Evaluation of a primary care-based Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) program in a fully-integrated federally qualified health center

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Karen Howard , Pamela Stover , Andrew Suchocki
{"title":"Evaluation of a primary care-based Medication for Opioid Use Disorder (MOUD) program in a fully-integrated federally qualified health center","authors":"Karen Howard ,&nbsp;Pamela Stover ,&nbsp;Andrew Suchocki","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Clackamas Health Centers (CHC), a public sector Federally Qualified Health Center in Oregon, has been providing medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in a low-barrier, harm reduction model for over a decade. CHC also provides a unique pathway for criminal justice-involved patients to receive MOUD treatment. CHC's primary care-based treatment program has seen substantial growth since it began; however, a comprehensive review has never been completed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed-methodology program evaluation was undertaken to determine if the CHC MOUD program is providing effective low-barrier care. Outcomes for this evaluation included retention rate, opioid-free urine drug screen (UDS) results, patient and provider satisfaction, and patient improvement in quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Data collected from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 showed a 6-month retention rate of 85 % (<em>N</em> = 186). Urine drug screens were opioid-negative for 91 % of samples examined (<em>N</em> = 222). Patients reported positive lifestyle changes after receiving MOUD treatment, demonstrated by Treatment Effectiveness Assessment scores. Medical providers surveyed (<em>N</em> = 9) felt satisfied in their work treating patients with opioid use disorder and patients (<em>N</em> = 24) reported satisfaction with the care they were receiving in the MOUD program.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While data on primary care-based MOUD models is sparse, this evaluation has shown similar or better results than those noted in other studies on outcomes such as retention and urine drug screen results. These data can help demonstrate the effectiveness of fully-integrated MOUD programs in primary care, as well as establishing a baseline for treatment outcomes and future program evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 209744"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Clackamas Health Centers (CHC), a public sector Federally Qualified Health Center in Oregon, has been providing medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) in a low-barrier, harm reduction model for over a decade. CHC also provides a unique pathway for criminal justice-involved patients to receive MOUD treatment. CHC's primary care-based treatment program has seen substantial growth since it began; however, a comprehensive review has never been completed.

Methods

A mixed-methodology program evaluation was undertaken to determine if the CHC MOUD program is providing effective low-barrier care. Outcomes for this evaluation included retention rate, opioid-free urine drug screen (UDS) results, patient and provider satisfaction, and patient improvement in quality of life.

Results

Data collected from July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 showed a 6-month retention rate of 85 % (N = 186). Urine drug screens were opioid-negative for 91 % of samples examined (N = 222). Patients reported positive lifestyle changes after receiving MOUD treatment, demonstrated by Treatment Effectiveness Assessment scores. Medical providers surveyed (N = 9) felt satisfied in their work treating patients with opioid use disorder and patients (N = 24) reported satisfaction with the care they were receiving in the MOUD program.

Conclusion

While data on primary care-based MOUD models is sparse, this evaluation has shown similar or better results than those noted in other studies on outcomes such as retention and urine drug screen results. These data can help demonstrate the effectiveness of fully-integrated MOUD programs in primary care, as well as establishing a baseline for treatment outcomes and future program evaluation.

Abstract Image

在一个完全整合的联邦合格的健康中心评估基于初级保健的阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)计划。
Clackamas卫生中心(CHC)是俄勒冈州的一家公共部门联邦合格卫生中心,十多年来一直以低障碍、减少危害的模式为阿片类药物使用障碍(mod)提供药物治疗。CHC还为涉及刑事司法的患者提供了接受mod治疗的独特途径。CHC的初级保健治疗项目自启动以来取得了显著增长;然而,全面审查从未完成。方法:采用混合方法学方案评估,以确定CHC mod方案是否提供有效的低障碍护理。评估结果包括留置率、无阿片类药物尿药筛查(UDS)结果、患者和提供者满意度以及患者生活质量的改善。结果:从2022年7月1日至2022年12月31日收集的数据显示,6个月保留率为85 % (N = 186)。91% %的尿检样本(N = 222)的尿检药物筛查为阿片类药物阴性。患者在接受mod治疗后报告了积极的生活方式改变,治疗效果评估评分证明了这一点。接受调查的医疗服务提供者(N = 9)对他们治疗阿片类药物使用障碍患者的工作感到满意,患者(N = 24)报告对他们在mod计划中接受的护理感到满意。结论:虽然基于初级保健的mod模型的数据很少,但该评估显示的结果与其他关于结果(如潴留和尿液药物筛查结果)的研究相似或更好。这些数据可以帮助证明完全整合的mod项目在初级保健中的有效性,并为治疗结果和未来的项目评估建立基线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信