of euploid embryo transfers is still limited, necessitating further investigation. Study design, size, duration This retrospective cohort study analyzed 757 single euploid blastocyst transfers from February-2019 to February-2024. Given that the focus of the study is on the age of the gamete provider and woman’s age at transfer, IVF cycles using both autologous and donor gametes were included. After blastocyst biopsy, PGT-A was performed using next-generation sequencing (NGS). PGT-A was indicated for advanced maternal age or to reduce time-to-pregnancy. Participants/materials, setting, methods Data were stratified by oocyte provider age (<35, 35–37, 38–40, >40 years), sperm provider age (≤40, >40), and woman’s age at transfer (<38, 38–42, 43–45, >45 years). Pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were compared. For gamete age groups, the impact on post-vitrification survival of biopsied blastocysts was analyzed. Significant results included embryo quality comparisons using the proportion of blastocysts ≥3BB transferred. Chi-square tests with p-value <0.05 were considered significant. Main results and the role of chance The age of the gamete providers did not impact the survival of vitrified biopsied blastocysts, with survival rates consistently around 98% across all age groups (oocyte: p = 0.499; sperm: p = 0.419). Oocyte provider age (<35, 35–37, 38–40, >40 years) showed no significant effect on pregnancy (69.2%, 76.1%, 67.4%, 69.4%; p = 0.634), clinical pregnancy (61.1%, 69.0%, 62.0%, 59.2%; p = 0.615), or live birth rates (53.4%, 59.2%, 49.6%, 57.1%; p = 0.581). Similarly, sperm provider age (≤40, >40 years) did not influence pregnancy (68.9%, 70.6%; p = 0.249), clinical pregnancy (60.6%, 63.7%; p = 0.726), or live birth rates (53.3%, 53.9%; p = 0.871). In contrast, woman’s age at transfer (<38, 38–42, 43–45, >45 years) significantly impacted the success of euploid embryo transfers. Pregnancy rates decreased with age statistically significant (71.7%, 73.6, 67.5%, 59.5%; p < 0.05). Clinical pregnancy (64.2%, 67.3%, 57.2%, 52.3%; p < 0.05) and live birth rates (57.1%, 58.7%, 50.0%, 40.5%; p < 0.05) also showed a clear age-related decline. Embryo quality was excluded as a factor, as the proportion of high-quality blastocysts (≥3BB) was equivalent across groups (<38: 95.4%, 38–42: 93.1%, 43–45: 96.4%, >45: 92.0%; p = 0.277). These findings emphasize the uterine environment as the primary determinant of live birth success in euploid embryo transfers. Limitations, reasons for caution While this study provides valuable insights, its retrospective design may limit the ability to control all potential confounders. Further prospective studies could help validate these findings and explore additional factors influencing euploid embryo reproductive outcomes. Wider implications of the findings These findings confirm that gamete provider’s age does not significantly affect live birth outcomes when transferring single euploid embryos. Improving uterine receptivity and optimizing obstetrical care in older women may enhance ART success rates. Trial registration number No
P-430年龄对整倍体胚胎生殖结果的影响:配子提供者年龄无关,但女性移植时的年龄显著降低了成功率
研究问题配子提供者的年龄或移植时女性的年龄是否会影响单个整倍体囊胚移植的生殖结果?女性转移年龄显著降低妊娠、临床妊娠和活产率(p <;在辅助生殖技术(ART)中,生殖成功率取决于配子和胚胎的质量以及子宫的接受性。虽然高龄产妇与预后降低有关,但配子年龄或子宫因素在多大程度上驱动了这一点尚不清楚。整倍体胚胎提供了一个独特的机会来分离这些影响,因为它们消除了染色体非整倍体的混杂影响,染色体非整倍体是导致着床失败和活产的已知因素。然而,关于配子和受体年龄对整倍体胚胎移植成功的相对影响的证据仍然有限,需要进一步研究。本回顾性队列研究分析了2019年2月至2024年2月期间757例单整倍体囊胚移植。考虑到研究的重点是配子提供者的年龄和女性在移植时的年龄,使用自体配子和供体配子的体外受精周期都包括在内。囊胚活检后,使用下一代测序(NGS)进行PGT-A检测。PGT-A适用于高龄产妇或缩短妊娠时间。参与者/材料、环境、方法按卵母细胞供体年龄(35岁、35 - 37岁、38 - 40岁、40岁)、精子供体年龄(≤40岁、40岁)和女性移植年龄(38岁、38 - 42岁、43-45岁、45岁)进行分层。比较妊娠率、临床妊娠率、流产率和活产率。对于配子年龄组,对玻璃化后活检囊胚存活的影响进行了分析。采用≥3BB囊胚移植比例进行胚胎质量比较,结果具有显著性。p值为&;lt;0.05的卡方检验认为显著。配子提供者的年龄对玻璃化活检囊胚的存活率没有影响,所有年龄组的囊胚存活率都在98%左右(卵母细胞:p = 0.499;精子:p = 0.419)。卵母细胞供体年龄(35岁、35 - 37岁、38-40岁、40岁)对妊娠无显著影响(69.2%、76.1%、67.4%、69.4%;P = 0.634),临床妊娠(61.1%,69.0%,62.0%,59.2%;P = 0.615)或活产率(53.4%,59.2%,49.6%,57.1%;P = 0.581)。同样,精子提供者年龄(≤40岁,40岁)不影响妊娠(68.9%,70.6%;P = 0.249),临床妊娠(60.6%,63.7%;P = 0.726)或活产率(53.3%,53.9%;P = 0.871)。相比之下,移植时女性的年龄(38岁、38 - 42岁、43-45岁、45岁)显著影响整倍体胚胎移植的成功。妊娠率随年龄下降有统计学意义(71.7%、73.6%、67.5%、59.5%;p, lt;0.05)。临床妊娠(64.2%、67.3%、57.2%、52.3%;p, lt;0.05),活产率(57.1%,58.7%,50.0%,40.5%;p, lt;0.05)也显示出明显的年龄相关性下降。由于各组高质量囊胚(≥3BB)的比例相当(<38: 95.4%, 38 - 42: 93.1%, 43-45: 96.4%, >45: 92.0%;P = 0.277)。这些发现强调子宫环境是整倍体胚胎移植中活产成功的主要决定因素。虽然这项研究提供了有价值的见解,但其回顾性设计可能限制了控制所有潜在混杂因素的能力。进一步的前瞻性研究可以帮助验证这些发现,并探索影响整倍体胚胎生殖结果的其他因素。这些发现证实,当移植单个整倍体胚胎时,配子提供者的年龄对活产结果没有显著影响。改善高龄妇女子宫容受性和优化产科护理可提高ART成功率。试验注册号
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信