“All it's gonna tell you is if it has fentanyl or not:” Perceptions of fentanyl and drug checking among first responders and people who use drugs

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Brenda Y. Goh , Emily C. Williams , Courteney Wettemann , Callan E. Fockele , Tessa Frohe , Grover Williams , Nathan Holland , Rachel E. Rourke , Robert Pitcher , Thea Oliphant-Wells , Jenna van Draanen
{"title":"“All it's gonna tell you is if it has fentanyl or not:” Perceptions of fentanyl and drug checking among first responders and people who use drugs","authors":"Brenda Y. Goh ,&nbsp;Emily C. Williams ,&nbsp;Courteney Wettemann ,&nbsp;Callan E. Fockele ,&nbsp;Tessa Frohe ,&nbsp;Grover Williams ,&nbsp;Nathan Holland ,&nbsp;Rachel E. Rourke ,&nbsp;Robert Pitcher ,&nbsp;Thea Oliphant-Wells ,&nbsp;Jenna van Draanen","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Fentanyl contamination in the unregulated drug supply contributes to high rates of opioid overdose among people who use drugs (PWUD). Drug checking is a harm reduction strategy that provides PWUD with information about the contents of their substances. Although drug checking has broad utility, this study focused specifically on drug checking to test for fentanyl, with a particular emphasis on fentanyl test strips (FTS) and point-of-care testing at community service organizations. This study assessed first responders and PWUDs' perceptions of fentanyl, drug checking, and associated implementation suggestions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The risk environment framework and community-engaged methods guided the study. First responders and PWUD were recruited using convenience sampling from first responder agencies and community service locations, respectively, in King County, WA. The study conducted semi-structured interviews with first responders (<em>n</em> = 32; law enforcement officers, paramedics, emergency medical services, firefighters, etc.) and PWUD (<em>n</em> = 13) until data saturation. A group of academically trained and peer-based researchers with lived experiences of substance use analyzed the data using a thematic analysis approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>First responders and PWUD discussed the fentanyl-saturated drug use landscape and the amplification of PWUDs' overdose risk. Preferences for fentanyl among PWUD varied, ranging from a preference for it, to willingness to use it, to strong aversion. Most first responders expressed concerns about post-overdose FTS distribution, viewing it as ineffective in promoting safer use behaviors and inconsistent with their workflow and provider role. People who use fentanyl perceived drug checking to be of low relevance due to fentanyl's ubiquity, while PWUD who were trying to avoid it cited numerous barriers, including low availability, trust in sellers, limitations of FTS, and lack of information or connections.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study found low support for drug checking for fentanyl and first responders' distribution of FTS. Drug checking may have the most utility for PWUD who were trying to avoid fentanyl; however, its potential benefits may not be fully realized until structural barriers to access and use are addressed. Caution should be exercised to not promote drug checking as a universal tool and place the onus of addressing fentanyl contamination on PWUD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 209747"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925001262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Fentanyl contamination in the unregulated drug supply contributes to high rates of opioid overdose among people who use drugs (PWUD). Drug checking is a harm reduction strategy that provides PWUD with information about the contents of their substances. Although drug checking has broad utility, this study focused specifically on drug checking to test for fentanyl, with a particular emphasis on fentanyl test strips (FTS) and point-of-care testing at community service organizations. This study assessed first responders and PWUDs' perceptions of fentanyl, drug checking, and associated implementation suggestions.

Methods

The risk environment framework and community-engaged methods guided the study. First responders and PWUD were recruited using convenience sampling from first responder agencies and community service locations, respectively, in King County, WA. The study conducted semi-structured interviews with first responders (n = 32; law enforcement officers, paramedics, emergency medical services, firefighters, etc.) and PWUD (n = 13) until data saturation. A group of academically trained and peer-based researchers with lived experiences of substance use analyzed the data using a thematic analysis approach.

Results

First responders and PWUD discussed the fentanyl-saturated drug use landscape and the amplification of PWUDs' overdose risk. Preferences for fentanyl among PWUD varied, ranging from a preference for it, to willingness to use it, to strong aversion. Most first responders expressed concerns about post-overdose FTS distribution, viewing it as ineffective in promoting safer use behaviors and inconsistent with their workflow and provider role. People who use fentanyl perceived drug checking to be of low relevance due to fentanyl's ubiquity, while PWUD who were trying to avoid it cited numerous barriers, including low availability, trust in sellers, limitations of FTS, and lack of information or connections.

Conclusions

The study found low support for drug checking for fentanyl and first responders' distribution of FTS. Drug checking may have the most utility for PWUD who were trying to avoid fentanyl; however, its potential benefits may not be fully realized until structural barriers to access and use are addressed. Caution should be exercised to not promote drug checking as a universal tool and place the onus of addressing fentanyl contamination on PWUD.
“它能告诉你的只是它是否含有芬太尼:”急救人员和吸毒者对芬太尼和药物检查的看法。
不受管制的药物供应中的芬太尼污染导致吸毒者中阿片类药物过量的高比例(PWUD)。药物检查是一种减少危害的策略,为PWUD提供有关其物质含量的信息。虽然药物检查具有广泛的用途,但本研究特别关注芬太尼的药物检查测试,特别强调芬太尼试纸(FTS)和社区服务组织的护理点测试。本研究评估了第一响应者和pwud对芬太尼的认知、药物检查以及相关的实施建议。方法:采用风险环境框架和社区参与方法。第一响应者和PWUD分别从华盛顿金县的第一响应者机构和社区服务地点使用方便抽样招募。该研究对急救人员进行了半结构化访谈(n = 32;执法人员、护理人员、紧急医疗服务人员、消防员等)和PWUD (n = 13),直到数据饱和。一组受过学术训练、有药物使用生活经验的同行研究人员使用专题分析方法分析了数据。结果:第一响应者和PWUD讨论了芬太尼饱和的用药情况和PWUD过量用药风险的放大。PWUD对芬太尼的偏好各不相同,从喜欢它,到愿意使用它,再到强烈厌恶。大多数急救人员对过量用药后FTS的分布表示担忧,认为这对促进更安全的使用行为无效,与他们的工作流程和提供者角色不一致。由于芬太尼无处不在,使用芬太尼的人认为药物检查不太重要,而试图避免使用芬太尼的PWUD则指出了许多障碍,包括低可用性、对卖家的信任、FTS的限制以及缺乏信息或联系。结论:本研究发现芬太尼药物检查和急救人员FTS分布的支持度较低。药物检查可能对试图避免芬太尼的PWUD最有用;然而,在解决获取和使用的结构性障碍之前,其潜在效益可能无法充分实现。应谨慎行事,不要将药物检查作为一种通用工具,而将解决芬太尼污染的责任放在PWUD上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信