Factors Associated with Documenting Social Determinants of Health in Electronic Health Records.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jeongyoung Park, Yalda Jabbarpour, Robert L Phillips, Andrew W Bazemore, Nathaniel Hendrix
{"title":"Factors Associated with Documenting Social Determinants of Health in Electronic Health Records.","authors":"Jeongyoung Park, Yalda Jabbarpour, Robert L Phillips, Andrew W Bazemore, Nathaniel Hendrix","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2024.240279R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social determinants of health (SDOH) significantly impact health outcomes, yet their integration into clinical decision making is inconsistent. We examined how family physicians document SDOH in electronic health records (EHRs) and identified factors influencing this practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2,089 family physicians completing the 2022 American Board of Family Medicine Continuous Certification Questionnaire. The outcome was physicians' self-reported SDOH documentation by checking a box within the EHR, writing it in a note, or entering it as a diagnosis. Physician, practice, and community characteristics associated with SDOH documentation were assessed, using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 61% of family physicians documented SDOH in notes, with fewer using checkboxes (46%) or diagnosis codes (35%). Across models, factors persistently positively associated with documenting SDOH included participating in value-based programs, having more resources for social needs, collaborating with neighborhood organizations, and working in a more disadvantaged area (higher Social Deprivation Index [SDI] score). For example, family physicians who worked in areas with the third quartile of SDI (OR = 1.366, 95% CI = 1.037 - 1.799) and the fourth quartile of SDI (OR = 1.364, 95% CI = 1.032 - 1.804) were more likely to enter SDOH as a diagnosis, compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Socioeconomic aspects of the communities and a practice-level capacity to address SDOH were the biggest predictors of documenting SDOH, rather than the physicians' own characteristics. These findings affirm the necessity of financial incentives and well-resourced care teams to successfully achieve integrated SDOH in primary care practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"38 2","pages":"290-301"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2024.240279R1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Social determinants of health (SDOH) significantly impact health outcomes, yet their integration into clinical decision making is inconsistent. We examined how family physicians document SDOH in electronic health records (EHRs) and identified factors influencing this practice.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2,089 family physicians completing the 2022 American Board of Family Medicine Continuous Certification Questionnaire. The outcome was physicians' self-reported SDOH documentation by checking a box within the EHR, writing it in a note, or entering it as a diagnosis. Physician, practice, and community characteristics associated with SDOH documentation were assessed, using logistic regression.

Results: We found that 61% of family physicians documented SDOH in notes, with fewer using checkboxes (46%) or diagnosis codes (35%). Across models, factors persistently positively associated with documenting SDOH included participating in value-based programs, having more resources for social needs, collaborating with neighborhood organizations, and working in a more disadvantaged area (higher Social Deprivation Index [SDI] score). For example, family physicians who worked in areas with the third quartile of SDI (OR = 1.366, 95% CI = 1.037 - 1.799) and the fourth quartile of SDI (OR = 1.364, 95% CI = 1.032 - 1.804) were more likely to enter SDOH as a diagnosis, compared with those in the least disadvantaged areas.

Discussion: Socioeconomic aspects of the communities and a practice-level capacity to address SDOH were the biggest predictors of documenting SDOH, rather than the physicians' own characteristics. These findings affirm the necessity of financial incentives and well-resourced care teams to successfully achieve integrated SDOH in primary care practice.

电子健康档案中记录健康社会决定因素的相关因素。
健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)显著影响健康结果,但其融入临床决策是不一致的。我们研究了家庭医生如何在电子健康记录(EHRs)中记录SDOH,并确定了影响这种做法的因素。方法:我们对完成2022年美国家庭医学委员会连续认证问卷的2089名家庭医生进行了横断面分析。结果是医生自我报告的SDOH文件,通过勾选电子病历中的一个方框,写在笔记中,或作为诊断输入。使用逻辑回归评估与SDOH文件相关的医生、实践和社区特征。结果:我们发现61%的家庭医生在笔记中记录了SDOH,较少使用复选框(46%)或诊断代码(35%)。在各个模型中,与记录SDOH持续呈正相关的因素包括参与基于价值的项目,拥有更多的社会需求资源,与社区组织合作,以及在更弱势的地区工作(更高的社会剥夺指数[SDI]得分)。例如,在SDI第三四分位数(OR = 1.366, 95% CI = 1.037 - 1.799)和SDI第四四分位数(OR = 1.364, 95% CI = 1.032 - 1.804)地区工作的家庭医生比在最不贫困地区工作的家庭医生更有可能将SDOH作为诊断。讨论:社区的社会经济方面和解决SDOH的实践水平能力是记录SDOH的最大预测因素,而不是医生自己的特征。这些发现肯定了财政激励和资源充足的护理团队在初级保健实践中成功实现综合SDOH的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信