Yi-Fu Li, Yu Chen, Hui Cheng, Jia-Yi Shen, Bo-Wen Shen, Hao-Xiang Long, Xue-Song Sun, Jie Chen, Jing-Yun Peng, Pan Wang, Shan-Shan Guo, Qiu-Yan Chen, Lin-Quan Tang, Hai-Qiang Mai, Li-Ting Liu
{"title":"Anti-PD-1 antibody with or without capecitabine as maintenance therapy after first-line therapy of recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.","authors":"Yi-Fu Li, Yu Chen, Hui Cheng, Jia-Yi Shen, Bo-Wen Shen, Hao-Xiang Long, Xue-Song Sun, Jie Chen, Jing-Yun Peng, Pan Wang, Shan-Shan Guo, Qiu-Yan Chen, Lin-Quan Tang, Hai-Qiang Mai, Li-Ting Liu","doi":"10.1093/oncolo/oyaf188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of maintenance therapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) following first-line treatment with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and anti-PD-1 antibody remains controversial. Therefore, an effective and low-toxicity maintenance treatment option is urgently needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 301 patients who received either combined maintenance therapy (anti-PD-1 antibody plus capecitabine) or anti-PD-1 antibody alone. Patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome, and its association with maintenance therapy was assessed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight patients were included in the combined maintenance therapy group. After PSM, 174 patients were included in the anti-PD-1 antibody maintenance therapy group. In the matched cohort, the 2-year PFS rate was significantly higher in the combined maintenance therapy group than in the anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy group (66.8% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.0063). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with pre-treatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA >12,400 copies/mL and undetectable post-treatment levels had significant improved PFS with combined maintenance therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20-0.96, P = 0.033). In contrast, no statistically significant PFS improvement from the combined maintenance therapy was observed among patients with low pre-treatment EBV DNA (≤12,400 copies/mL) and undetectable post-treatment levels (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.27-1.27, P = 0.17), or those with detectable post-treatment EBV DNA levels regardless of pre-treatment levels (HR = 0.73, 95% = CI 0.31-1.70, P = 0.46). Combined maintenance therapy was associated with higher rates of grade 3-4 hand-foot syndrome (P < 0.001) and leukopenia (P = 0.0487).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-PD-1 antibody plus capecitabine maintenance therapy improved PFS with manageable toxicities in patients with RM-MPC following first-line immunochemotherapy, particularly in those with pre-treatment EBV DNA > 12,400 copies/mL and undetectable post-treatment levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":54686,"journal":{"name":"Oncologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyaf188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The use of maintenance therapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC) following first-line treatment with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and anti-PD-1 antibody remains controversial. Therefore, an effective and low-toxicity maintenance treatment option is urgently needed.
Methods: This retrospective study included 301 patients who received either combined maintenance therapy (anti-PD-1 antibody plus capecitabine) or anti-PD-1 antibody alone. Patients were matched in a 1:3 ratio using propensity score matching (PSM). Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome, and its association with maintenance therapy was assessed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model.
Results: Fifty-eight patients were included in the combined maintenance therapy group. After PSM, 174 patients were included in the anti-PD-1 antibody maintenance therapy group. In the matched cohort, the 2-year PFS rate was significantly higher in the combined maintenance therapy group than in the anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy group (66.8% vs. 51.3%, P = 0.0063). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with pre-treatment Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA >12,400 copies/mL and undetectable post-treatment levels had significant improved PFS with combined maintenance therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.20-0.96, P = 0.033). In contrast, no statistically significant PFS improvement from the combined maintenance therapy was observed among patients with low pre-treatment EBV DNA (≤12,400 copies/mL) and undetectable post-treatment levels (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.27-1.27, P = 0.17), or those with detectable post-treatment EBV DNA levels regardless of pre-treatment levels (HR = 0.73, 95% = CI 0.31-1.70, P = 0.46). Combined maintenance therapy was associated with higher rates of grade 3-4 hand-foot syndrome (P < 0.001) and leukopenia (P = 0.0487).
Conclusion: Anti-PD-1 antibody plus capecitabine maintenance therapy improved PFS with manageable toxicities in patients with RM-MPC following first-line immunochemotherapy, particularly in those with pre-treatment EBV DNA > 12,400 copies/mL and undetectable post-treatment levels.
期刊介绍:
The Oncologist® is dedicated to translating the latest research developments into the best multidimensional care for cancer patients. Thus, The Oncologist is committed to helping physicians excel in this ever-expanding environment through the publication of timely reviews, original studies, and commentaries on important developments. We believe that the practice of oncology requires both an understanding of a range of disciplines encompassing basic science related to cancer, translational research, and clinical practice, but also the socioeconomic and psychosocial factors that determine access to care and quality of life and function following cancer treatment.